Примеры использования Mandatory imposition на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
International law prohibits the mandatory imposition of the death penalty;
To reduce the number of offences for which the death penalty may be imposed andto consider repealing its mandatory imposition;
Subject matter: Mandatory imposition of the death penalty after unfair trial.
In October 2012, the High Court of Lagos in Nigeria ruled that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty was unconstitutional.
The mandatory imposition of the death penalty under the laws of Trinidad and Tobago is based solely on the particular category of crime of which the accused person is found guilty.
Subject matter: Death row phenomenon- Mandatory imposition of the death penalty.
The mandatory imposition of the death penalty with no consideration of the defendant's personal circumstances or the circumstances of the particular offence was declared unconstitutional in Bangladesh.
Admission of guilt and payment of compensation for harm may be taken into account in sentencing as mitigating circumstances, but the mandatory imposition of a minimum penalty is excessive.
The author reiterates that the mandatory imposition of the death sentence constitutes a violation of article 6 of the Covenant.
The Special Rapporteur has addressed communications to a number of Governments noting that legislation dictating the mandatory imposition of the death penalty is prohibited under international human rights law.
The Committee reiterates its view that mandatory imposition of death penalty for any crime is in violation of article 6, paragraph 2, of the Covenant art. 6.
It hoped that the adoption of a multitiered classification for murder would hand presiding judges the power to make a decision on sentencing,and preclude the mandatory imposition of the death penalty.
Furthermore, the Bill retained the mandatory imposition of the death penalty for certain categories of murder.
Considering that in this case use of firearms did not produce the death or wounding of any person and that the court could not under the law take those elements into account in imposing sentence,the Committee is of the view that the mandatory imposition of the death sentence under those circumstances violates article 6, paragraph 2, of the Covenant.
Moreover, the Committee considers that the mandatory imposition of the death sentence on the author raises issues under articles 6 and 14 of the Covenant.
In September 2011, the Bombay High Court of India declared"unconstitutional" section 31A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, which imposed a mandatory death sentence for drug trafficking.On 1 February 2012, also in India, the Supreme Court declared the mandatory imposition of the death penalty under the Arms Act 1959 unconstitutional.
The Committee reiterated its view that mandatory imposition of death penalty for any crime was in violation of article 6, paragraph 2, of the ICCPR.
Subsequently, in its views adopted on 26 March 2002,the Committee went further and found that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty violated article 6, paragraph 1, of ICCPR.
The Committee notes that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty under the laws of Trinidad and Tobago is based solely on the particular category of crime of which the accused person is found guilty.
In May 2006 the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in the United Kingdom decided in the case of Forrester Bowe v. The Queen that the mandatory imposition of the death sentence in the Bahamas was in breach of international human rights guarantees.
The Court of Appeal of Kenya ruled in July 2010 that the mandatory imposition of the death penalty for murder violated the protections against arbitrariness and inhumane treatment and was"inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the constitution.
Such a conclusion rests on the false assumption that article 48 provides for the mandatory imposition of the death sentence in cases where a single act results in several unlawful killings.
That the mandatory imposition of the death penalty under the laws of the State party is based solely upon the category of crime for which the offender is found guilty, without regard to the defendant's personal circumstances or the circumstances of the particular offence.
Firstly, I doubt if it is the established jurisprudence of the Committee that"mandatory imposition of the death penalty constitutes arbitrary deprivation of life, in violation of article 6, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
The Committee considers, however,that the issue of the mandatory imposition of the death sentence on Messrs. Hafeez Hussain and Vivakanand Singh raises sufficiently substantiated issues under article 6 of the Covenant and proceeds to examine this matter on the merits.
In one case involving the imposition of a mandatory death sentence for acts of murder in Ghana,the Committee referred to its jurisprudence that the automatic and mandatory imposition of the death penalty constituted arbitrary deprivation of life, in violation of article 6, paragraph 1, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence that the automatic and mandatory imposition of the death penalty constitutes an arbitrary deprivation of life, in violation of article 6, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, in circumstances where the death penalty is imposed without any possibility of taking into account the defendant's personal circumstances or the circumstances of the particular offence.
In its views adopted on 18 October 2000,the Human Rights Committee noted that under the domestic law the death penalty was mandatory in all cases of"murder" and the mandatory imposition of the death penalty was based solely upon the category of crime, without regard to the defendant's personal circumstances or the circumstances of the particular offence.
The Committee recalled its jurisprudence that the automatic and mandatory imposition of the death penalty constituted an arbitrary deprivation of life, in violation of article 6, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, in circumstances where the death penalty is imposed without any possibility of taking into account the defendant's personal circumstances or the circumstances of the particular offence.
In October 2011,the Attorney-General of Barbados announced that it would abolish the mandatory imposition of the death penalty in accordance with the decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Boyce v. Barbados case.