Примеры использования Are weapons of mass destruction на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
They are weapons of mass destruction in slow motion.
Anti-personnel mines, too, are“weapons of mass destruction”.
Are weapons of mass destruction to be prohibited for Iraq but lawful for others?
In Africa, for example, small arms and light weapons are weapons of mass destruction.
Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction in the true meaning of the term.
Improvised nuclear devices(INDs)and nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction.
Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction. All nuclear weapons must therefore be decommissioned with a view to creating a peaceful and a safer world.
We all know only too well that these are, after all,not weapons of war- they are weapons of mass destruction.
The priorities in the field of disarmament are weapons of mass destruction, beginning with nuclear weapons, and the reduction of conventional forces and weapons so that their excessive accumulation will not endanger security and international peace.
In this regard, small weapons are as much a danger to our national security as are weapons of mass destruction.
The media, intelligence and military organs have undertaken a campaign of disinformation,claiming that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that are threatening peace and security in the Middle East, while they know full well that Iraq is free from such weapons. .
Look at their eyes as they try to convince you that they really must"invade to protect" or that"there are weapons of mass destruction" etc.
The rationale behind this initiative is that modern space law does not prohibit the placement of weapons in space, unless they are weapons of mass destruction.
The total elimination of chemical and biological weapons should also be among the high disarmament priorities, since,like nuclear weapons, they are weapons of mass destruction.
The complete elimination of chemical and biological weapons should also be a disarmament priority, since,just as nuclear weapons, these are weapons of mass destruction.
The total elimination of chemical and biological weapons should also be a disarmament priority, since such weapons, like nuclear weapons, are weapons of mass destruction.
While it is legitimate to examine the effects on health from a radiological point of view, a matter already under the scrutiny of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the World Health Organization,the suggestion that they are weapons of mass destruction is not borne out by objective evidence.
While it is legitimate to examine their effects on health from a radiological point of view-- a matter that is already under International Atomic Energy Agency and World Health Organization scrutiny-- the suggestion that these are weapons of mass destruction is not borne out by objective evidence.
With respect to the issue of transparency and the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms, my delegation remains convinced that the Register's methodology continues to be selective and lacking in balance, because it does not cover all types of weapons, including some that are weapons of mass destruction, or all aspects of a nation's capacity to produce, possess and stockpile arms.
The second item is weapons of mass destruction.
Nuclear weapons were weapons of mass destruction and selective disarmament was therefore tantamount to nuclear proliferation.
The very first resolution of the United Nations declared that nuclear weapons are weapon of mass destruction and should be prohibited.
Another major issue that requires multilateral cooperation is weapons of mass destruction and prevention of their proliferation.
Convincing evidence had been adduced to show that in the region in which the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya was situated there were weapons of mass destruction which were not subject to international inspection.
Those weapons are truly weapons of mass destruction on our continent.
These weapons are genuine weapons of mass destruction by another name.
They also recognize that those weapons are also weapons of mass destruction.
These weapons are true weapons of mass destruction that do not speak their name.
These weapons are true weapons of mass destruction that dare not speak their name.
Today, for countries and regions like ours, these weapons are genuine weapons of mass destruction.