Примеры использования Group had considered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He said that the contact group had considered three main issues.
The Group had considered the topic of hyperinflation and should continue to do so.
In that context,it noted that the informal working group had considered the following issues.
His Group had considered the subsequent letter of the Secretary-General addressed to the Chairman in a positive spirit.
As no specific reference had been provided,the task group had considered that the criteria in Annex II(b)(i) and(b)(ii) had not been met.
Люди также переводят
The task group had considered that the criteria in Annex II(b)(i) and(b)(ii) had been met for hazard data only.
At its fifth session held on 1 June 2001,the Chairman of the Working Group of the High-level Committee stated that the Group had considered and unanimously recommended two draft decisions.
The co-chair stated that the contact group had considered the issue of the participation of observer States in informal consultations.
Adoption of decisions At the closing of the thirteenth session of the High-level Committee held on 30 May 2003,the Chairperson of the Working Group stated that the Group had considered and unanimously recommended three draft decisions for adoption by the Committee.
He stated that the group had considered a large amount of background material and research and worked on the safety need case.
As such, and based on the information available in the notification,the task group had considered that the criteria in Annex II(b)(i) and(b)(ii) had been met for hazard data.
He said that the group had considered only the issue of welded steel LPG cylinders, and that its report proposed no specific changes.
The hazard data had been taken from internationally recognized sources:thus the task group had considered that the criteria in Annex II(b)(i) and(b)(ii) had been met for hazard data.
By August 2007 that Working Group had considered 10 country reports, making specific recommendations for each context and taking such actions as public statements to parties by the Chairman.
Mr. Bazinas(Secretariat), introducing the reports of Working Group VI on the work done at its eighteenth and nineteenth sessions(A/CN.9/714 and A/CN.9/719), said that,at its eighteenth session, the Group had considered the first draft of a text, prepared by the Secretariat, on the registration of security rights in moveable assets.
On that issue, the group had considered that the Conference of the Parties be given flexibility to decide, and the issue could be raised with the legal drafting group in its consideration of the draft rules of procedure for the Conference of the Parties.
At its seventh meeting(Pruhonice, Czech Republic, April 2006), the former chairman of the Expert Group, Mr. J. Webb(United Kingdom), had informed the Group of progress in the revision of the Guidance Document on Control Techniques for Preventing andAbating Emissions of Ammonia(EB. AIR/1992, chapter V). The Group had considered the document as finalized.
The representative of Switzerland said that, so far,the Ad Hoc Working Group had considered recommendations for Governments, so it would now be necessary to produce recommendations for the private sector.
Lastly, the group had considered the practical obstacles to migrants' enjoyment of economic and social rights, which included a lack of information in a language they understood and fear of expulsion, the monitoring mechanisms developed to address those obstacles, and the use of jurisprudence as a tool for protection.
The Committee had before it the documentation on the subject prepared by the Secretariat(see annex VII). Introducing the item,the Secretariat recalled that at the sixth session of the Committee the legal drafting group had considered and agreed the draft rules on conciliation, except for one policy issue, as set out in paragraph 2 of document UNEP/POPS/INC.7/27.
Introducing the item,the Secretariat recalled that the legal drafting group had considered the draft rules of procedure for the Conference of the Parties at the sixth session of the Committee, and had identified several issues which required policy decisions by the Committee.
The contact group had considered that some major issues remained to be discussed in the information document and had agreed that the proponent of the information document would undertake bilateral discussions, taking into account comments made during the contact group, in order for the Conference to determine whether or not to maintain the issue as a separate item under emerging policy issues.
Mr. KRETZMER, speaking at the Chairman's invitation as Chairman/Rapporteur of the pre-sessional working group, said that,since insufficient members had been available to form two separate working groups, the group had considered not only the question of communications but also the lists of issues concerning reports scheduled for consideration at the current session and a further review of the Committee's procedures under article 40 of the Covenant.
Her delegation noted that the Study Group had considered the possibility of developing guidelines and model clauses and shared the view that that approach presented a risk of being overly prescriptive, as it could limit States' options as they pursued economic cooperation.
Mr. SEIM(Norway), speaking in his capacity as Rapporteur of the Working Group on the Financing of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East(UNRWA), introduced its report(A/48/554). He said that,in accordance with its mandate, the Group had considered the information provided by the Comptroller of UNRWA on the Agency's financial situation and 1994 requirements and had formulated its concluding remarks, which were contained in section IV of the report.
In relation to the latter, the group had considered whether entitlements should be conditional upon contributions or whether systems such as the model in place in Argentina, where the right to such benefits was not linked to status, should be offered as best practice.
In accordance with Council resolution 2008/4, the informal working group had considered the status of non-governmental organizations that had outstanding quadrennial reports for two or more consecutive periods.
In implementation of the political programme, andafter the ministerial working group had considered the necessary guarantees for Syrian citizens who left because of the events, the Ministry of the Interior issued a call on 24 January 2012 for all Syrian citizens who left the national territory because of the events to return to Syria, irrespective of whether they left lawfully or unlawfully and of any proceedings in place against them.
In its evaluation of these options, the Group has considered such issues as.
The Group has considered the possibility of concluding an international agreement on banning weapons in outer space and concludes that this question deserves further consideration.