Примеры использования Does not extradite him на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
By the State where the offender is found, if it does not extradite him or her.
The Contracting State in the territory of which the alleged offender is found shall, if it does not extradite him, be obliged, without exception whatsoever and whether or not the offence was committed in its territory, to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution.
When the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him.
When the offender is present in the territory and the State party does not extradite him to another State party on the ground that the offence has been committed by one of its nationals.
Consider establishing its jurisdiction when an alleged offender is present in its territory andthe Dominican Republic does not extradite him or her.
When the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him solely on the basis of his nationality.
Measures taken to establish jurisdiction in cases where the alleged offender is present in the territory of the reporting State and the latter does not extradite him/her.
The Contracting State in the territory of which the alleged offender is found shall, if it does not extradite him, be obliged, without exception whatsoever and whether or not the offence was committed in its territory, to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purposes of prosecution.
Furthermore, El Salvador has not established its jurisdiction over offences committed when the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him or her.
In light of the decision of the Committee against Torture,it may be argued that the formula by which the State in whose territory the alleged offender is found shall, if it does not extradite him, submit(or be obliged to submit) the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, indicates that the obligation to prosecute exists ipso facto.
Requires Member States to exercise jurisdiction when the alleged offender is a national of that State orthe alleged offender is in that State and the State does not extradite him or her;
If it does not extradite him in respect of such an offence and has established its jurisdiction in relation to that offence in accordance with article 4, paragraph 2, subparagraph(b), submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, unless otherwise requested by the requesting Party for the purposes of preserving its legitimate jurisdiction.
Establish its jurisdiction for cases in which an alleged offender is present in its territory andthe Dominican Republic does not extradite him or her solely on the grounds that he or she is one of its nationals;
Each State Party shall also take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offences covered by this Convention when the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him or her.
If it does not extradite him[or her] in respect of such an offence and has established its jurisdiction in relation to that offence in accordance with article____, paragraph____, subparagraph____, submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution, unless otherwise requested by the requesting State Party for the purposes of preserving its legitimate jurisdiction.
Measures taken to establish jurisdiction in cases where the alleged offender is present in the territory of the reporting State and the latter does not extradite him/her to a State with jurisdiction over the offence in question.
The State party must take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offences referred to in the Convention where the alleged offender is in its territory and it does not extradite him or her.
Measures taken to establish jurisdiction in cases where the alleged offender is present in the territory of the reporting State and the latter does not extradite him/her to a State with jurisdiction over the offence in question.
A State Party may also adopt such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offences covered by this Convention when the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him or her.
Each State Party shall likewise take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over these crimes in cases where the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him pursuant to article 8 to any of the States men-tioned in paragraph 1 of this article.
The Secretariat supports a convention that requires Member States to exercise jurisdiction when the alleged offender is a national of that State orthe alleged offender is in that State and the State does not extradite him or her.
Each Contracting State shall likewise take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offence in the case where the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him pursuant to article 8 to any of the Statesmentioned in paragraph 1 of this article.
Each State Party may also take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offences established in accordance with this Convention when the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him or her.
Each State Party shall take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the offences set forth in article 3 in cases where the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him to any of the States Parties which have established their jurisdiction in accordance with paragraphs1 and 2 of this article.
The Committee recalls that, in accordance with article 5, paragraph 2, of the Convention,"each State party shall[…]take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over such offences in cases where the alleged offender is present in any territory under its jurisdiction and it does not extradite him.
Each State Party shall also take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the above-mentioned offences when the alleged offender is present in its territory and it does not extradite him to another State Party on the ground that the offence has been committed by one of its nationals.
It has not established its jurisdiction over offences alleged to have been committed by a Bolivian national whom the Plurinational State of Bolivia may not extradite on the ground that he or she is one of its nationals, on the basis of a bilateral treaty; or cases in which the alleged offender is present in its territory andthe Plurinational State of Bolivia does not extradite him or her.
Each State party shall likewise take such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over such offences in cases where the alleged offender is present in any territory under its jurisdiction and it does not extradite him pursuant to article 8 to any of the States mentioned in paragraph 1 of this article.
Other courts adopted a different approach, questioning the male captus, bene judicatus rule, judging the abduction to be illegal and arguing that abduction and illegal capture cannot be considered a legal method of arresting fugitives, even when there has been a violationof international law and the State where the terrorist is found does not extradite him and does not wish to bring him to trial.
A fourth question was whether there were specific provisions requiring the prosecution of an offender present in the territory of a State party that did not extradite him.