Примеры использования Consequences of a breach на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It may be asked what the consequences of a breach of that obligation could be.
It is highly recommended to read and understood general charter terms in order toprevent unwanted consequences of a breach of the lease in Yacht Charters.
For instance, they may affect the consequences of a breach of international law that an international organization may commit when the injured party is a member State or international organization.
Specifically advise the Prosecutor, the accused, the defence counsel andany Court staff present of the consequences of a breach of the order under subparagraph(ii);
Since the context of Chapter III is the consequences of a breach, just as article 49 is concerned with invocation by other States, the appropriate term is the second, viz., obligations to the international community as a whole.
Iii Specifically advise the Prosecutor, the accused, the defence counsel andany Court staff present of the consequences of a breach of the order under subparagraph(ii);
The consequences of a breach by the State of origin of the obligations of prevention laid down in these articles shall be those consequences established by international law for the breach of international obligations.
Nevertheless, the source must always be clearly indicated; the legal consequences of a breach of this obligation shall be determined by the legislation of the country where protection is claimed.
Specifically advise the Prosecutor, the accused, the defence counsel, the legal representative of the victim andany Court staff present of the consequences of a breach of the order under subparagraph(b);
The legal consequences of a breach of a treaty, including the determination of the circumstances that may exclude wrongfulness… and the appropriate remedies for breach, are subjects that belong to the customary law of State responsibility.
Turning to the relevant articles,the first point to note is that they set out two categories of secondary consequences of a breach: cessation and non-repetition(article 30), and reparation article 31.
Presently, performance bonds are set at 10 per cent of the contract value, but this figure may vary according to the level of risk of default andthe severity of the possible consequences of a breach.
It was rightly stated in the commentary that"States cannot, even as between themselves,provide for legal consequences of a breach of their mutual obligations which would authorize acts contrary to peremptory norms of general international law.
Third, the consequences of a breach of the peremptory norms, as proposed in article 41, corresponded to the effects of a violation of any norm of international law; they were not therefore limited to serious breaches of peremptory norms.
Nonetheless one State invokes responsibility when it brings a claim against another State relying on any of the consequences of a breach of international law by that State covered by Part Two.
The parties may also wish to provide for the consequences of a breach of an obligation relating to confidentiality(see paragraph 23, above) or the use by the purchaser of a technical document for a purpose for which he is not entitled to use it see previous paragraph.
On the other hand, the case envisaged in the commentary certainly could occur:a State might be willing to overlook the consequences of a breach-- as it were, prospectively-- without going so far as to excuse the conduct from its inception.
Potential consequences of a breach of the agreement If you have concluded a consumer loan agreement and breached the terms agreed thereunder for any reason, you may have to pay additional costs:(i) fine for delay and/or penalty;(ii) debt processing fee(e.g. fee for the preparation of the notice of debt etc.);
Third, the question of whether the organization had independent tribunals orother mechanisms for establishing the consequences of a breach of its obligations, without the necessity of recourse to other rules or mechanisms of general international law.
Furthermore, it was observed that the proposed title of the article was misleading because the main consequence of invoking a circumstance precluding wrongfulness was that no compensation was due, inasmuch as the normal consequences of a breach of obligation had been ruled out.
Surely one must ask whether it is even possible,in the case of a“crime”, for an injured State somehow to consolidate the consequences of a breach of a peremptory norm of essential importance for safeguarding the fundamental interests of the international community by agreeing to compensation instead of insisting on restitution in kind?
On the other hand, the deletion of articles 20 and 21 was justified, because the distinction that they made between obligations of conduct andobligations of result had no bearing on the consequences of a breach and did not fall within the realm of responsibility.
The legal consequences of a breach of an erga omnes obligation may be different from those of a breach of an obligation owed to one or more particular States in that, in the former case, all States may be entitled to invoke the international responsibility of the wrongdoing State whereas, in the latter case, only the particular injured State or States may be so entitled.
The establishment of the two categories of crime anddelict altered the traditional view linking the wrongful act to compensation and limiting the consequences of a breach of international law to a bilateral relationship between the State committing the wrongful act and the injured State.
In conclusion, he emphasized that it would be helpful to state explicitly that the draft principles on State responsibility were residual in character and would come into play only if and to the extent that the primary rule orspecial regime agreed to by the State concerned had not specified the consequences of a breach of obligations.
His delegation was grateful to the Special Rapporteur for the thought he had given to the relationship between State liability and civil liability in his tenth report andit endorsed what it took to be his view that the consequences of a breach by the State of origin of the obligations of prevention laid down in those articles would be the consequences established by the ordinary rules of international law on State responsibility.
In response, it was suggested that breach of the draft article 46 obligation to accept delivery fell into the category of general rights and liabilities of the shipper andthe carrier that were not specifically addressed by the draft convention, and that the consequences of a breach would thus be left to national law.
Some delegations felt that the reformulation of articles 20, 21 and 23 was justified because the distinction that they made between obligations of conduct, result andprevention had no bearing on the consequences of a breach as developed in part two of the draft and did not fall within the realm of responsibility.
She considered it inadequate to provide that, while action could be taken against a private operator, the State of that operator was liable only if a breach of a due diligence obligation had occurred,bearing in mind that that was a situation in which there was a wrongful act by a State contrary to an explicit obligation for which the consequences of a breach were clearly established by international law.
Others had taken the view that greater emphasis should be placed on the fact that the injury to the national was the consequence of a breach of international law.