Примеры использования Complainant's wife на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant's wife received threats, including one from the governor of the Oghuz region.
For example, since the assessments took place, the complainant's wife has had surgery and ongoing treatment for thyroid cancer.
The complainant's wife, when questioned, also never mentioned any imprisonment of her husband in June 1998.
On 15 June 2004, the Aliens Appeals Board granted the complainant's wife and her five children permanent resident status in Sweden on humanitarian grounds.
The complainant's wife, Mitra Pishan, filed an initial asylum application on her own behalf and on that of their son, Amin, on 20 March 2003.
An official at the Swedish Migration Board recorded that the complainant's wife had had to undergo emergency surgery on her stomach after having been beaten in Azerbaijan.
The complainant's wife submitted the complainant's Musavat party membership card and a warrant for his arrest dated 15 January 2004.
The State party considers that the allegations relating to the complainant's wife and children are inadmissible ratione materiae, since they do not constitute torture under the Convention.
The complainant's wife also stated that, after they had left Azerbaijan, her mother, who had been in hiding in Azerbaijan for quite a long time, was arrested and subjected to physical abuse.
Nor does it appear that any attempt was made shortly after expulsion to obtain authority to act from this or another relative,such as the complainant's wife in Sweden.
Furthermore, the complainant's wife failed to provide any evidence to support her asylum application.
This arrangement, coming shortly after the Committee had requested interim measures of protection with respect to the complainant's wife, appeared to be an ad hoc reaction rather than part of a properly conceived monitoring plan.
On 7 November 2006, the complainant's wife and children were forced to flee to Benin because they were still facing persecution.
It observes that the State party has not provided any further information concerning the particular basis of the additional national application made by the complainant's wife or whether it may be considered to be effective.
Further, as regards the complainant's wife, the Committee notes that she has not presented any medical documentation or other evidence concerning her present state of health.
In addition, the State party notes that the Department of Immigration and Citizenship initiated a further requestfor ministerial intervention of its own accord upon receiving the communication, in order to consider the new claims advanced on behalf of the complainant's wife.
The Board noted that the complainant's wife did not appear to the board as a person"in shock" during the hearing and that this argument could not lead to a reversal of its decision.
He noted that his mother had received notice a month previously that the Ministry of the Interior had issued a warrant for his arrest forbeing a traitor to his country. A second interview was conducted with the complainant's wife on 18 May 2004 in the presence of counsel.
When the complainant's wife learned of her husband's departure for Switzerland in September 2004, she was unable to inform the newspaper, as her husband was still in detention in Zurich airport.
The State party submits that the allegations in relation to article 3 of the Convention with respect to the complainant's wife are inadmissible and that the allegations in relation to article 16 of the Convention concerning the main complainant and his wife are also inadmissible.
The complainant's wife moved to Trincomalee and he has not heard from her since. On 9 February 2009, his mother's house was broken into by Mr. L.A. and officials from the Yatawaththa Divisional Council and the Matale Development Council.
On the admissibility, and with regard to whether domestic remedies have been exhausted in this case,the State party notes that on 7 June 2006 the complainant's wife lodged a further application with the Migration Board for residence permits for herself and her family.
Counsel further alleges that the complainant's wife also suffers from the same disorder and that she was subjected to torture in Bangladesh because of the complainant's political activities.
With regard to the requirement, under article 22, paragraph 5(b), of the Convention, that all available domestic remedies be exhausted,the Committee notes that the complainant's wife has lodged an additional application before a national body seeking residence permits on behalf of herself and her family.
On 28 May 2003, the complainant's wife lodged an application on his behalf requesting that his expulsion order be revoked in the light of his conviction in Syria and in order to allow him to reunite with his family.
Noting that the issue of the wanted person notice by the National Intelligence Agency on 10 November was also contrived, the State party underlines that both the notice dated 19 September 2004 andthe summons dated 26 September 2004(in which the complainant's wife was asked to report to the police station the next day at 10.30 a.m.) have very little evidentiary value.
The Committee recalls that the tragic acts to which the complainant's wife was reportedly subjected do not in themselves create a real, personal and foreseeable risk of torture for the complainant. .
In the meantime, the complainant's wife had fled to Zimbabwe with their daughter. Both were granted refugee status in December 2007 and are now under the protection of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNHCR.
In addition, the complainant's family found it difficult to exercise the right to visit him because of the many transfers, the remoteness of the places of detention andthe conditions imposed on the visitors- the complainant's wife was ill-treated to make her remove her scarf, and guards were permanently present between two sheets of wire mesh about one metre apart separating her from the complainant. .
As far as the complainant's wife is concerned, a report of the Swiss Red Cross of 25 November 2010 states that she also suffers, because of the state of health of her husband, his aggressive behaviour, and the situation of uncertainty.