Примеры использования Fraud risks на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Understanding fraud risks.
Full history of changes in any agreement, along with the obligatory attachment of the insured objects' photos,allowed to minimize the fraud risks.
Addressing fraud risks.
The implementation of the following recommendations is expected to enhance effectiveness of engaging IPs for programme delivery andmitigate possible fraud risks.
The incumbent would also assess fraud risks in business processes at UNLB.
Люди также переводят
Yara has zero tolerance for Fraud and we proactively combat it in all of its forms,acting to identify and mitigate Fraud risks in our activities.
Improving controls and ongoing work to assess external fraud risks in high-risk environments may result in the detection of more frauds. .
Understanding the types of fraud risks.
The purpose was to more effectively share information on fraud risks and to more efficiently investigate fraud that involved more than one organization.
It enables an appropriate and proportionate response to be developed and helps determine the relative priority that should be given to tackling fraud risks given all other calls on resources.
The Board recommends that UNHCR require country representatives conduct fraud risks assessments in relation to all implementing partners as part of its overall risk-based approach.
In addition, UNHCR will continue to strengthen the capacity for financial management in the field andto ensure compliance with procedures that reduce fraud risks and errors in financial reporting.
The report should also contain information on material risks and control problems,including fraud risks, corporate governance problems and other information required for the Management Board and the Board of Directors.
Though the Board did not detect fraudulent transactions,it considers that retaining accounts with dual roles without proper monitoring increases information technology system security and fraud risks.
The United Nations is likely to be exposed to greater external fraud risks than currently reported.
The Board also recommends that the Administration support the development of the Office of Internal Oversight Services as a central expert resource to support and work with departments to assess,analyse and act upon all significant fraud risks.
For example, DTEK,Metinvest and PORTINVEST surveyed their staff in 2013 on fraud risks and violations of corporate ethics.
In 2010, UNOPS revised its fraud policies and procedures and established controls to prevent, detect, report and investigate fraud, including raising awareness of fraud risks.
The Office had taken firm action butmore work needed to be done, especially given that fraud risks probably occurred in many other high-risk country operations.
All United Nations entities were exposed to fraud risks, and it was therefore unsurprising that fraud cases had arisen, including in relation to pooled funds in a high-risk country operation being managed by the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
This remains at an early stage of development, butoffers the promise of a more systematic approach within the Office to assess fraud risks and monitor unusual patterns of activity to detect fraud. .
UNOPS should systematically evaluate fraud risks and consider how the existing control measures mitigate them, in addition to defining its tolerance to various types of fraud risk and ensuring that anti-fraud controls are commensurate with that risk appetite.
In respect of risk assessment, the policy for enterprise risk management issued in July 2014 requires field operations andheadquarters entities to assess fraud risks as part of risk assessment at least annually.
While more than one-thirdof the study participants(35.6%) estimate their company's fraud risks for the coming year as high to moderate, over 40% of those surveyed consider fraud risks to be low.
The framework set out the Office's zero-tolerance approach and identified three main categories of risk while placing theonus on managers throughout the organization to identify, document and assess fraud risks and to establish appropriate prevention measures.
Although the Board did not assess fraud awareness within the entity,given the frequency of fraudulent events, it is essential that fraud risks be reassessed and strong counter-measures put in place, for instance, by raising awareness of fraud training in order to tackle the problem more proactively.
While in section G of the present chapter the Board reports the positive steps taken by the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs to address the frauds, it also notes with concern that this hasbeen done in the absence of a mature and integrated organization-wide approach to tackling fraud risks in the United Nations.
In addition to conducting investigations prompted by requests from management, the Ethics Office, and whistle-blowers, the Investigation Branch provides strategic guidance andleadership on assessing fraud risks in UNFPA operations at headquarters and in the field and in conceptualizing the Fund's approach to fraud prevention and detection.
Such a unit could assess fraud risks across the system using modern analytical techniques such as data matching, and have the ability(remit and skills) to take on deterrence, detection and investigation of more serious and systematic fraud risks working across organizational boundaries.
To integrate the Fraud Risk Assessment Form(FRAF) in the claims handling;