Примеры использования Belief groups на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In addition, Governments have the possibility to directly invite religious or belief groups to meetings.
Violence between religious or belief groups is often triggered by a dangerous combination of paranoia and public contempt against minorities.
Facilitating dialogue between members of various religious or belief groups in the framework of the State itself;
A full picture of the religious and belief diversity in a State should include all religions and belief groups.
In addition, the State has the ability to directly invite representatives of religious or belief groups to meetings, thus taking the role of host and facilitator.
States should ensure that there is no discriminatory treatment in regard to the legal andadministrative recognition of all religious and belief groups.
International standards do not allow non-recognition of religious or belief groups to result in denial of their rights.
Long-term dialogue projects will more likely reveal the relevance of internal diversity,which in some settings may be more significant than the differences between religious or belief groups.
States should refrain from exercising pressure on religious or belief groups whose members prefer not to be registered as legal entities under domestic law;
Formal interreligious dialogue makes it possible, for instance, to tackle stereotypes orprejudices based on an explanation of the self-understanding of the various religious or belief groups involved in such dialogue.
As such, she deplores that members of certain religious or belief groups are often denied access to employment or have faced obstacles thereto, both in Government institutions and private companies.
The Human Rights Committee has recognized that the situationof"non-traditional" minority religions and beliefs gives cause for concern and has noted a tendency to discriminate against newly established religious and belief groups, and hostility against them.
By not providing appropriate legal options that, de jure and de facto,are accessible to all religious or belief groups interested in obtaining a legal personality status, States would fail to honour their obligations under the human right to freedom of religion or belief. .
Regular communication across religious boundaries is the most important precondition for fostering understanding and preventing orovercoming mistrust between religious or belief groups which is one of the root causes of collective religious hatred.
Typical targets of such restrictive policies are members of those religious or belief groups that have, or are said to have, a tendency to evade State control and, at the same time, are perceived as not really fitting into the historical and cultural makeup of the country.
While not constituting an exhaustive list of negative factors, they can mutually reinforce one another, thus possibly further speeding up the vicious cycle of mistrust, narrow-mindedness, hysteria, scapegoating andrumours that arouse contempt against certain religious or belief groups.
In 1996, the publication by a National Assembly's commission, of a list containing the names of almost one thousand main and subsidiary belief groups has negatively affected the right to freedom of religion or belief of some of their members.
If some religious or belief groups prefer not to participate in a given project or generally wish to preserve distance from the State or from other religious groups, such an attitude of reserve must be respected as a part of their freedom of religion or belief. .
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and the Fight against Terrorism participated in the training of law enforcement officials, including activities aimed at preventing acts of violence, verbal harassment and discrimination against Jews, Muslims andmembers of unrecognized belief groups.
However, the general balance of State support for interreligious communication should reflect the requirement of conceptual inclusiveness in the sense that all religious or belief groups that would like to participate and benefit from State support should get their fair share of attention and options.
Such State policies of depriving some religious or belief groups of a previously held status may be pursued for different purposes; for example, to exercise control over some religious or belief movements or marginalizing groups deemed not to fit into the cultural, religious or political makeup of the country.
Consequently, references to"religious minorities" encompass a broad range of religious or belief communities, traditional andnon-traditional, whether recognized by the State or not, and include more recently established faith or belief groups that seek the protection of their rights under minority rights standards.
In addition, the necessity of dispelling existing stereotypes by promoting communication between members of different religious or belief groups has rightly received particular attention in recent years, given the many incidents of religiously motivated violence see for example A/HRC/13/40; A/HRC/16/53/Add.1; A/HRC/13/40/Add.1; and A/HRC/10/8/Add.1.
He points to a number of possibilities for States, including by encouraging interreligious communication by publicly expressing their appreciation for well-defined dialogue projects; providing financial subsidies to existing or newly created projects;facilitating dialogue between members of various religious or belief groups in the framework of the State itself; and developing forums for regular encounters of people of different religious or belief affiliations.
Furthermore, no religious community should be empowered to decide about orto veto the registration of another religious or belief group.
No religious community should have the possibility to exercise a"veto" or otherwise influence the decision to register ornot to register another religious or belief group.
States should ensure that no religious community has, de jure or de facto, the possibility to exercise a"veto" or otherwise influence the decision to register ornot to register another religious or belief group;
She thus found it particularly worrying when a religious community is empowered, either de jure or de facto,to decide whether or not to veto the registration of another religious or belief group.
In this regard it seems to be particularly worrying when a religious community is empowered- either de jure or de facto- to decide about orto veto the registration of another religious or belief group.
External groups promote the belief that these regions are backward and underdeveloped and interrupt the transmission local knowledge.