Примеры использования Contractor might на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The contractor might be obligated to keep records of those inspections and tests.
The Claimant expressed its concern that the contractor might challenge the deduction.
On the one hand, the contractor might have foregone other contracting opportunities in anticipation of completing the contract in its entirety.
Providing a full statement of the grounds to each supplier or contractor might be burdensome.
The contractor might seek to include a provision that the purchaser is prevented from adapting the technology, or from introducing innovations to it.
In response, it was observed that providing a full statement of the grounds to each supplier or contractor might be burdensome.
The contractor might. be obligated to make the inspections and tests as soon as possible after the equipment and materials have been supplied to him.
If only one contractor is engaged to construct the works, that contractor might assume responsibility for storage see, also, paragraph 22, above.
The contractor might be obligated to give reasonable advance notice to the purchaser when and where the equipment and materials will be available for inspection.
When a test is not attended by representatives of the purchaser, the contractor might be obligated to transmit the test reports immediately to the purchaser.
The contractor might seek to include a provision restricting the purchaser from exporting the products manufactured by the use of the technology to countries specified in the contract.
An alternative view is that, in order to avoid the possibility of one contractor"cherry-picking" all the most promising sites,the application area should be restricted to a prospective region of 5º square, within which the contractor might select non-contiguous blocks.
The contractor might seek to include a provision that the purchaser is obligated to communicate to the contractor any improvements to the technology made by the purchaser in the course of using it.
When equipment is to be installed by the purchaser or another person under the supervision of the contractor(see chapter IX,"Construction on site",paragraphs 27 to 29), the contractor might be made responsible for specifying and conducting the inspections and tests to be made during the installation.
The contractor might seek to include a provision that the purchaser is obligated to purchase from him, or from sources designated by him, some or all of the raw materials or semi-finished articles needed for the production of goods by the works.
On the one hand,when bankruptcy proceedings are instituted involuntarily against the contractor by another firm or person, the contractor might successfully defend against an adjudication of bankruptcy; the parties may, therefore, consider it appropriate to require the purchaser to wait for the adjudication of bankruptcy before being able to terminate the contract.
The contractor might not be granted additional time for performance if unsuccessful tests have to be repeated for reasons for which the contractor is responsible, and he might be required to bear all the costs of the unsuccessful tests.
If the contract were to incorporate all three approaches, it could set forth the criteria which must be met for variations which the contractor was obligated to implement andother criteria for variations to which the contractor might object on reasonable or specified grounds, and provide that variations which did not qualify as one of those two required the consent of the contractor.2.
In addition, the contractor might be obligated to mark the equipment and materials as required by the legal rules applicable to the mode of transport envisaged e.g., to use the appropriate marking to indicate that the materials are dangerous.
However, if the latter approach is adopted, andthe rate prevailing in the contractor's country is higher than the specified rate prevailing in the purchaser's country, the contractor might suffer a loss due to his inability to earn the higher interest by putting the funds on deposit in his own country, or due to the necessity of borrowing the unpaid amount in his country and paying the higher interest rate on the loan.
In addition, the contractor might be obligated to insure against his liability under any indemnities which he assumes under the contract e.g., undertakings by him to indemnify the purchaser against the purchaser's liability to third persons.
In cases where the purchaser stores the goods, the contractor might obligate him to notify the contractor promptly of any loss or damage occurring to the stored equipment and materials.
The contractor might seek to include such a provision when, for example, the goods produced by the works can be associated with him by third parties(e.g., if they bear his trade mark), and the quality of the goods depends on the quality of the materials or articles used in their production.
If the required payment was not made by 30 September, the contractor might revoke the settlement agreement and initiate arbitration proceedings, which could expose the Organization to substantially higher claims.
For example, the contractor might be required to maintain records in accordance with forms and procedures reasonably required by the purchaser reflecting charges incurred and payments effected by the contractor, and the parties may provide that the purchaser shall have access to those records.
It is striking that these planning gains are not transparent as a contractor might acquire rights, for instance in a suburb, in return for a cash contribution to the city budget, which might be used in housing elsewhere or possibly even for another budget line.
If more than one contractor is to supply equipment and materials, each contractor might assume responsibility for storing the equipment and materials supplied by him if his personnel are to be present on site at the time of supply, and if he has suitable storage facilities.
For example, if the consulting engineer is selected exclusively by the purchaser, a contractor might be reluctant to agree to the exercise of any independent functions by the consulting engineer; or, he might agree to the exercise by the consulting engineer of independent functions of only a restricted scope.
In the event of a delay, loss ormisdirection of the notice, the supplier or contractor might not learn before the expiration of the validity period of its submission that the submission had been accepted; but in most cases that consequence would be less severe than the loss of the right of the procuring entity to bind the supplier or contractor. .
The Contractor may substitute retention money with an“on demand” Bank guarantee.