Примеры использования New security doctrines на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
We deplore the formulation of new security doctrines which do not rule out the use of nuclear weapons.
The situation is further worsened by the growing readiness to include nuclear weapons in new security doctrines.
Argentina deplores the formulation of new security doctrines that do not rule out the use of nuclear weapons.
The situation has been exacerbated by the growing tendency to include nuclear weapons in new security doctrines.
In that regard, Argentina regretted the development of new security doctrines that failed to exclude the use of nuclear weapons.
The situation is exacerbated by the increased inclination to include nuclear weapons in new security doctrines.
In addition, new security doctrines that conjure up scenarios of winnable nuclear wars against nonnuclear-weapon States are not tenable.
In conclusion, he called for strengthening the Treaty andspeeding up its implementation at a time when new security doctrines not necessarily based on multilateralism seemed to be emerging.
New security doctrines expound the possible use of nuclear weapons, contrary to the letter and spirit of Security Council resolutions 255 and 984.
And, although the International Court of Justice has issued an advisory opinion concerning the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons,we are alarmed at the emergence of new security doctrines that give an even broader role to nuclear weapons.
Additionally, new security doctrines conjuring up scenarios of winnable nuclear wars against non-nuclear-weapon States are not tenable.
We need at this stage to move toward the realization of this goal through new perceptions and new security doctrines to shape the global and regional security architecture in this new environment.
In addition, new security doctrines that conjure up scenarios of winnable nuclear wars against nonnuclear-weapon States are not tenable.
Contrary to the letter and the spirit of Security Council resolutions 255(1968)and 984(1995), new security doctrines propound possible use of nuclear weapons against the use or threat of use of chemical or biological weapons and against terrorism.
Alarming new security doctrines gave an even broader role to nuclear weapons, jeopardizing the authority and relevance of the Treaty.
Contrary to the letter and spirit of Security Council resolutions 255 and 984, new security doctrines propound the possible use of nuclear weapons against the use or threat of use of chemical and biological weapons and against terrorism.
New security doctrines envisaging the possible use of nuclear weapons against the use or threat of use of chemical and biological weapons and against terrorism run counter to the letter and spirit of Security Council resolutions 255(1968) and 984 1995.
Finally, I would like to conclude by saying that it is essential to develop new security doctrines that are not based on the old ones, to cooperate, act sustainably and take the measures necessary to decisively resolve the chronic conflicts that are the main incentives for the acquisition of weapons, thereby eliminating the sources of insecurity and instability throughout the world, including the growing gap between rich and poor.
New security doctrines envisaging the possible use of nuclear weapons against the use or threat of use of chemical and biological weapons and against terrorism run counter to the letter and spirit of Security Council resolutions 255(1968) and 984 1995.
Under the new international circumstances, the nuclear-weapon States should,as soon as possible, renounce their nuclear-deterrence strategy and formulate a new security doctrine, in keeping with our times.
The emergence of a new security doctrine rationalizing the possible use of nuclear weapons was disturbing.
The emergence of a new security doctrine by the United States of America that seeks to rationalize the development and stockpiling of a new generation of tactical nuclear weapons and their use in conventional conflicts and against perceived non-nuclear-weapon adversaries, continued weaponization of outer space as well as the reliance on nuclear weapons for the foreseeable future as a key element in the national security strategy of certain nuclear-weapon States are more than ever worrisome.
We also recognize the progress that has been made in reducing nuclear readiness in new national security doctrines in a number of countries, as well as in the field of transparency.
The Rio Group also expresses its concern at the possible development of new nuclear weapons and security doctrines that contemplate their possible use.
We express our deep concern with new strategic security doctrines, which assign a broader role to nuclear weapons, imply intentions to develop new types of nuclear weapons or rationalization for their use, as well as to review agreed principles, in particular, the irreversibility of nuclear disarmament.
The current international situation is characterized by a reinvigorated global effort to review existing security doctrines in search of a new foundation for fostering peace and security. .
Moreover, it should be pointed out that having former members of the armed forces in the National Civil Police could be dangerous in that it could alter the essentially civilian nature of that force andtransfer old national security doctrines to the new public security agency, thereby tainting training in the new doctrine and leading to the use by the police of unlawful practices.
His delegation was concerned at the emergence of the new United States security doctrine, which sought to rationalize the development and stockpiling of a new generation of tactical weapons and their use in conventional conflicts and against perceived nonnuclear weapon adversaries; the continued weaponization of outer space; and reliance on nuclear weapons as a key element in the national security strategy of certain nuclear-weapon States.
My delegation believes that a new universal security doctrine needs to evolve.
To be understood, the new national security doctrine must be placed back in context.