Примеры использования Complainant claimed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant claimed to have been deprived of his right to an interpreter.
The State party further notes that the complainant claimed that he applied for asylum on 1 December 2005.
The complainant claimed refugee status upon arrival in Canada on 12 August 2004.
The State party recalls that before Swiss asylum authorities, the complainant claimed that he was persecuted in Belarus because of political activities.
The complainant claimed that the State party presented his case in a selective and biased manner.
No deportation date was provided,as the Swedish authorities have allegedly refused to indicate the exact date, but the complainant claimed that the deportation could happen any time.
To explain this omission, the complainant claimed that the police had asked his brother to submit the complainant's passport.
The complainant claimed that their return to Iran would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention.
In case No. 736/1997(Ross v. Canada), the complainant claimed that his removal constituted also a violation of his right to freedom of expression.
The complainant claimed that he had been perceived as a PKK supporter by the Turkish authorities and was being searched for by the police in Turkey.
In his initial communication, the complainant claimed that his extradition to Mexico would constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention.
The complainant claimed that her forced return to Turkey would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention.
In his submissions to the Migration Board, the complainant claimed that he would risk at least 20 years' imprisonment, during which he would be tortured.
Finally, the complainant claimed a violation of article 16 of the Convention on account of the inadequate health care he received while in detention.
It further notes that before the domestic authorities, the complainant claimed that he had been released after one night of detention, while before the Committee heclaimed that he was able to escape.
The complainant claimed that in case of his forcible removal, Australia would breach his rights under article 3 of the Convention.
In complaint No. 355/2008(C.M. v. Switzerland), the complainant claimed that he would be subjected to torture if returned to the Congo(Brazzaville), in violation of article 3 of the Convention.
The complainant claimed that his deportation would amount to a violation of article 3 of the Convention by France, as he would be at risk of torture in Tunisia.
In case No. 858/1999(Buckle v. New Zealand), the complainant claimed a violation of this right because the courts of New Zealand had deprived her of her guardianship rights over her six children.
The complainant claimed that Turkey was seeking her extradition to punish her for her political opinions; her punishment was likely to include torture.
In the present case, the complainant claimed that he was targeted by the Belarusian authorities after 1998, because of his political activities.
The complainant claimed that§ 21(1) of the Citizenship Act unjustifiably and unfairly restricts the person's rights on the basis of his or her social status or origin.
During the hearing, however, the complainant claimed to have been arrested by the People's Liberation Organization Tamil Eelam(PLOTE) in February 1998.
Although the complainant claimed that her father had taken part in the attack, he did not mention the attack in his application for asylum.
In its decision on complaint No. 199/2001(H.A. v. Sweden), the complainant claimed that her expulsion to Egypt would expose her to a risk of torture, given that her husband had been expelled to that country on grounds of his alleged involvement in terrorist activities.
The complainant claimed that the Swedish authorities did not take into consideration that human rights are not respected in Algeria, which has been in a state of emergency for the past 18 years.
Sweden(CAT 83/97), the complainant claimed that if she was deported to Peru she would face the risk of torture from a Peruvian rebel group.
The complainant claimed before the Committee that his deportation would amount to a violation of article 3 of the Convention by Canada, as he would be at risk of being subjected to torture in Iran.
Australia(762/97), the complainant claimed that his transfer to a prison far away from his family had caused a high degree of mental suffering.
The complainant claimed that he and his family had economic problems because he struggled to get a job due to his political beliefs and membership in the Azerbaijan National Party.