Примеры использования Enforcement of arbitral awards на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
The Convention is generally regarded as providing an acceptable andbalanced regime for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
Recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
Considering that, in interpreting the Convention, regard is to be had to the need to promote recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
Under the European Convention, the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards is considered only very indirectly.
Люди также переводят
In that case, the recommendation would be consistent with the provisions of article VII of the New York Convention of 1958 on the enforcement of arbitral awards.
The ICSID Convention also provides for“automatic” enforcement of arbitral awards in all states that are parties to the Convention.
That work was vital in order to preserve the efficiency of arbitration anddevelop a legal framework to ensure the enforcement of arbitral awards and decisions.
However, in this particular case, the enforcement of arbitral awards against Russia will be subject to obtaining an exequatur in national courts.
This, of course, includes recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
Among other barriers to the enforcement of arbitral awards in 2013-2014 were mistaken redirections of requests by courts to other bodies, in particular to commercial courts.
The Convention has not only facilitated greatly the enforcement of arbitral awards world-wide.
This reflects the notion that the New York Convention sets a"ceiling", or the maximum level of control,which national courts of the Contracting States may exert over the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
Support in the procedure of recognition and compulsory enforcement of arbitral awards in Ukraine and in the country of the location of the defendant and his property;
The court held that the form requirements under article IV were not to be interpreted restrictively since the purpose of the Convention was to facilitate the enforcement of arbitral awards.
In implementation, have State parties included additional requirements for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards that are not provided for in the New York Convention?
Consideration could be given to the applicability to awards made through the ODR process of the relevant international conventions on the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
The Recommendation is in conformity with the Czech legislation- Act No. 216/1994 Sb. on Arbitral Proceedings and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards, particularly its section 3, paragraphs 1 and 2, which state as follows.
Committee D of the Section on Business Law at its Conference in Paris in 1995 organized a programme on the subject of arbitration and a workshop on the enforcement of arbitral awards.
There was a general consensus that it could be assumed the New York Convention would be applicable to enforcement of arbitral awards under ODR cases in B2B and B2C cross-border disputes, but that reliance on that mechanism alone was insufficient.
This rule is in conformity with the aim of bilateral or multilateral conventions in this matter,which is to facilitate, as much as possible, the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
This is in keeping with the broader objective of the New York Convention to provide for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards and agreements whenever possible, either on the basis of its own provisions or those of another instrument.
It was recalled that the assumption had been made at the twenty-second session of the Working Group that the New York Convention would be applicable to enforcement of arbitral awards under ODR cases.
However, each of Kazakhstan andEngland are parties to the 1958 New York Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards(the“Convention”), although there has recently been some doubt as to whether the courts of Kazakhstan would enforce an arbitral award under the Convention.
His delegation had previously voiced its concern regarding the present formulation; for one thing,the analogy with the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards was not entirely appropriate.
Article VII(1) provides the basic rule that the Convention shall not affect the validity of multilateral orbilateral treaties concerning the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards entered into by the Contracting States to the Convention, and that an interested party may rely on those treaties if they are more favourable to enforcement than the Convention.
During the event, the participants shared recent experience of applying expedited procedures in international commercial arbitration,discussed practical challenges in applying such procedures, as well as potential risks for enforcement of arbitral awards rendered under such procedures.
Both options of the revised article 7 establish a more favourable regime for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards than that provided under the New York Convention.
Also taking into account enactments of domestic legislation, including case law, more favourable than the Convention in respect of form requirement governing arbitration agreements,arbitration proceedings and the enforcement of arbitral awards.
It was suggested that the proposed new text established a more favourable regime for recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards than was provided for under the New York Convention.