Примеры использования Missile defence system на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
We are thinking about ways to improve our missile defence system.
A missile defence system undermining international strategic stability has reached the initial stage of deployment.
A similar pattern took place in 2011 when the United States announced plans to set up a missile defence system in Deveselu Commune.
Plans for the deployment of a missile defence system and the prospect of the stationing of nuclear weapons in outer space were further causes for concern.
Moscow is watching with dismay as the United States of America steps up its attempts to set in place its so-called"global missile defence system.
Люди также переводят
As far as this early warning satellite is concerned,it is the eye of the missile defence system currently being deployed by the United States and Japan.
These are now being used as pretexts for reviving a“star wars” plan, a phantom of the cold war,in a variant named“the missile defence system”.
The country concerned has already made it clear that the missile defence system currently under research and development will go beyond the constraints of the ABM Treaty.
For example, we have taken note of the general concepts that Russia put forward concerning a missile defence system for the European region.
We are all perfectly aware that the missile defence system is defensive in name only. In fact, it is a crucial component of strategic offensive capabilities.
Some argue that what the country is developing is just a limited national missile defence system, so there is nothing to worry about.
On the contrary, the missile defence system we are considering is essentially a terrestrial system that would use land-based interceptors, launchers, and radars.
Japan, which has neither apologized nor made reparations for its past crimes,now joins the United States in developing a missile defence system.
Moreover, the missile defence system in question, capable of repelling, at most, a few dozen incoming missiles, was not intended to degrade the Russian deterrent.
Strategic stability was being put to a very serious and dangerous test,mostly as the result of unilateral attempts to create a global or European missile defence system.
Working jointly with Japan, the United States has been researching anddeveloping a full-scale missile defence system that will soon be ready for practical deployment in North-East Asia.
What is most dangerous is Japan's attempt to launch an early warning satellite in an effort to place neighbouring countries under its surveillance andto connect that satellite to the missile defence system.
The missile defence system of the United States is already being deployed openly in Asia, while it is still controversial in Europe, and an undisguised move to form a new military alliance is being made as well.
In the United States, the rejection of the CTBT was a significant step backward,while the proposed unilateral national missile defence system would have serious implications for the NPT regime.
The United States national missile defence system under consideration is not designed against Russia or China but to defend against a limited ballistic missile attack from certain countries of concern.
The impasse in the Conference on Disarmament has been further complicated by developments in the area of anti-ballistic defence systems, specifically the efforts to develop anddeploy the so-called national missile defence system.
They were also concerned that national missile defence system could trigger an arms race, the further development of advanced missile system and an increased in the number of nuclear weapons.
It is regrettable that the resolution adopted last year did not deter the United States of America from developing its national missile defence system, which undermines the aims and purposes of the Anti-Ballistic Missile(ABM) Treaty.
As is well-known to all, the missile defence system that the United States has been pursuing in recent years, under the pretext of the so-called ballistic missile threat from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran, are very good and typical examples.
While we are relieved at the decision not to proceed with the programmefor the time being, we would strongly urge that the missile defence system not be developed or deployed because of the serious ramifications of such actions for international security.
While his delegation supported the conclusion of a fissile material cut-off treaty, it believed that the prevention of the weaponization of outer space was a more pressing task in view of a certain country's determination to develop a missile defence system using outer space as a base.
A typical example have been the attempts of the United States over the years to develop a missile defence system, combined with space weapons, under the pretext of the threat from ballistic missiles launched by so-called rogue States.
Some States were openly ignoring the relevant international laws and abusing outer space in pursuit of military predominance: they talked, for example,about a theatre missile defence system and a national missile defence system.
To exaggerate the threat of missile proliferation andto employ such threats as an excuse for pursuing a missile defence system that disrupts the global strategic balance and stability will not be conducive to solving the missile proliferation problem.
As is well known to the world, the United States, after unilaterally withdrawing from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in the early 2000s,is investing an astronomical amount of financial resources in developing outer space weapons while accelerating its efforts to establish a missile defence system with outer space elements.