Примеры использования Barcelona traction на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Barcelona Traction.
This is the obligation erga omnes referred to by the Court in Barcelona Traction.
In the Barcelona Traction case, the International Court of Justice observed that.
Applies to obligations erga omnes in the sense explained by the Court in Barcelona Traction.
In his separate opinion in the Barcelona Traction case, Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice stated.
Люди также переводят
The anomaly of the legal situation was recognized by Judge Morelli in Barcelona Traction when he stated.
In the present case, Barcelona Traction is in receivership in the country of incorporation.
This was emphasized by the International Court in Barcelona Traction when it declared.
The Court in Barcelona Traction raised the possibility of such a rule but declined to give an answer on either its existence or its scope.
A significant role in securing recognition of this principle was played by the decision of the International Court of Justice in the Barcelona Traction case.
Article 11 aims to codify the law as set out in Barcelona Traction, for which it has been congratulated by other States.
This is an obligation erga omnes,according to the judgment of the International Court of Justice in its famous dictum in the Barcelona Traction case.
In the Barcelona Traction case, it gave two examples of rights which have this status, the right to be free from slavery and from racial discrimination.
He believed it should extend to legal persons,because the decision in the Barcelona Traction case had made clear that it could.
He was aware that, in the Barcelona Traction case, the Court had not been in favour of such dual protection, but it seemed that that solution might be appropriate.
And places particular emphasis on the“essential distinction” drawn by the Court in the Barcelona Traction case. Supra, note 57, commentary to article 19, para. 10.
Article 9 does not require the existence of a genuine link between the corporation andprotecting State of the kind advocated by Belgium in Barcelona Traction.
Since the Barcelona Traction case, there had been much debate on the issue of obligations owed to the international community as a whole in the fulfilment of which all States had a legal interest.
In 1970, the International Court of Justice recognized the prohibition of racial discrimination andcharacterized it as giving rise to an obligation erga omnes in the Barcelona Traction case.
The Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Limited was a company incorporated in 1911 in Toronto, Canada, where it had its head office, which carried on business in Spain.
A possible additional reference could be made to"and in whose territory it has registered its office" which had also been considered in the Barcelona Traction decision.
In the Barcelona Traction case, the International Court of Justice had distinguished such obligations from those stemming from a relationship with other States in the context of diplomatic protection.
Satisfaction was expressed with the fact thatthe Commission had ensured overall consistency with the case law of the International Court of Justice, on the basis of the Barcelona Traction case.
The decision of the International Court of Justice in the Barcelona Traction case suggested that the Court intended to limit erga omnes rights and obligations to those arising under jus cogens norms.
With regard to diplomatic protection, the Nordic countries were glad that the principles derived from the judgement of the International Court of Justice in the Barcelona Traction case were being applied.
The Court's celebrated dictum in Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase,(Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1970, p. 32, para. 33) is frequently invoked for more than it can bear.
The suggestion that the States of nationality of all shareholders in a company be permitted to exercise diplomatic protection was dismissed by the Court in Barcelona Traction in the following terms.
However, in the Barcelona Traction case, the Court did not have to address the situation in which a company was incorporated in one State but had a"close and permanent connection" with another State.
The Nordic countries were pleased that, when codifying the rules on diplomatic protection of legal persons,the Commission had based its work on the rules derived from the Barcelona Traction case.
The Court in Barcelona Traction set a higher threshold for determining the demise of a company. The"paralysis" or"precarious financial situation" of a company was dismissed as inadequate.