Примеры использования Counsel argues на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Counsel argues that the same arguments apply in the present case.
Considering his history of torture and persecution, counsel argues that his initial failure is explainable and excusable.
Counsel argues that the State party was aware of the danger faced by the complainants.
In his comments on the State party's submission counsel argues that the communication fulfils all admissibility criteria as enumerated in the Optional Protocol.
Counsel argues that his client was detained"arbitrarily" within the meaning of article 9, paragraph 1.
Люди также переводят
As to the method of execution in California, cyanide gas asphyxiation, counsel argues that it constitutes inhuman and degrading punishment within the meaning of article 7 of the Covenant.
Counsel argues that, like detention, compulsory residence equally limits freedom of movement.
Since most of this information is to be considered as illegally gathered, because of the lack of an international legal basis, counsel argues that this evidence should be treated with circumspection.
With this decision, counsel argues, all domestic remedies have been exhausted.
Counsel argues that the State party's investigation falls short of its obligations under the Covenant.
As regards teaching personnel,which is appointed by the municipal authority, counsel argues that there exists a more than theoretic risk of a conflict of interests, especially in the case of a headmaster functioning as a council member.
Counsel argues that a remedy delayed too long cannot be considered to be an effective remedy.
In his initial submission, counsel argues that the delay would make the execution of the death sentence unconstitutional.
Counsel argues that the State party has violated its obligations under article 2, paragraph 1(d), and article 6 of the Convention.
By submission of 30 November 1989, counsel argues that the central issue in this case relates to the treatment of identification evidence.
Counsel argues that the State party's position also reflects"weak confidence" in the integrity of the Egyptian guarantees.
For this reason, counsel argues that the Committee should declare the communication admissible.
Counsel argues that there were substantial grounds for believing that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture if deported.
In this connection, counsel argues that Covenant rights cannot depend on the internal laws of the State.
Moreover, counsel argues that economic and social factors are irrelevant for the determination of discrimination.
Alternatively, counsel argues that the steps taken to prevent and monitor the guarantees were insufficient.
In any event, counsel argues that the complainant's present condition does not establish how he was treated in the past.
Counsel argues that Lord Gifford thereby failed to make a case as to whether the cautioned statement was forged or not.
Counsel argues that all available domestic remedies have been exhausted for the purposes of article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
Such an interpretation, counsel argues, would give rise to a clear violation of the right to liberty of the person under article 9, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
As to the merits, counsel argues that the complainant's removal to Egypt by Sweden violated his right under article 3 of the Convention.
Counsel argues that the reduction in sentence does not affect how the complainant has been treated, is being and will be treated until release.
Counsel argues that these delays in the criminal proceedings against the authors constitute a violation of article 9, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the Covenant.
In this connection, counsel argues that a real risk of a treatment that would violate the Covenant, can by itself already constitute a violation of the Covenant.
Counsel argues that the delay between the trial and the appeal(51 months) amounts to a violation of article 14, paragraphs 1, 3 and 5, of the Covenant.