Примеры использования Claimants have submitted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some claimants have submitted claims on behalf of their insurers.
The Panel has also considered further information and documents that the claimants have submitted in response to notifications sent to them.
D6 claimants have submitted varying types of evidence in support of their claims.
The Panel has also noted in its review of third instalment claims that some claimants have submitted further documentation in their responses that contain additional identifier information.
These claimants have submitted claims for the interruption of their business operations.
The Government has requested that the communication be declared inadmissible given that some of the claimants have submitted their case and a similar petition before the European Court of Human Rights and that the cases before the European Court and the Working Group are identical or parallel on many issues.
Some claimants have submitted claims for MPA for witnessing the intentional infliction of events leading to the injury of the claimant's spouse, child or parent in cases where the injury was the result of scud missiles fired against Israel by Iraq.
With respect to evidence proving employment, the claimants have submitted copies of their employment contracts indicating their date of appointment, duration of contract, basic salary and, where applicable, other benefits and entitlements; and others have submitted copies of letters of offer of employment, letters of promotion or renewal of contracts.
The Claimants have submitted amendments to some of the claims based on results of monitoring and assessment activities.
Some claimants have submitted claims on behalf of insurers, including governmental export-credit guarantee agencies.
Still other claimants have submitted very detailed statements explaining what they were doing in Iraq or Kuwait, their salaries and a detailed explanation of their losses.
Theyse claimants have submitted claims to the Commission seeking compensation for a range of losses that they say they allegedly sustained as a direct result of Iraq''s invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
All of the claimants have submitted medical reports from doctors, hospitals or a Government authority describing the nature and extent of their injuries, the types of treatment given to the claimants, and a prognosis.
Most of these claimants have submitted a personal statement affirming they had been detained and tortured, and an official document from the Kuwaiti authorities or the International Committee of the Red Cross stating that the person had been detained.
Where claimants have submitted a statement of claim meeting the Commission's requirements and the statement is supported by documentary or other appropriate evidence, article 35, paragraph 1 of the Rules requires the Panel to“determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight” of such evidence.
The Panel finds that all 30 claimants have submitted sufficient documentary evidence to establish the fact of injury and the requisite causal link between the injury and Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, in the form of medical reports and photographs depicting the injuries sustained.
Where claimants have submitted a statement of claim meeting the Commission's requirements and the statement is supported by documentary or other appropriate evidence, article 35, paragraph 1 of the Rules requires the Panel to“determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight” of such evidence.
In all but one case, the claimants had submitted invoices or other documents prior to 2 August 1990 requesting payment from the Kuwaiti party.
In all cases, the claimants had submitted invoices or other documents dated prior to 2 August 1990 requesting payment from the Kuwaiti party.
In most cases, the claimants had submitted invoices or other documents dated prior to 2 August 1990 requesting payment from the Kuwaiti party.
In particular, this method would be applied in situations where the claimant has submitted evidence that he or she purchased the money at a rate different from the rate adopted by the Panel.
In particular, this would be applied in situations where the claimant has submitted evidence that he or she purchased the money at a rate different from the rate adopted by the Panel.
Pursuant to these provisions, each claimant has submitted a considerable body of documentary and other evidence in support of its claim.
The claimant has submitted to Court the Petition for attraction FGUK GIKMZ« Moscow Kremlin» as the third party as process infringed on interests of the given legal person.
Further, to the extent that the claimant had submitted documentation in support of medical expenses(C1-Money) for the injury, whether it was considered to be a“serious personal injury” or not, the claimant could be compensated.
Where the claimant has submitted sufficient evidence to establish the existence of the loss, but not the claimed amount, the Panel, as with other categories of loss(for example, the loss of personal property), must determine a method for valuing the loss.
Claims for the loss of future income orprofits should be compensable where the claimant has submitted proof from a doctor stating that the claimant is partially or totally disabled, and certifying the extent to which the claimant is able or unable to work.
With respect to the claim for loss of the opportunity to exercise options under warrants held by the claimant at the time of the invasion and occupation, or to trade on the markets,the Panel found that these losses were of a speculative nature and furthermore, that the claimant had submitted insufficient proof of the amounts that he claimed he would have made had he exercised the options or been able to trade on the markets.
While approximately 90 per cent of C4-CPHO claimants had submitted some form of evidence in support of their claims in addition to the claim form, given all considerations and circumstances, the Panel concluded that the statistical regression model developed would be the best available option for valuing such claims within the context of a mass claims processing programme.
In support of his claim, the Kuwaiti claimant has submitted, inter alia, the relevant business licence and approvals, a rent receipt, an insurance policy, a maintenance contract and business invoices.