Примеры использования It was important to know на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It was important to know the reasoning behind that decision.
You're the one that said that it was important to know what we were dealing with.
It was important to know the number of his room, so that we can take the room next to him.
In view of practical considerations, it was important to know if the meetings would take place or not.
It was important to know what mechanisms were in place to give effect to the Committee's views.
The word“image” had a subjective connotation, and it was important to know how the Gabonese authorities interpreted it. .
It was important to know how they were coping with the new situation arising from the disintegration of the Soviet Union.
Since the percentage of pre-trial prisoners had now risen to 80 per cent, it was important to know more about their conditions.
In this regard it was important to know what the needs of the victims were and how they could be assisted in reality.
The Executive Director commented that in order to fix problems it was important to know what the problems were and to prioritize them.
In particular, it was important to know what percentage of resources would actually be dedicated to the right to development.
While it might be true that no distinction was made between races, it was important to know whether different ethnic groups existed in Portugal.
It was important to know, therefore, how many actions had been brought against its officers and what sentences had been imposed.
With regard to persons who were alleged to have collaborated with Iraqi forces in 2001, it was important to know whether they had been convicted of any crimes.
It was important to know how best to interact with victims and to obtain information without inflicting renewed suffering.
What he meant was that,as the recommendations of the Secretary-General and the Advisory Committee sometimes differed, it was important to know the exact impact of decisions adopted and to dispel any ambiguities.
It was important to know how child-care professionals, especially social workers and psychologists, were trained in Azerbaijan.
On the latter point, it was stated that the key element was not quantitative but qualitative;in particular, it was important to know whether the expulsion was based on discriminatory grounds or whether each of the persons concerned had benefited from procedural safeguards.
It was important to know who was in that minority, as there were extreme cases of people being abandoned in the system because they lacked support.
In order to understand the phenomenon it was important to know its causes and he wondered whether one of those causes was a failure of policy.
It was important to know what action States parties were taking in practice; any mechanism would, moreover, improve the Committee's work and its dialogue with States parties.
In that regard, it was important to know at what point persons under arrest were examined by a doctor and where the medical files were kept.
It was important to know whether the use of contraceptives was accepted among the rural, urban and indigenous populations and whether emergency contraception was widely available.
In this regard, he also noted that it was important to know whether questions devised to determine ethnic and racial variables addressed the population as a whole or just a specific group.
However, it was important to know whether those principles applied to all Zairians, regardless of their ethnic and national origin and to what extent the population was informed of the remedies available.
It was important to know whether there were any such statistics disaggregated by ethnicity, region, gender and race since a lack of strategy to combat multiple forms of discrimination further compounded the ills within a society.
It was important to know which reforms would ultimately be made to the treaty body system in order to determine what action the Committee should take to improve the effectiveness of implementation of the Convention.
For that reason, it was important to know to what extent Mexico was tracking the practice of forced sterilization of indigenous women, which, although not a result of official State policy, seemed nonetheless entirely real.
It was important to know whether those persons were placed in separate facilities, exclusively reserved for minors, and how many minors arrested or detained in the West Bank had been incarcerated in Israel.
It was important to know, however, what the practical results of the Commission's activities had been, as that was the only way that the State party's work to protect the rights of persons in custody or detention could be truly gauged.