Примеры использования Author also considers на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author also considers that the State party has violated his right to a fair trial.
The author also considers that the State party has not provided an adequate factual basis for its position.
The author also considers that his father is the victim of a violation of article 12 of the Covenant, inasmuch as he is not authorized to leave his country.
The author also considers that the Court acted in a discriminatory manner and therefore alleges a violation of article 26 of the Covenant.
The author also considers herself to be the victim of a violation of article 7, read alone and in conjunction with article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant.
The author also considers that the decision of the Provincial High Court introduced an element which was not established during the trial.
The author also considers that his legal status was not recognized and that the judgements against him constitute an attack on his reputation and honour.
The author also considers that she herself is the victim of a violation of articles 7, 17 and 23(para. 1), read alone and in conjunction with article 2(para. 3) of the Covenant.
The author also considers that his detention at both Port Phillip Prison and Maribyrnong Immigration Detention Centre constituted punishment for the purpose of article 14, paragraph 7.
The author also considers himself a victim of a breach of article 14 of the Covenant, owing to the manner in which French proceedings are conducted and the methods of administration of justice from which he has suffered.
The author also considers that as a person with a different nationality, he has suffered discrimination in his entitlement to his right to protection from arbitrary interference with his home and his right to protection of his family.
The author also considers the detention warrant of 27 June 2013 to be illegal because it did not specify the duration of the pretrial detention, as required by article 219 of the Cameroonian Code of Criminal Procedure.
The author also considers that, while the issue of the right to a fair trial was held inadmissible by the European Court of Human Rights, it should be considered admissible by the Committee in compliance with its jurisprudence.
The author also considers that the State party's argument that transitional justice mechanisms are more appropriate for a comprehensive inquiry and investigation does not provide her with a guarantee of prompt prosecution of the perpetrators.
The author also considers that the health, interest and well-being of a person with disability come above the public interest of not allowing any buildings on land that has been marked out as areas which should not be built on.
The author also considers the crisis caused by the admission in October 2002 of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea that it had a nuclear weapons programme, and the dangers of pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons, wherever it comes from.
The author also considers that the application in his case of the Law on Elections of the Republic of Belarus, which prohibits the nomination as candidate for Parliament of persons who have suffered an administrative conviction in the year prior to an election, violates these rights.
The author also considers that her son's disappearance constituted and continues to constitute for herself and the rest of her family a paralysing, painful and distressing ordeal given that they know nothing of his fate or, if he is in fact dead, of the circumstances of his death and where he is buried.
The author also considers that her husband's disappearance has been, and continues to be, for herself and for her close relatives, a paralysing, painful and harrowing ordeal, because the family is completely ignorant of the victim's fate and, if he has died, of the circumstances of his death and his place of burial.
The author also considers that the decision of the Danish Immigration Service was flawed because it rejected the notion that a person may be eligible for refugee status when a country's authorities fail to consider his genuine religious convictions as a valid reason for being excused from required military service.
The author also considers that, despite her new application for a residence permit following her marriage to a New Zealander, she could be deported at any time insofar as, under paragraph 11 of the Immigration Act 2009, the New Zealand immigration authorities are under no obligation to consider any new visa application.
The author also considers that the disappearance of her husband and her son has been, and continues to be, for herself and for her close relatives, a paralysing, painful and distressing experience, to the extent that the family of the disappeared persons knows nothing of the victims' fate or, if they are in fact dead, of the circumstances of their death and the place where they are buried.
The author also considers his arrest, detention in police custody and pretrial detention to be arbitrary because he was detained as part of a judicial conspiracy organized against him with the aim of extorting his intellectual property rights over his invention and depriving the Hope Group of the exclusive rights granted to it to exploit the user licence purchased by the State party.
The authors also consider that this situation results from a lack of willingness on the part of the police to investigate, and from the failure of prosecutors to make use of available evidentiary sources.
Some authors also consider the right to education from the relatively new angle of the“third generation” of human rights.
The authors also considered how treatments could be designed to help disentangle confounding drivers of change, including climate change.
The authors also consider the period of residence determining the right to vote in referendums from 2014 onwards, namely 20 years, to be excessive.
As a subsidiary point, the authors also consider that the State party violated article 14, paragraph 1, in that their conviction on the basis of insufficient evidence also infringes the principle of due process.
The authors also consider that the application of specific procedural burdens to civilian victims of war in order for them to access non-pecuniary damages, as opposed to veterans of the VRS, amounts to discrimination in violation of articles 2, paragraph 1, and 26 of the Covenant.
The authors also consider that the military courts cannot be considered as offering an effective remedy within the meaning of article 2, paragraph 3, since in military justice the persons implicated are both judge and party.