Примеры использования Indigenous peoples had на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Indigenous peoples had their territory and their own laws.
The lack of nuance in article 28 implied that indigenous peoples had a right of veto.
If indigenous peoples had secure land rights they could choose whether to migrate to cities.
Her delegation strongly supported the principle that indigenous peoples had the right to own, control, develop and use their lands and resources.
The indigenous peoples had an inherent right to land which, although acknowledged by Chile, was not expressly codified by the law.
The representative of Australia recommended that article 25 should acknowledge that indigenous peoples had a right to recognition of their distinct relationship with the land.
As the indigenous peoples had their own cultural, historical and ethnic heritage, their existence must be recognized in legal terms.
Minority Rights Group(MRG) indicated that, historically,the Gambella region and its indigenous peoples had been among the most marginalized communities.
Indigenous peoples had the right to use their indigenous names in the civil register and to receive an inter-cultural education.
The doctrine of terra nullius had been used to deny indigenous land rights, and indigenous peoples had suffered many injustices in past generations.
She stated that indigenous peoples had a critical role to play in maintaining, enhancing and promoting sustainable models of development.
Articles 25 and 26 dealing with the question of lands, territories andresources made it clear that indigenous peoples had full rights of ownership and control of their lands and resources without discrimination.
All States agreed that indigenous peoples had the same rights as other members of their national communities with respect to relocation and removal.
The Committee urged Chile to inform the members of the population about their rights and the legal redress available in cases of racial discrimination andinvited the State party to ensure that indigenous peoples had access to justice.
In 1971, the Commission established that indigenous peoples had the right to special legal protection to counteract severe discrimination.
The observer for Denmark and the Greenland Home Rule Government said that she was pleased to see that article 3 had not been qualified to weaken it andthat it specifically referred to the fact that indigenous peoples had the right to self-determination.
Indigenous peoples had the authority to veto small and medium-sized gold mines on their land, and his Government supported them in negotiations with investors.
The IITC emphasizes that the right of self-determination is not dependent on the draft declaration; indigenous peoples had that right even before the United Nations and many of its Member States were conceived, even before many colonial societies themselves were formed.
Indigenous peoples had the right to benefit from the Goals, and from the other goals and aspirations contained in the Declaration, to the same extent as all other people. .
The severing of indigenous peoples from their lands and territories and the failure by States to recognize the social, cultural, spiritual andeconomic significance of land to indigenous peoples had both short- and long-term impacts on indigenous communities.
They could not understand that the indigenous peoples had a different view of the world from the Christian one, a view centred on the omnipresence of terrestrial divine beings.
The participants were unable to reach agreement on most of the draft articles under consideration and in particular on thetext of article 14, which provided that indigenous peoples had the right to develop and use their own histories, languages and philosophies.
Indigenous peoples had the experience of the Convention on Biological Diversity(CBD) and a number of different instruments, which were not legally binding and did not actually provide protection.
He said that article 3 formed the cornerstone of the declaration, that it must not be diluted oraltered from its present form and that indigenous peoples had the collective right to exercise autonomy and self-government over all political and socio-economic matters regarding the well-being of their people within their external boundaries.
Ecuador's indigenous peoples had enormous political influence, not only because they took part in the process of consultation, but also because they could literally paralyse the country when they considered that their rights had been violated.
It followed that since indigenous peoples enjoyed the right to self-determination under the Covenant, as determined by the United Nations Human Rights Committee which had the specific mandateto interpret the Covenant, then indigenous peoples had all the rights and protections contained in the Declaration on the Right to Development.
The Special Rapporteur also stated that indigenous peoples had the right to self-determination, like all other peoples, and States had the duty to promote and protect this right.
It was said that the studies of Special Rapporteur Mrs. Erica-Irene A. Daes on indigenous peoples and their relationship to land and the study of Special Rapporteur Miguel Alfonso Martínez on treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements between States andindigenous populations as well as the study by Sub-Commission Special Rapporteur José Martinez Cobo supported the view that indigenous peoples had a right of selfdetermination.
Self-determination was a basic human right that all indigenous peoples had by virtue of their existence and meant nothing more than the ability of a group to survive with its own identity.
He said that indigenous peoples had control over the use of natural resources within their territories and any exploitation of resources by outsiders had to respect the principle of free, prior and informed consent.