Примеры использования Declares it admissible на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Accordingly, it declares it admissible.
As no obstacles to the admissibility of the communication exist, the Committee declares it admissible.
In the absence of any further objections to the admissibility of the communication, the Committee declares it admissible, in so far as it may raise issues under article 26 of the Covenant, and proceeds to its consideration on the merits.
The Committee has found no impediment to the admissibility of the complaint, and therefore declares it admissible.
In the absence of any further objections to the admissibility of the communication, the Committee declares it admissible, in so far as it may raise issues under article 26 of the Covenant, and proceeds to its consideration on the merits.
Accordingly, the Committee finds that no obstacles to the admissibility of the communication exist and thus declares it admissible.
The Committee considers that the remaining part of the communication is sufficiently substantiated,for purposes of admissibility, and declares it admissible, as far as raising other issues under article 6; and issues under article 7; article 10; and article 14, paragraphs 1 and 3, of the Covenant.
The Committee concludes that the author's claim falls within thescope of article 9, paragraph 4, and declares it admissible.
In the absence of any further objections to the admissibility of the petition, the Committee declares it admissible and proceeds to its examination of the merits.
The Committee considers that the remaining part of the author's claim, raising issues under article 14, paragraphs 1 and 3(b), of the Covenant,have been sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility, and declares it admissible.
The Committee finds that no further obstacles to the admissibility of the complaint exist, declares it admissible and thus proceeds to its consideration on the merits.
The Committee considers this part of the communication sufficiently substantiated and,not finding other obstacles to admissibility, declares it admissible.
In light of the foregoing and in the absence of any other objection to the admissibility of the petition,the Committee declares it admissible and proceeds to the examination of the merits.
The Committee considers the author's remaining claim under article 22 to be sufficiently substantiated and accordingly declares it admissible.
The Committee considers that the author hassufficiently substantiated his claim under article 19 of the Covenant, for purposes of admissibility, declares it admissible and proceeds to its examination on the merits.
The Committee finds that the author's complaint in respect of his conviction and the imposition of a heavier sentence on appeal with no possibility of review by a higher court raisesissues under article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant, and declares it admissible.
The Committee considers that the remainder of the author's complaint raises important issues in relation to articles 2, paragraph 1, 17 and26 of the Covenant, declares it admissible and proceeds to examine the merits of the communication.
The Committee considers that the author's claim under article 21 of the Covenant is sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility, and declares it admissible.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that it is notprecluded by article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol from examining the present communication, declares it admissible and proceeds to its examination on the merits.
The author's remaining claim under article 22 is sufficiently substantiated, andthe Committee thus declares it admissible.
On the basis of the material before it, it concludes that there are no obstacles to the admissibility of the communication, and declares it admissible.
Regarding the claim of violation of the freedom of association under article 22 of the Covenant,the Committee finds it sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility, declares it admissible and proceeds to its examination on the merits.
At its twenty-ninth session, the Committee considered the admissibility of the complaint, andin a decision of 20 November 2002 declared it admissible.
However, given that the State party had simply rejected this allegation as groundless, without providing more specific information, the Committee considered thisallegation to be sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, in relation to article 14, paragraph 3(e), and declared it admissible.
The Committee did not share the State party's argument that this claim was incompatible with the provisions of the Convention, since to declare it admissible would amount to a review of the determination of facts and law by Australian tribunals.
Accordingly, it declares them admissible and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
Accordingly, it declares them admissible and proceeds to their examination on the merits.