Примеры использования A watercourse на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Objectively speaking, such a State remained a watercourse State.
International watercourse' means a watercourse, parts of which are situated in different States;
A watercourse State could cause various degrees of harm to another watercourse State.
Article 5 required States to utilize a watercourse equitably and reasonably.
For example, it could happen that a hydraulic dam was the most important use of a watercourse.
Люди также переводят
Excluded is wastewater discharged into a watercourse and used again downstream.
A watercourse was an independent unit over which no State could claim complete sovereignty.
There would be no justifiable ground to exclude a watercourse State from participation in the agreement.
Where a watercourse agreement is concluded between two or more watercourse States, it shall define the waters to which it applies.
It amounted to exclusion from consultations andperhaps from negotiations of a watercourse State whose use might be affected.
International watercourse' means a watercourse or aquifer, parts of which are situated in different States;
Draft article 2(h) defined"discharge zone" as the zone where water originating from an aquifer flowed to its outlets, such as a watercourse, a lake and so forth.
Where a watercourse has deteriorated, the watercourse States should regenerate it by individual or joint efforts.
Mr. NEGA(Ethiopia), referring to chapter V of document A/48/10,said that, as a watercourse State, his country attached great importance to the Commission's work on the topic.
This means that a watercourse State will be entitled to become a party to any agreement, even partial, concerning that watercourse. .
If the parties to such an agreement had not intended it to provide comprehensive regulation of a watercourse, it might be argued that the new convention should fill those gaps.
Secondly, the refusal of a watercourse State to give the required notification or to engage in consultations should have legal consequences for that State.
Discharge zone" means the zone where water originating from an aquifer flows to its outlets, such as a watercourse, a lake, an oasis,a wetland or an ocean.
Article 2(b) defined a watercourse as a system of surface waters and groundwaters constituting a unitary whole and flowing into a common terminus.
Mr. de VILLENEUVE(Netherlands), referring to article 18, paragraph 1,said that in the sentence beginning"If a watercourse State has serious reason to believe…", the word"serious" was superfluous.
A watercourse State, whether or not it was a party to the convention, remained subject to the obligations under international law that resulted from its geographical situation.
We propose thatartificial canals be excluded, so that canals dug between a watercourse State and another State do not entail the other State becoming a watercourse State.
Article 2(b) defined a watercourse as"a system of surface and underground waters constituting by virtue of their physical relationship a unitary whole and flowing into a common terminus.
While providing for the requirement of consultation with a view to negotiating in good faith for the purpose of concluding a watercourse agreement or agreements, the Commission stated that.
This Convention shall not alter the rights and obligations of a watercourse State arising under other agreements in force on the date on which it becomes a party to this Convention.
A watercourse State shall, without delay and by the most expeditious means available, notify other potentially affected States and competent international organizations of any emergency originating within its territory.
There were no provisions for disputes between parties using a watercourse for different purposes, although an attempt had been made in article 10, paragraph 2, to offer a procedural solution.
With respect to article 21, the commentary thoughtfully explains the idea of preventing, reducing orcontrolling pollution of a watercourse that"may" cause significant harm as amounting to a"due diligence" standard.
They could also change the point at which a watercourse crossed a frontier or lead to an increase in water salinity, thus destroying the ecological balance of a watercourse. .
There were no provisions for dispute settlement between parties using a watercourse for different purposes, although an attempt had been made in article 10, paragraph 2, to offer a procedural solution.