Примеры использования Constitutes an abuse на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication; or.
He claims that this fraudulent action constitutes an abuse of power.
What constitutes an abuse within the meaning of this Article is determined on a case-by-case basis.
Counsel denies that the complaint constitutes an abuse of the right of submission.
Constitutes an abuse of the right of submission of such communications or is incompatible with the provisions of the Convention;
Люди также переводят
Moreover, the present communication constitutes an abuse of the right of submission.
Lastly, the author's quest for justice is fundamentally political in nature and constitutes an abuse of law.
The communication constitutes an abuse of the right of submission of such communications or is incompatible with the provisions of the Convention;
Thus, according to the State party,the police action constitutes an abuse of power.
The communication constitutes an abuse of the right of submission of such communications or is incompatible with the provisions of[this instrument];
In the circumstances,the State party argues that this claim constitutes an abuse of the right of submission.
It thus constitutes an abuse, for political purposes, of the procedure provided for in paragraph 9(a) of General Assembly resolution 42/154.
In the State party's view, therefore,the communication is unfounded and constitutes an abuse of the right to submit communications.
The communication constitutes an abuse of the right of submission of such communications or is incompatible with the provisions of the Convention and/or the Optional Protocols thereto;
The State party further submits that the communication is not sufficiently substantiated and constitutes an abuse of the right of submission.
According to the State party, the communication constitutes an abuse of the right to submit communications and is incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant.
Given the circumstances of the present case andthe subsequent execution of the victim, the Committee does not see how the communication constitutes an abuse of the right of submission.
This delay is manifestly excessive and undeniably constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication within the meaning of article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
The State party asks for the communication to be declared inadmissible on the grounds that it is not sufficiently substantiated and constitutes an abuse of the purpose of the Covenant.
This uncalled-for statement constitutes an abuse of the human rights theme it purportedly relates to, as well as an abuse of the status of the Chairman-in-Office of OSCE.
Firstly, the State party,referring to the Committee's jurisprudence, argues that it constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication.
Such arbitrariness constitutes an abuse of power, the victims of which are entitled to protection and redress, i.e. access to justice, fair treatment, restitution, compensation and any necessary rehabilitation assistance.
Moreover, the State party argues that the distortion of historical facts to the authors' benefit also constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication.
For the State party,the communication constitutes an abuse of the right of submission under article 3 of the Optional Protocol, as it was submitted three years after the adoption of the last decision at the domestic level.
The State party claims that the communication is inadmissible as it is incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant and constitutes an abuse of the right to submit communications.
It challenged the admissibility of the communication on the ground that it constitutes an abuse of the right of submission of communications within the meaning of article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
Yet such a practice is by its nature not one of reciprocity but imposition, andto predicate the decision to give development aid on the acceptance of such policies constitutes an abuse of power.
The fact that the petitioner was well aware of this possibility andhas deliberately not availed herself of it constitutes an abuse of the right of submission of an individual communication to the Committee.
It concludes that, taking into account the lack of substantiation of the claims,the communication is a pretext to request nonenforcement of the author's sentence and constitutes an abuse of rights.
In the absence of any valid reason offered as to why the present communication constitutes an abuse of right of submission, the Committee is of the view that the case is not inadmissible on this ground.