Примеры использования Genocide and apartheid на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
As examples it gives slavery, genocide and apartheid.
Aggression, genocide and apartheid were all State crimes under article 19, even if they were perpetrated by State officialsand not by the States themselves.
Some violations of this type had already been recognized as international crimes,for example, genocide and apartheid.
The Penal Code, in Section III,entitled Genocide and Apartheid against Groups of the Population, contains the following provisions.
Chapter III of the Penal Code,entitled"Offences against international law and peace", penalizes genocide and apartheid.
Notwithstanding those misgivings and caveats,situations had arisen resulting in aggression, genocide and apartheid, in which the Security Council had been compelled to act as a mechanism of sanction.
A serious breach on a widespread scale of an international obligation of essential importance for safeguarding the human being,such as those prohibiting slavery, genocide and apartheid;
But history testified to crimes committed by States:aggression, genocide and apartheid were examples of such crimes.
Bulgarian legislation which has been amended to conform to international legal and juridical standards does not provide for statutory limitations for the crimes of genocide and apartheid.
On the basis of that general definition, rules prohibiting aggression, torture,slavery, genocide and apartheid, inter alia, had been considered peremptory.
The existence of such a norm is substantiated by references to the provisions of the constituent documents and judgments of international criminal tribunals, starting with those of Nuremberg and Tokyo, and to international treaties criminalizing such acts, as,for example, genocide and apartheid.
It is also clear from the wording of paragraph 3(c),that not only slavery, genocide and apartheid but also other comparably gross and massive violations of human rights may be regarded as international crimes.
Indeed, the main objective of both conventions is to establish legal conditions whereby individuals committing the acts described as genocide and apartheid can be held criminally responsible.
This is true not only of genocide and apartheid but of crimes against humanity generally. The better view is that apartheid is a special case of crimes against humanity: cf. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998, A/CONF.183/9, article 7(1)(j) and(2) h.
That aspect, in the opinion of the representative concerned, was an essential feature of an international crime, and the 1988 Convention,unlike the conventions on genocide and apartheid, met that condition.
As the Commission's Special Rapporteur had wisely stated in his eleventh report, the court's jurisdiction,except for the crime of genocide and apartheid, should be limited to offences for which broad agreement among States already existed, as implied in paragraphs 22 and 26 of the statute.
To some extent, this could be facilitated by the adoption of the code of crimes against the peace and security of mankind,the draft of which classifies a number of human rights violations other than genocide and apartheid as such crimes.
If such abuses comprise war crimes or crimes against humanity,including grave breaches of international humanitarian law and the crimes of genocide and apartheid, they could entail individual criminal responsibility of the perpetrators under international law.
Among the list of crimes contained in article 19, subparagraphs(b) and(c) of paragraph 2 speak of a serious breach of the right of self-determination, such as the establishment or maintenance by force of colonial domination, and a serious breach of the rights of the human being,such as slavery, genocide and apartheid.
Noting that situations had arisen resulting in aggression, genocide and apartheid, in which the Security Council had been compelled to act as a mechanism of sanction, one representative said that ways and means should be found of articulating norms regulating the consequences of those heinous international crimes from the point of view of State responsibility.
The definition of crimes against humanity as a matter of general international law implies a threshold of systematic or widespread violations,either in terms or(as with genocide and apartheid) by necessary implication from the very definition of the prohibited acts.
In this connection he noted that, unlike the Conventions on genocide and apartheid, the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraftand the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation did not constitute the offences in question as international crimes and thus, in that respect, their position was the same as that of the 1988 Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances.
The idea that appears to be emerging is that the mass violations of human rights in the Democratic Republic of the Congo are international crimes, crimes that may be the result of grave and large-scale violations of the obligation to ensure the protection of all human beings,such as the prohibition of slavery, genocide and apartheid.
Mr. Nenadich(Estado Nacional Soberano de Borinken) said that the people of Puerto Rico had suffered brutal racism at the hands of the United States Government and the colonial forces under its command, as well as crimes against humanity,war crimes, genocide and apartheid, as defined, respectively, in the Convention on the Preventionand Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid. .
Articles 162 and 163 of the Penal Code provide corresponding punishment for crimes against national and racial equality, articles 164-166 for crimes against religion, articles 167-169 for crimes against political rights of citizens, article 172 for crimes against economic and political rights of citizens, and articles 416-418 for crimes of genocide and apartheid.
Article 19, paragraph 3, lists four categories of international crimes, namely:( a) a serious breach of an international obligation to maintain international peace and security;( b) a serious breach of an international obligation to safeguard the right of self-determination of peoples;( c) a serious breach of an international obligation to safeguard the human being,such as slavery, genocide and apartheid; and( d) a serious breach of an international obligation to safeguardand preserve the human environment, such as massive pollution.
Thirdly, was there an obligation to take the necessary measures to establish jurisdiction over the offences created by the conventions, even though they had not been committed in the territory of the State party? In his delegation's opinion, that was an essential feature of an international crime, and the 1988 Convention,unlike the conventions on genocide and apartheid, met that condition.
Examples included genocide, torture and apartheid.
Turkmenistan condemns genocide, racial segregation and apartheid, and prohibits and bans all practices of this nature.
The principle of individual responsibility also has been embodied in international conventions on the prevention of genocide, apartheid and slavery, three of the subjects that the draft includes under the category of“safeguarding the human being”.