Примеры использования Advisory committee had concluded на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Advisory Committee had concluded that the funds for travel would be required for six months.
On the basis of the existing mandates andthe related current level of United Nations activities, the Advisory Committee had concluded that the proposed estimates were realistic and, as stated by the Secretary-General, cost effective.
The Advisory Committee had concluded that there was room to formulate a much more precise and accurate operational plan for the mission.
Following its discussion of the question andan exchange of views with the representatives of the Secretary-General, the Advisory Committee had concluded that resources should be made available to the Secretariat to cover the 1995 costs for posts on a temporary basis.
The Advisory Committee had concluded that the matter had been procedurally mishandled and that there was a lack of coordination between Secretariat units.
Mr. MSELLE(Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions)said that the previous year, the Advisory Committee had concluded that the amount requested for travel might be in excess of actual requirements.
The Advisory Committee had concluded that the programme of work for section 14, Crime control, was too ambitious to be carried out with the resources available.
Although self-insurance might expose the Organization to significant liability resulting from catastrophic loss, the Advisory Committee had concluded that, over time, that form of insurance would be more cost-effective and simpler to administer.
The Advisory Committee had concluded that the concept of the Logistics Base at Brindisi was a good one and had recalled that the General Assembly, in its resolution 49/233, had welcomed its establishment.
Following its discussion of the question andan exchange of views with the representatives of the Secretary-General, the Advisory Committee had concluded that resources should be made available to the Secretariat to cover the 1995 costs for posts on a temporary basis.
The Advisory Committee had concluded that there had been no agreed procedure for determining the total cost of the United Nations Office at Nairobi and the rates for reimbursement of services rendered to other organizations at Nairobi.
Following its review of the estimates with representatives of the Secretary-General,who had provided additional information, the Advisory Committee had concluded that some economies were possible, particularly in travel and consultancy costs.
For example, the Advisory Committee had concluded that the Secretariat's ability to implement the new procedures for reimbursing troop-contributing countries for contingent-owned equipment was flawed, and had requested a special audit by the Board of Auditors.
Mr. Mselle(Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions), introducing the report of ACABQ(A/53/7/Add.14), said that the Advisory Committee had concluded that the budget estimates had been prepared under conditions of uncertainty, which had made it difficult to provide accurate estimates.
With respect to cost accounting, the Advisory Committee had concluded that the report of the Secretary-General(A/53/257) did not contain the specific and conclusive information needed to enable the Advisory Committee either to reject the proposal for cost accounting or to recommend its endorsement.
Mr. Sulaiman(Syrian Arab Republic) expressed his delegation's sympathy with regard to the volume of work being performed by the Secretariat and pointed out that his question concerned the reasons for the delay in issuing the reports of ACABQ on the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, even thoughthose reports had been ready for about one month and the Advisory Committee had concluded its consideration of them.
After considerable discussion, the Advisory Committee had concluded that the final decision rested with the General Assembly.
Mr. Mselle(Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions), introducing the report of ACABQ on the financing of the activities arising fromSecurity Council resolution 687(1991): United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission(A/54/418), said that the Advisory Committee had concluded that no action should be taken by the General Assembly on the issue of overpayments pending the outcome of the cases that were still in litigation.
For the reasons set out in paragraph 6 of its report, the Advisory Committee had concluded that it was not advisable to amend article X of the Financial Regulations of the United Nations, as proposed by the Secretary-General.
The Advisory Committee had concluded that, in view of the core function of the new Coordination and Response Division, the post of Director should be funded from the regular budget, which would give rise to an additional resource requirement of some $35,600, inclusive of staff assessment, under the proposed programme budget for 2006-2007.
After examining the cost-benefit analysis report prepared by the Secretariat(A/52/858), the Advisory Committee had concluded that the long-term future of the base would depend upon the extent to which it could be used to manage other assets in addition to peacekeeping assets.
In that connection, the Advisory Committee had concluded that the existing mechanisms for committing funds were sufficient and that a letter from the President of the Security Council to the Secretary-General expressing concurrence with the Secretary-General's intention to plan and prepare for a possible new mission would be sufficient to trigger the implementation of General Assembly resolution 49/233 A.
In normal circumstances the Advisory Committee would simply approve the Secretary-General's recommendations for the establishment of posts to be funded by a trust fund; in the current case,however, the Advisory Committee had concluded that since the Trust Fund was unique in its magnitude and implications, it should communicate to the General Assembly the information provided to it by the Secretary-General and the reply it had sent to the Secretary-General.
Based on its interaction with the Secretariat, the Advisory Committee had concluded that a procedure for financing unforeseen activities not related to peace and security had been utilized and that the assertion in paragraph 18 of the Secretary-General's report(A/66/558) appeared invalid; that interpretation had been confirmed by the Secretary-General's representatives.
After an extensive discussion with representatives of the Secretary-General, the Advisory Committee had concluded that the organizational structure proposed for the mission did not appear to support the establishment of a second Deputy Special Representative post, at least not at the level of Assistant Secretary-General.
On the question of financial performance for the period 1 May to 31 October 1993(paras. 13 to 23) the Advisory Committee had concluded that the expenditure information set out in the report of the Secretary-General(A/48/850 and Corr.1) was an estimate and that some additional savings might be expected after closure of the accounts.
From the information provided to it, the Advisory Committee has concluded that the cost of the Office for Inter-Agency Affairs is not transparent.
On the basis of testimony from representatives of the Secretary-General, the Advisory Committee has concluded that too often the units and personnel involved in the preparation of budgets do not have the data contained in performance reports for the related missions.
On the basis of information from representatives of the Secretary-General, the Advisory Committee has concluded that there currently is no coordinated policy within the Secretariat regarding the development, management and hosting of Web sites.
On the basis of questions and answers from representatives of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, the Advisory Committee has concluded that the Office needs to have comprehensive knowledge of the surge and quick-response capacity currently available in the United Nations system.