Примеры использования Author has exhausted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It concedes that the author has exhausted all criminal appeals.
On the alleged violations of articles 9, 14 and19 of the Covenant, it concedes that the author has exhausted domestic remedies.
It also notes that the author has exhausted domestic remedies.
The Committee notes that the State party has not raised any objections with regard to the admissibility of the communication and that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
It thus considers that the author has exhausted domestic remedies.
Люди также переводят
It concedes that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies, and does not challenge the admissibility of the communication.
As such, the State party concedes that the author has exhausted all domestic remedies.
The Committee notes that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies and that the State party has not raised any objections to the admissibility of the claim.
The Committee notes that the State party considers that the author has exhausted domestic remedies.
It also notes that the author has exhausted domestic remedies, as has been conceded by the State party.
By virtue of these facts, it is difficult to conclude that the author has exhausted her domestic remedies.
It further concedes that the author has exhausted domestic remedies with respect to his complaints about prison conditions.
By submission, dated 2 September 1992, the State party concedes that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The Committee has ascertained that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies, as required under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
It is also clear from the aforesaid facts that the author has exhausted the domestic remedies available to him.
The Committee concludes that the author has exhausted domestic remedies in relation to claims under article 14, and that the communication is not inadmissible under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
By submission dated 4 September 1992, the State party concedes that the author has exhausted the domestic remedies available to him.
The Committee therefore considers that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies with regard to the alleged violations of article 25, and that these claims are admissible.
On the basis of the information before it andin the absence of any objection by the State party, the Committee considers that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies and that the requirements of article 4, paragraph 1, of the Optional Protocol have been met.
The State party considers that the author has exhausted all domestic remedies and, not being aware of any other grounds for inadmissibility, has no objection to the admissibility of the communication.
The State party concedes that the author has exhausted available domestic remedies in his case.
The Committee therefore considers that the author has exhausted domestic remedies under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol in relation to the second procedure initiated by the author in 2005.
The Committee considers that the author has exhausted domestic remedies with regard to the second issue.
Consequently, the Committee considers that the author has exhausted domestic remedies and that the communication is admissible.
For these reasons the Committee finds that the author has exhausted domestic remedies, and this part of the communication is admissible.
The State party also points out that the author has exhausted domestic remedies, and does not contest the admissibility of the communication.
The Committee notes that it is not disputed that the author has exhausted all available domestic remedies and therefore considers that that requirement has been met.
The Committee has also ascertained that the author has exhausted domestic remedies, as required under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
On 22 February 2006, the State party confirms that the author has exhausted domestic remedies but submits that the communication is manifestly ill-founded and thus inadmissible.
By submission of 18 February 1993, the State party confirms that the author has exhausted domestic remedies and states that it is not aware of any other obstacles to admissibility of the communication.