Примеры использования International responsibility of a state на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Consent of international responsibility of a State.
The meaning of responsibility is illustrated elsewhere in the draft articles,in Part Two"Content of the international responsibility of a State.
Content of the international responsibility of a State.
On the other hand, this issue only arises if responsibility has already been incurred,i.e., if all the conditions for the international responsibility of a State have been satisfied.
Any international responsibility of a State under paragraph 1 is presumed to be subsidiary.
The implementation of the international responsibility of a State.
The international responsibility of a State which is entailed in accordance with paragraph 1 is presumed to be subsidiary.
The implementation of the international responsibility of a State.
The international responsibility of a State for its acts extended to all territories and persons subject to its jurisdiction or authority, whether such authority was exercised legally or illegally from the standpoint of public international law or domestic law.
This Part is without prejudice to any right,arising from the international responsibility of a State, which may accrue directly to any person or entity other than a State. .
That analysis was closely related to the obligation to extradite or prosecute, since it involved determining in respect of whom the obligation existed, who could request extradition, andwho had a legal interest in invoking the international responsibility of a State for being in breach of its obligation to extradite or prosecute.
They also apply to the question of the international responsibility of a State for the conduct of an international organization.
The provisions of the present Convention shall not prejudge any question that may arise in regard to a treaty from a succession of States or from the international responsibility of a State or from the outbreak of hostilities between States. .
Part Two sets out the content of the international responsibility of a State, including in the context of the expulsion of aliens.
For example, articles 42 and 48 on State responsibility could be applied by analogy to the invocation of the international responsibility of a State by an international organization.
Part Two sets out the content of the international responsibility of a State, including in the context of the expulsion of aliens.
The question also arises of whether an article similar to article 34(2) should be added to this part, to ensure that the entire text is without prejudice to any right,arising from the international responsibility of a State, which accrues to any person or any entity other than a State. .
The invocation of the international responsibility of a State by an international organization lay outside the scope of the draft articles, as the Special Rapporteur pointed out.
This introduction must also exclude acts contrary to international law and acts which, although in conformity with international law,may engage the international responsibility of a State, since the Commission is already dealing with these topics separately.
The actions engaging the international responsibility of a State are the same as those giving rise to individual criminal liability in the case of persons who, whether as groups or as private individuals, commit actions constituting an offence.
Article 33(2) says that Part Two"is without prejudice to any right,arising from international responsibility of a State, which may accrue directly to any person or entity other than a State. .
Different views were expressed concerning the title of Part Two, which was described, on the one hand as correct from the legal viewpoint and faithfully reflecting its contents, and on the other hand as requiring improvement sincethe part dealt with the nature, effects and implementation of the international responsibility of a State, which was not well expressed by the term"content.
Although authors generally consider only the invocation by an international organization of the international responsibility of a State, a similar solution would seem to apply to the case of a breach by another international organization.
The delegation suggested an analysis of the following questions:(a) in respect of whom the obligation exists;(b)who can request extradition; and(c) who has a legal interest in invoking the international responsibility of a State for being in breach of its"obligation to prosecute or extradite.
Although the International Court of Justice has not yet ruled on the international responsibility of a State for the unlawful expulsion of an alien(perhaps it will do so in the Diallo case which is now before the Court), arbitral tribunals and courts charged with enforcing human rights conventions frequently establish such responsibility and oblige the defaulting State to make reparation for the injury caused.
With regard to draft guideline 3.3.1,the view was expressed that the Commission should refrain from stating a position on whether the international responsibility of a State or international organization that had formulated an invalid reservation was or was not engaged.
In support of this latter assertion the tribunal cited article 33, paragraph 2, of the State responsibility articles, which provides that the customary rules on state responsibility codified therein operate"… withoutprejudice to any right, arising from the international responsibility of a State, which may accrue directly to any person or entity other than a State. .
Regulation by means of a convention of some of the most controversial aspects of an issue as sensitive as the international responsibility of a State would be a good testimony to the strengthening of the role of international law in international relations.
With regard to the scope of the draft articles, he said that the system should be as comprehensive as possible, covering not only the question of the lawfulness of countermeasures but also all de facto orde jure issues that might arise with respect to a specific act that would give rise to the international responsibility of a State, including the problem of determining whether or not there had been a breach of a primary rule.
However, if the current formulation was maintained, paragraphs 1 and2 should be harmonized by rewording paragraph 2 as follows:"The present draft articles also apply to the international responsibility of a State for an act by an international organization that is wrongful under international law.