Примеры использования Body noted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Executive Body noted that the Convention would be celebrating its thirtieth anniversary in 2009.
A number of scientists, studying the man,the processes taking place in his body, noted that the working capacity of the person affected by it week cycle all activities.
The Executive Body noted that these considerations would not have any effect on 1995 contributions.
Referring to the request of the Working Group on Strategies for guidance concerning joint implementation(EB. AIR/WG.5/26, para. 19(d)),the Executive Body noted that the emphasis of further work should shift to the drawing-up of concrete proposals on rules and conditions.
The Executive Body noted that its twenty-second session was the first meeting of the Parties to the Protocol on Heavy Metals.
Люди также переводят
In adopting its decision concerning Norway's compliance, the Executive Body noted three modifications that Norway considered should have been reflected in paragraph 12 of the Implementation Committee's report EB. AIR/2004/6.
The Executive Body noted the increasing contributions but recognized that a higher ambition level was needed to achieve its goals.
The Vice-Chairman of the Commission, in recognizing the specific,sovereign nature of the Executive Body, noted the comprehensive activities under the Convention, its generation of several ministerial meetings, its increasing membership and its far-reaching scientific and policy-oriented network.
The Executive Body noted that, due to the present difficult economic conditions, the Russian Federation could participate in the financing of the effect-oriented activities only by providing technical and scientific work and services, whose value would correspond to the assessed voluntary contribution, e.g. work of Russian experts at the pilot international mapping sub-centre on issues of critical loads and levels in the Commonwealth of Independent States CIS.
At its eighteenth session, the Executive Body noted the difficulties encountered summarizing the large volume of information resulting from the modified questionnaire.
The Executive Body noted that the Working Group on Effects and the International Cooperative Programmes(ICPs) and the Mapping Programme had made significant progress in the requested streamlining of activities and had defined specific objectives for individual ICPs and the Mapping Programme corresponding to the actual needs arising under the Convention EB. AIR/R.88, para. 26 h.
In particular, the Executive Body noted that decision 2002/1 had not been effective in attracting the necessary funds for coordinating the core activities not covered by the EMEP Protocol.
The Executive Body noted that the Russian Federation had now provided the missing emission data referred to in paragraphs 8 and 10 as well as the missing reply to the 2004 questionnaire on strategies and policies referred to in paragraphs 29, 30 and 40 of the report of the Implementation Committee EB. AIR/2005/3/Add.1.
In its decision 2010/11, the Executive Body noted that the following nine Parties had not provided complete replies to the 2010 questionnaire: Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Romania, Russian Federation, Spain and Switzerland.
The Executive Body noted that three Parties, Croatia, Luxembourg and the Russian Federation, had now provided the missing emission data referred to in paragraph 6, 9, 12 and 17 of the report of the Implementation Committee EB. AIR/2004/6/Add.1.
The Executive Body noted the limited resources of other subsidiary bodies, as well as of Parties to the Convention, for participation in parallel activities.
The Executive Body noted the high quality of the EMEP work and the importance of continuing to guarantee international financing for this work.
The Executive Body noted that there were situations where more flexibility might be useful, and it agreed to consider a new process for accreditation of NGOs.
The Executive Body noted that the budget for 2006 was ambitious compared with the funds donated in 2005, but recognized that a higher ambition level was needed to achieve the necessary support.
In December 2000, the Executive Body noted the importance of the global-scale transport of mercury and invited the United Nations Environment Programme(UNEP) to initiate an assessment of mercury and consider future action.
The Executive Body noted that it would be useful if Parties indicated at an early stage their intention of proposing substances, so as to allow other Parties and interested stakeholders to prepare additional information to contribute to the proposal.
The Executive Body noted that, while the regional action would provide a substantial contribution for global action, the two activities were mutually supportive, and duplication of work could be avoided through full transparency between the two bodies, including regular exchange of information.
In its Decision 2011/10, the Executive Body noted that France, Latvia and the European Union had not replied to the 2010 questionnaire and that the Russian Federation had replied to all the questions for two protocols to which it is a Party(1985 Sulphur and 1988 NOX), except to question 4 for the Protocol on NOX.
In its decision 2003/9, the Executive Body noted that Luxembourg, the European Community, Estonia, France and Spain had not fulfilled their reporting obligations with respect to strategies and policies under various protocols and it requested the Committee to review the progress made by these five Parties towards achieving compliance.
In its decision 2005/8, the Executive Body noted that four Parties(Iceland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg and Romania) had not yet reported on strategies and policies under one or more protocols, by means of the 2004 questionnaire or otherwise, and that two Parties(Ukraine and the European Community) had provided incomplete responses in their replies to the questionnaire.
In its decision 2004/5, the Executive Body noted that Slovenia was not in compliance with article 2.5(b) of the 1994 Protocol on Sulphur as of 1 July 2004, and it requested Slovenia to inform the Committee of its progress towards achieving compliance, if possible before the Committee's sixteenth meeting, and in any event in time for its seventeenth meeting. Slovenia's Minister of the Environment and Spatial Planning sent a letter on 24 June 2005 informing the Committee about Slovenia's progress.
Several treaty bodies noted the establishment, in 2010, of the Office of the Commissioner for Protection against Discrimination, an independent body for the promotion of equality.
While welcoming steps taken,treaty bodies noted that unacceptably high levels of violence against women persisted.
Bodies noted in articles 6 and 36 should undertake publicity campaigns and ensure appropriate contact points for allegations from citizens.
Several treaty bodies noted internal decisions taken to limit the length of their concluding observations.