Примеры использования Author's removal на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Author's removal from his post on grounds of unsuitability.
Only eight years have elapsed since the author's removal from presidential office.
Author's removal to Iran, where she would be at a risk of stoning or forced marriage.
The request was denied by immigration authorities,who needed the passport in order to execute the author's removal.
In addition, the author's removal is justified, lawful and reasonable and proportionate.
In case No. 1881/2009(Shakeel v. Canada), the Committee had to decide whether the author's removal to Pakistan would expose him to a real risk of irreparable harm.
The author's removal was not aimed at affecting the relationships between members of the family.
With respect to the author's allegations in relation to articles 17 and 23,paragraph 1, the State party submits that the author's removal is neither unlawful nor arbitrary.
In the present case, the author's removal has left his grandson with his mother and her husband in New Zealand.
If the Minister is not successful in the appeal the matter is merely referred back to the expulsions officer for his determination as to whether or not the author's removal should be deferred pending a risk assessment.
The author's removal would leave his family, who care deeply for him, without a son and brother and cause grief and loss.
As regards the requirement that the restriction be provided by law,the Committee notes that there was a legal framework for the proceedings which led to the author's removal from a teaching position.
It further submits that the author's removal to Somalia would not result in irreparable harm and that he failed to present a prima facie case.
The author's request to be allowed to stay in Canada for humanitarian reasons was refused by the immigration authorities on 10 May 1994. The author's removal to Pakistan was ordered to be effectuated on 17 July 1994.
The State party argues that if the author's removal is found by the Committee to amount to interference, such interference would be neither"unlawful" nor"arbitrary.
In this regard, the author refers to the Committee's jurisprudence in Sahid v. New Zealand: in this case, the complaint was dismissed because"the author's removal[had] left his grandson with his mother and her husband in New Zealand.
The Committee must therefore determine whether the author's removal to the Islamic Republic of Iran would expose him to a real risk of irreparable harm under article 6, paragraph 1, and article 7 of the Covenant.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights, is of the view that the author's removal to China would not violate his rights under articles 7, 18, and 19 of the Covenant.
If the Committee were to consider that the author's removal interfered with his rights under article 19, paragraph 2, the State party submits that, in any event, the measure was justified under article 19, paragraph 3.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the author's removal to Sri Lanka would violate his rights under article 7 of the Covenant.
It is also submitted that the author's removal did not have any necessary and foreseeable consequence on his appeal rights since the author's appeal had already taken place in 1991, while he was imprisoned in Canada.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights, is of the view that the author's removal to China would not violate his rights under article 7 and 9, paragraph 1 of the Covenant.
As to the claim under article 7 concerning the author's removal to Iraq, the State party argues that the obligation of non-refoulement does not extend to all Covenant rights, but is limited to the most fundamental rights relating to the physical and mental integrity of a person.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the author's removal to Pakistan would violate his rights under articles 6, paragraph 1, and 7 of the Covenant.
The Committee notes that the State party justifies the author's removal(a) by the fact that he was convicted of drugrelated offences, and(b) on the assumption that the serious nature of these offences is reflected by the length of the prison sentence imposed on him.
With regard to the author's claim under article 6, paragraph 1,the Committee notes that the information submitted to it does not provide sufficient grounds to substantiate that the author's removal to China would expose him to a real risk of a violation of his right to life.
As to the claim under article 7 concerning the author's removal to Iraq, counsel contends that if and when the author and his son are taken into custody, an obligation to remove them will arise under the Migration Act, and, as Iraqi citizens, the only place that they could be removed to would be Iraq.
Counsel's selective presentation of evidence, and in particular the absence of any information about the author since March 2005, indicates that there is in fact no evidence which would support a finding that the author's removal to Pakistan was in violation of any of her rights under the Covenant.
In the present case, andas the State party has conceded that the author's removal would constitute an interference with his family life, the Committee considers that a decision by the State party to deport the father of a family with two minor children and to compel the family to choose whether they should accompany him or stay in the State party is to be considered"interference" with the family.
The Human Rights Committee, acting under article 5, paragraph 4, of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,is of the view that the author's removal to the Islamic Republic of Iran would violate his rights under articles 6, paragraph 1, and article 7 of the Covenant.