Примеры использования Delegations questioned на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Two delegations questioned the budgetary implications for UNICEF.
Noting that the caseload for humanitarian action was expected to grow in the future, some delegations questioned whether UNICEF had sufficient capacity to deal with that.
Other delegations questioned the need for a finance committee.
While some delegations felt that the statute shouldconfer a similar role on the General Assembly, others delegations questioned that possibility in view of the non-binding nature of the Assembly's decisions.
Other delegations questioned the advisability of the proposed contacts.
In principle 19, some delegations questioned the use of the word"guarantees" in the context of prevention.
Delegations questioned the appropriateness of self-selection for the assessment, particularly in comparing the old and new systems.
However, some delegations questioned the value of some of the factors listed in paragraph(6) of the commentary to the draft articles.
Delegations questioned the funding approach utilized to implement the initiatives contained in the business practices proposal, and requested additional information.
As regards subparagraph(e) of paragraph 1, some delegations questioned the desirability or the possibility of defining the concept of"complicity" through the inclusion of the words"which includes organizing, or directing, or inciting others to commit any such attack.
Some delegations questioned the value of stipulating that the term of limitation should be"substantial.
Regarding the Myanmar country note, several delegations questioned the credibility of the Government in providing conditions conducive for international cooperation that would lead to sustainable development and wondered if UNICEF could be fully effective in such an environment.
Some delegations questioned the necessity for retaining subparagraphs 1(d)(ii) and 2(b) of Article 3.
Several delegations questioned the meaning, the content and the nature of the term"fundamental interests.
Several delegations questioned the desirability of pooling funding mechanisms for joint programming.
Some delegations questioned the appropriateness of linking peace-keeping operations and development in recommendation 10.
Some delegations questioned the increase of 2.3 per cent in budgetary allocations in the absence of clear objectives.
Some delegations questioned the reference to"other entities or groups whether public or private", in principle 10.
Several delegations questioned why the report on mid-term reviews would be the last when there were still some reviews to be undertaken in 1996.
Some other delegations questioned the need to single out in one article this particular type of cooperation between States parties.
Those delegations questioned whether the same understanding would be sufficient to meet their concerns in the context of the future convention against corruption.
One group of delegations questioned whether these procedures were shared system-wide among the United Nations agencies and other partners.
Other delegations questioned the nature of the participation of the Centre for Human Rights in electoral assistance activities and its related mandate.
Some delegations questioned the proposed increase in extrabudgetary posts, particularly since the staffing of the secretariat had already been augmented in 1992-1993.
Some delegations questioned the proposed level of resources under subprogrammes 2 and 4, and felt that the resources should be more equally distributed among subprogrammes.
Some delegations questioned the rationale of the transfer of demining activities to the Department of Peacekeeping Operations since there was no mandate for that transfer.
Delegations questioned the plan's"legacy and country-specific outcomes," remarking it risked diluting the seven main development outcomes.
Some delegations questioned whether eco-labels, which may not take account of different environmental conditions in the country of production, can provide relevant information.
Some delegations questioned whether attention to goals for children helped or hindered programme sustainability, national capacity-building and longer-term development.
Some delegations questioned whether the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights would be competent to receive complaints under an optional protocol without amending the Covenant.