Примеры использования Committee reached на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The committee reached agreement on 21 draft resolutions.
On the basis of a review of this material, the Committee reached the following conclusions.
The Committee reached certain conclusions and made recommendations, as follows.
At its meetings on 30 November 2005, the Committee reached consensus on one draft resolution under item 15.
The Committee reached consensus on all the items allocated to it for consideration.
Люди также переводят
On the recommendations contained in the report of the Joint Inspection Unit, the Committee reached the following conclusions.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1781/2008 Berzig v. Algeria.
At an informal meeting held from 5 to 7May 2004 in Utrecht, the Netherlands, the Committee reached agreement on further enhancing its working methods.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1892/2009 J.J.U.B. v. Spain.
At the second meeting,held on the same day in the afternoon, the Committee reached consensus on one resolution under item 15, which is also contained in document GC.14/L.2.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1898/2009 Choudhary v. Canada.
At its afternoon meeting on 8 December, the Committee reached consensus on a draft resolution on UNIDO activities in the field of energy and environment under agenda item 17.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1502/2006 Marinich v. Belarus.
On some other subjects, the Committee reached a large measure of agreement but left some points for completion by the Conference.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1640/2007 El Abani v. Libya.
At its meetings on 4 December 2003, the Committee reached consensus on 12 draft resolutions(items 10(b), 10(e), 12, 14, 15 and 19), which are contained in documents GC.10/L.2/Add.1 and Add.2.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1378/2005 Kasimov v. Uzbekistan.
On the question of accreditation, the Committee reached agreement on how best to proceed as set out in the note entitled“Input from informal consultations to the report of the NGO Committee”.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1044/2002 Shukurova v. Tajikistan.
In its preliminary conclusions(twenty-fifth session) the Committee reached consensus that the extension of the lifetime of an NPP, even in absence of any works, was to be considered as a major change to an activity and consequently subject to the provisions of the Convention.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1412/2005 Butovenko v. Ukraine.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1615/2007 Zavrel v. the Czech Republic.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1150/2003 Uteev v. Uzbekistan.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in case No. 1785/2008(Olechkevitch v. Belarus), concerning the same events.
In 1972, the Committee reached consensus on basis"understandings" contained in two separate memorandums.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in cases Nos. 1508/2006(Amundson v. Czech Republic) and 1574/2007 Slezàk v. Czech Republic.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in cases No. 1750/2008(Sudalenko v. Belarus) and No. 1866/2009 Chebotareva v. Russian Federation.
The Committee reached a similar conclusion in cases Nos. 1263-1264/2004(Khuseynov and Butae v. Tajikistan) and 1280/2004 Tolipkhuzhaev v. Uzbekistan.
At that meeting the Committee reached consensus on the proposal concerning unutilitized balances of appropriations for the biennium 2008-2009.
The Committee reached the conclusion that decisions taken on its methods of work would determine the outcome of the discussion on the enlargement of its membership.