Примеры использования Chamber denied на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Chamber denied this motion.
After a brief recess, the Trial Chamber denied release.
The Chamber denied the motion on 27 July 2004.
By decision of 11 November 1999, the Trial Chamber denied the request.
The Appeals Chamber denied leave to appeal.
Люди также переводят
Also in this case, the Prosecution proposed to present rebuttal evidence, but the Chamber denied this request.
The Trial Chamber denied the motion on 16 December 2003.
The defence counsel for Kanyabashi andNyiramasuhuko appealed the decision and the Appeals Chamber denied their appeals on 17 April 2000.
On 2 August 2002, the Trial Chamber denied the accused's motion for provisional release.
March 2003, and pleaded not guilty to the same counts as those charged against his two co-accused.On 31 October 2003, the Chamber denied a request filed by all three accused for provisional release.
On 28 March 2002, the Trial Chamber denied an application by Jokić for provisional release.
On 19 July, the Prosecution filed a third motion requesting the joining of three cases involving four accused, Milan Martic, Jovica Stanisic, Franko Simatovic andVojislav Seselj. The Trial Chamber denied this motion on 10 November 2005.
On 15 April 2003, the Trial Chamber denied the accused's request for provisional release.
During the reporting period, the Division also responded to an application for damages or compensation for the alleged violation of fundamental rights filed by Protais Zigiranyirazo, whose 2008 convictions in the Trial Chamber were set aside by the Appeals Chamber's 16 November 2009 judgement.On 18 June 2012, the Trial Chamber denied Zigiranyirazo's motion.
In July 2010, the Chamber denied the Prosecution's request for an order against Croatia in this respect.
In the case of Prosecutor v. Momčilo Perišić, on 20 March 2014, the Appeals Chamber denied a prosecution motion seeking reconsideration of the appeal judgement.
The Chamber denied defence motions for judgements of acquittal at the close of the prosecution case.
A date for trial was set immediately after a specially appointed Chamber denied Šešelj's application for disqualification of two of the Judges on 19 November 2010.
The Chamber denied the motion and held that an indigent accused does not enjoy an unfettered or unqualified right to have counsel of his choice.
The trial wasconducted over 81 days. On 13 May 2003, the Chamber denied the Prosecution motion to call evidence in rebuttal.
On 6 June 2008, the Chamber denied the Prosecutor's request to refer the case of Gaspard Kanyarukiga(businessman) to Rwanda.
Briefing of the appeal was complete as at 23 August 2004.On 31 August 2004, the Appeals Chamber denied all four rule 115 motions previously filed by the appellant.
On 26 April 2013, the Chamber denied a defence request to stay the proceedings due to the invalidity of the confirmation decision.
A date for trial was set immediately after a specially appointed Chamber denied Šešelj's application for the disqualification of two of the Judges on 19 November 2010.
The Trial Chamber denied initial requests for an extensive adjournment, instead undertaking that shorter adjournments would be granted as the fairness of the proceedings required.
On 10 March 2008, Pre-Trial Chamber I joined the two cases. On 9 June,the Appeals Chamber denied an appeal of the decision on joinder, confirming that the two cases could proceed together as one.
On 19 June 2008, the Chamber denied the Prosecutor's request to transfer the case of Ildephonse Hategekimana(former Lieutenant, Commander of Ngoma Camp), currently detained in Arusha, to Rwanda.
On 28 May 2008,after hearing the parties and four amici curiae, the Chamber denied the Prosecutor's request to transfer the case of one detainee(Yusuf Munyakazi, former Interahamwe leader) to Rwanda.
The Appeals Chamber denied the accused's appeal on all grounds, and found the accused guilty, by virtue of his individual criminal responsibility, of seven additional counts of grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, one count of a violation of the laws or customs of war and one count of a crime against humanity.
In its decision dated 23 July 2004, the Trial Chamber denied the motion on the basis that the formal requirements of rule 65, providing for provisional release, had not been met.