Примеры использования Complainants claim на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In both cases the complainants claimed violations of article 3 of the Convention.
Following the removal of the Qaddafi Government and the establishment of the National Transitional Council, the complainants claim that their forcible deportation would still violate article 3 of the Convention.
The complainants claim to have exhausted domestic remedies, as all of their appeals have been rejected.
On the merits, the State party notes that before the Committee(and as they had already done before the Swiss asylum authorities), the complainants claim that their forcible return to Turkey would amount to a breach, by the State party, of its obligations under article 3 of the Convention.
The complainants claim that there is a real risk that they will be subjected to torture if they are expelled to Syria.
Mr. Dufitumukiza refers to a LIPRODHOR journal from July 2001, according to which from that day there is no member of theC.T. family still alive. However, the complainants claim that the first named complainant and her brother were arrested in the spring of 2002, i.e. almost a year after the date of the journal in which LIPRODHOR claims to have found information regarding her case.
The complainants claim that the main complainant will be detained and tortured if returned to China.
Prior to their arrival in Australia, the complainants claim that they were residents of Longtian, Fujian Province where the main complainant ran a small store.
The complainants claim that their deportation to Libya would constitute a violation by the State party of article 3 of the Convention.
Furthermore, under article 16 of the Convention, the complainants claim that deterioration in the main complainant's mental health and his wife's general health has rendered both unfit to travel.
The complainants claim that their return to Mexico would constitute a violation by Canada of article 3 of the Convention against Torture.
Before leaving Libya, the complainants claim to have received help from a man who informed them that M.A.F. was to be arrested before 1 September 2007.
The complainants claim that their extradition to Uzbekistan would constitute a violation by Kazakhstan of article 3 of the Convention against Torture.
The complainants claim that their forcible deportation to Azerbaijan would amount to a violation by Sweden of article 3 of the Convention.
The complainants claim that their extradition to Uzbekistan would constitute a violation by Kazakhstan of article 3 of the Convention against Torture.
The complainants claim that after their release they started their political activities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, also joining the illegal Komala party.
The complainants claim that they would be victims of a violation of the Convention if they were deported to the Democratic Republic of the Congo where they fear they will be subjected to torture.
The complainants claim that their forced return to Mexico would constitute a violation by Canada of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
The complainants claim that Sweden would violate article 3 of the Convention in deporting them to Azerbaijan, as there is a real risk that E.J. will be subjected to torture, on account of his membership and activities on behalf of the ADP.
The complainants claim that the forcible return of Mr. Aytulun to Turkey would constitute a breach by Sweden of his rights under article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
The complainants claim that individuals returned to Uzbekistan pursuant to extradition requests are reported to be held in incommunicado detention and therefore submitted to a risk of torture or ill-treatment as well as subjected to unfair trial.
The complainants claim that their forcible return to Afghanistan, where there is a real risk that they will be tortured, would amount to a breach by Sweden of their rights under article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
The complainants claim that their deportation to the Islamic Republic of Iran, where they have been tortured in the past and where, in their opinion, there are substantial grounds to believe that they would be subjected to torture again, would constitute a violation by Finland of their rights under article 3 of the Convention.
The complainants claim that the dismissal of all their motions to initiate criminal proceedings, and of their subsequent appeals, raises doubts about the impartiality of the Serbian authorities' investigation into N.N. 's death and alleged prior torture, thus disclosing a violation of article 13 of the Convention.
The complainants claim that they remain of interest to the security police because the first complainant's cousin, Khalid Islambouli allegedly assassinated President al-Sadat, that the Muslim Brotherhood linked to this assassination is today named Egyptian Islamic Jihad with links to Al-Qaida and that the first complainant's other cousin, Mohammed Islambouli, is suspected of belonging to this group and of attempting to assassinate President Mubarak in 1995.
The complainant claims to have exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The complainant claims that his expulsion to Algeria would violate article 3 of the Convention.
The complainant claims to have been in negotiation with OFPRA at the time of his arrest.
The complainant claims that she has exhausted domestic remedies.
The complainant claims that she has exhausted all domestic remedies.