Примеры использования Case shows на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The case shows how relevant research on s.
In view of the importance of the nickel for the Zimbabwean economic development andthe increasing potential demand, the case shows the importance of competition law and policy in monitoring and challenging anticompetitive conduct.
This awful case shows once again how quickly the immorality can affect the children.
Our case shows that international assistance can serve as an indispensable engine for development and growth by creating a virtuous cycle in the development process.
Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding tweeted:"This case shows why a clear legal framework for the protection of personal data is not a luxury but a necessity.
This case shows that opening up direct railway traffic will have a positive effect on Armenian rock exports- although a rock export boom should not be expected, because the demand for construction rock is not very elastic, and a 10% reduction will not make a significant change to the breakdown of the Russian market.
The Special Rapporteur considers that this case shows that the excesses of the local authorities were successfully tempered by the central Government, which he welcomes.
This case shows the importance of sharing information when analysing merger applications.
A detailed analysis of the case shows that the first helicopter had arrived in June on board an Ilyushin-76 and stayed at the repair plant for about one month.
This case shows the effects that resale price maintenance can have in developing countries.
This case shows the desperation of hundreds of thousands of people living in deplorable conditions throughout the country.
This case shows how to calculate static detonation parameters with Chemical Wokbench software.
This case shows that any place may become a crime scene when a dangerous offender is involved.
The case shows how important it is for developing countries to be equipped with effective merger control provisions.
This case shows the impartiality of the International Criminal Court and its commitment to protecting peacekeeping forces.
This case shows that when a good intention of generosity is put off, it faces the danger not to be accomplished.
This case shows that evidence gathering is an important element when dealing with competition cases, especially when cartels are concerned.
This case shows us the creation of financial instruments that allow for the development and consolidation of individual or collective enterprises that would hardly exist through traditional ways to access credit.
This case shows the importance of having an appropriate framework in place to investigate cartel activities such as price fixing, market segmentation, production restriction and bid rigging in developing countries.
The case shows the importance given by the Thai commission to challenges made by activists who regarded anti-poor market segmentation strategies to be anticompetitive under the refusal to supply doctrine.
The case shows that, even in cases where an operation is approved after an appeal, the competition authority could still impose obligations that need to be respected in order to avoid a negative impact of the operation.
This case shows that in the absence of adequate evidence to prosecute anti-competitive practices, developing countries may sometimes use other government policies to tackle a competition case. .
This case shows that, in situations where immunity is granted to companies engaged in cartel activities, then follow-up and compliance actions need to be initiated in order to ensure that the companies do not engage in further cartel activities.
This court case shows among other things the usefulness of the law adopted in France in July 1990, following the decision taken by the Colmar Indictment Division, which allowed associations for the defence of the poor to claim damages in criminal proceedings before the courts.
This case shows that the desperate need for quick cash to finance the defence of its territory has instead brought other problems to the Government and has paradoxically deprived the treasury of substantial revenue.
This case shows that relatively more experienced competition authorities in developing countries can design and implement their own remedies, even structural remedies such as divestiture, to address the competition concerns in their markets.
The case shows that the enforcement of regional competition law providing for sanction against hard-core horizontal arrangements between competitors can also have procompetitive effects in other countries, including developing countries.
However, the case shows a striking lack of transparency at all stages of the investigation and that those with political influence continue to act with impunity, which again must be seen as further undermining general confidence in the Mexican legal and political system among the population.
The case shows that powerful action on vertical restraints of competition affecting outbound trade of a country is possible even if the addressee of such action is located in another country, and that such action may have procompetitive effects in other countries, including developing countries.
That case showed the scale of illegal logging and smuggling.