Примеры использования Complainant further на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant further submits that incidents of torture or other prohibited treatment are frequently reported in Ethiopia.
The complainant further submits that the regime in his home country is extremely hostile to criticism and opposition in general.
The complainant further stresses that he never voluntarily confessed his guilt during the preliminary investigation or in court.
The complainant further points out several problems related to the organization and decision-making process of the Appeals Board.
The complainant further alleges irregularities in the State party's implementation of the domestic refugee status determination procedure.
The complainant further states that the Danger Opinion is based, in large part, on allegations made by his exwife.
The complainant further stated that she would not get a fair trial and would be sent to prison, where she would not be protected from the PKK.
The complainant further reiterates her argument that the Refugee Appeals Board should have ordered a medical examination.
The complainant further maintains that the Federal Magistrates Court and other federal courts have no jurisdiction to review the matters of his case.
The complainant further submitted that the authorities are bound ex officio to investigate and punish ill treatment when they have knowledge of it.
The complainant further submits that the possibility of lodging complaints with the Prosecutor's Office does not represent an effective domestic remedy.
The complainant further claims that his rights under article 14, taken alone and/or in conjunction with article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention, have been violated.
The complainant further noted that he was detained in the remand prison No. 1 of Yekaterinburg and that on 9 June 2011, he was taken to the psychiatric clinic.
The complainant further argues that once he has provided a certain level of detail and information, the burden of proof then shifts to the State party.
The complainant further asserts that"her current mental condition is, inter alia, a product of the traumatizing experiences she was confronted with in her home country.
The complainant further submits that the passport number and the address of the residence indicated in the February 2003 arrest warrant did not correspond to his brother's personal data.
The complainant further notes that, by referring to the Manual the State party effectively implies that plainclothes policemen could not have taken part in the police operation.
The complainant further extensively challenges the manner the courts interpreted the facts and evidence in the criminal case and enumerates alleged procedural shortcoming that took place during the trial.
The complainant further notes that he was questioned by the"advisory council" of the Department of Internal Affairs about his ill-treatment only after a press conference was held on 12 May 2010.
The complainant further argued that the doctors, provided by the police, did not consider his allegation of torture during the medical examinations nor in their forensic medical reports.
The complainant further notes that the State party itself questions the validity of this report by supporting three mutually exclusive versions of the events that took place on 8 June 2000.
The complainant further maintains that the State party violated its obligation under article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention to ensure that all acts of torture are viewed as offences under its criminal law.
The complainant further claims that the Iranian Government recently established a"cyber police" unit responsible for tracking and gauging the extent of"espionage and riots" on opposition social networks on the Internet.
The complainant further claims that during the hearing before the Federal Magistrates Court he was unrepresented and had no documents with him because the migration agent had refused to represent him in court.
The complainant further points out that the State party has not provided any information as to what exact actions had been carried in the context of examination of his or his mother's complaints concerning his ill-treatment.
The complainant further underlines that he is already considered guilty rather than innocent and would experience threats to his life by Russian authorities and persons acting on behalf of the authorities or criminal groups.
The complainant further claims that one of his neighbour villagers told him that another participant of the training camp, called"Cektar", to whom he had close contact during the course, was captured by the Turkish army.
The complainant further submits that, even though Sikhs are not a targeted group, there are Sikhs who are targeted because of their political activities or their efforts to get justice for human rights abuses.
The complainant further submits that there is no legal basis in Austrian law for preliminary police inquiries such as the one carried out in the present case, although such inquiries are frequently conducted in Austria.
The complainant further stresses that the State party has not addressed her claim that she was given misguiding advice by the migration agent before benefitting from legal counsel to prepare her protection visa application.