Примеры использования Mission considered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The mission considered its meetings with representatives of civil society to be extremely beneficial.
The second critical task should therefore be to build a professional FARDC core force, which the mission considered could be up to 20 battalions.
In essence, the mission considered that a modern public administration did not yet exist in the country.
Although 5 out of a total of 139 lots were sold for a price below the minimum, the mission considered that the advantages of ensuring early removal of the assets outweighed the potential extra income from selling the items as scrap.
The mission considered that it was important for that national-driven consultative process to be completed, in which UNMIT and the United Nations country team are also engaged.
Given the primary responsibility of Liberian institutions for organizing andconducting elections, the mission considered that building local capacities, including for logistics, should be the primary focus of international electoral assistance, which would mostly be provided through a UNDP-managed project.
The Mission considered this particularly important to form an understanding of the situation, the context, impact and consequences of the conflict on people, and to assess violations of international law.
Using the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement(E/CN.4/1998/53/Add.2) as a point of reference, the mission considered the needs and rights of the displaced as well as the responsibilities of the authorities and other relevant actors to address these needs in all phases of displacement- before displacement occurs, during displacement, and in the return and reintegration phase.
The mission considered the security needs and personal safety of staff in the forward bases of the mission as they were dismantled, and in the two main bases at Abeché and N'Djamena during liquidation.
Within the context of its mandate, the Mission considered"recent events" and the"current human rights situation" as comprising events that took place over the period from 1 January and 6 July 2011.
That apart, the Mission considered that its mandate required it to ascertain the sequence of the facts and events as they occurred and to examine the reasons and justification in law, if any, for the above.
This chapter focuses on incidents where the Mission considered compliance by Israel with its obligations under the Fourth Geneva Convention and customary rules of international law in relation to taking feasible precautions.
The Mission considered that the reference in its mandate to violations committed in the context of the December- January military operations required it to go beyond violations that took place directly as part of the operations.
The Cuban representative said that her Mission considered the reasons given as unacceptable since the meeting had been organized by a delegation accredited to the United Nations and convened under a General Assembly resolution.
The Mission considered developments in Gaza and the West Bank as closely interrelated, and analysed both to reach an informed understanding of and to report on issues within its mandate.
Indeed, as shared with all interlocutors, the mission considered that what had been accomplished by Timor-Leste's leaders and people, particularly when seen within this historical prism, was nothing short of remarkable and reflected an overriding unity of purpose and determination to address core national needs as well as extraordinary resilience.
The mission considered that claims amounting to only some $263,000 were sufficiently well-documented and supported by evidence to make them acceptable for external review, even though all of the claims had been supported by the local property survey board.
The Advisory Committee was further informed that the Mission considered as non-core the areas for which responsibility was attributed to specific United Nations agencies, funds and programmes in Security Council resolution 2041(2012), or activities which fell under the mandate of a specific United Nations agency, fund and/or programme.
The Mission considered that the reference in its mandate to violations committed"in the context" of the December- January military operations required it to include restrictions on human rights and fundamental freedoms relating to Israel's strategies and actions in the context of its military operations.
In their reply, which the Mission considered to be unsatisfactory, the Gaza authorities denied being involved in any way with the capture and detention of Gilad Shalit and stated that they are not in possession of any information regarding his current status.
The mission considered it to be important to differentiate the politically driven insurgency from criminality, which is partly responsible for the insecurity, while noting that both problems must be addressed and that it is not easy to draw a clear line between those two elements in the case of Afghanistan.
The assessment mission considered that tensions and insecurity were likely to heighten in some areas as disarmament, demobilization, reinsertion and reintegration, resettlement and the electoral process proceed in the short implementation period left in the Arusha timetable.
The Mission considered that its task was directed to investigating the facts and circumstances surrounding the boarding by Israeli military personnel of a flotilla of ships bound for Gaza and to determine whether in the process violations occurred of international law, including international humanitarian and human rights law.
Finally, the Mission considered whether the series of acts that deprive Palestinians in the Gaza Strip of their means of sustenance, employment, housing and water, that deny their freedom of movement and their right to leave and enter their own country, that limit their access to courts of law and effective remedies could amount to persecution, a crime against humanity.
The mission considered that the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people, including the right to determine how to implement self-determination, the right to have a demographic and territorial presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and the right to permanent sovereignty over natural resources, is clearly being violated by Israel through the existence and ongoing expansion of the settlements ibid., para. 38.
The mission considered that, in relation to the settlements, Israel was committing serious breaches of its obligations under the right to self-determination and certain obligations under international humanitarian law, including the obligation not to transfer its population into the occupied territory and that, in compliance with article 49 of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 1949(Fourth Geneva Convention), Israel must cease all settlement activities without preconditions.
The Mission considers that Liberia needs to be assisted to meet this Security Council demand;
The Mission considers that the naval blockade was implemented in support of the overall closure regime.
The Mission considers that many detainees were not afforded these rights.
The Mission considers that several violations and offences have been committed.