Примеры использования Nuclear-disarmament на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
We welcome progress in the nuclear-disarmament dialogue between Russia and the United States.
Taken together, these constitute a significant step towards the globalization of the nuclear-disarmament process.
At present, the nuclear-disarmament and nuclear-non-proliferation regime faces significant challenges.
For Indonesia, these practical steps provide criteria for determining progress in fulfilling nuclear-disarmament obligations.
Last year, Australia co-sponsored Japan's nuclear-disarmament resolution, and we are pleased to be able to do so again this year.
Люди также переводят
It was essential that such a treaty should include not only non-proliferation measures but also nuclear-disarmament measures.
There was general agreement on the final goal of the nuclear-disarmament process, which was to achieve the total elimination of nuclear weapons.
The AntiBallistic Missile(ABM) Treaty must remain as a cornerstone of strategic stability andthe basis for further nuclear-disarmament measures.
The silent-majority States have nothing to put on the nuclear-disarmament negotiating table- except the concerns of mankind and the conscience of mankind.
The recent opinion of the International Court of Justice gives us the opportunity,if not the added impetus, to talk about a nuclear-disarmament agreement.
An inseparable aspect of the nuclear-disarmament issue is a treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices- a cut-off treaty.
It is true that in recent years significant progress has been made in bilateral nuclear-disarmament negotiations between the two major Powers.
We believe that the nuclear-disarmament measures taken by Member States of their own initiative or collectively provide a conducive environment to further nuclear disarmament by others.
The non-proliferation Treaty is the sole multilateral agreement that legally binds the nuclear Powers to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective nuclear-disarmament measures.
It is a recognized fact that the nuclear-weapon States are not discharging satisfactorily the nuclear-disarmament process called for in the provisions of article VI of the Treaty.
The adoption last year of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, which has now been signed by over 150 countries, is encouraging andshould open the way to further progress in the nuclear-disarmament process.
To follow up the resolution, the Government of Japan hosted a nuclear-disarmament seminar at Kyoto in December 1996, providing a venue for prior consultations in anticipation of meetings of the Preparatory Committee.
Jrs/19 The international order continues to undergo changes and developments that follow upon one another andprovide propitious opportunities for promoting nuclear-disarmament efforts and enhancing international peace and security.
We also believe that the highest priority in the nuclear-disarmament agenda should be given at this stage to the conclusion of the comprehensive nuclear test-ban treaty and the commencement of the negotiations on the treaty banning the production of fissile material.
Whereas the implementation of non-proliferation measures was subject to the IAEA multilateral verification regime, nuclear-disarmament measures were not subject to any verifiable multilateral regime.
I should like on this occasion to reaffirm that the nuclear-weapon States, which are accorded a special status under the NPT,have an obligation to respond to the trust shown in them by non-nuclear-weapon States by engaging in genuine nuclear-disarmament efforts.
In conclusion, I should like to reaffirm Mexico's determination to continue to formulate proposals aimed at accelerating the nuclear-disarmament process with a view to abolishing these weapons of mass destruction as a matter of urgency.
These measures should be reinforced by the irreversibility of the nuclear-disarmament process, preserving so-called strategic stability, avoiding the introduction of destabilizing weapons and identifying the key elements for the prohibition of nuclear weapons, including verification requirements.
Ukraine is ready to fulfil its obligations strictly, and I should like to express the hope- indeed,the conviction- of my delegation that other States that have a direct interest in Ukraine's nuclear-disarmament process will provide us with adequate assistance, in accordance with their position in the world economic system.
The decision of the United States to withdraw unilaterally from the Treaty on the Limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile Systems(ABM Treaty) and to begin preparations for the deployment of a new national missile defence system had very negative implications for disarmament andarms control and was a regrettable setback to nuclear-disarmament efforts.
As the nuclear-disarmament process gains momentum, and all States involved agree on proposals for a verified cut-off in production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium for weapons or for other explosive purposes, the Agency's role as a credible verification mechanism for the peaceful use of nuclear material and installations will be more important.
Our support for the CTBT as an instrument of disarmament andnon-proliferation is based upon the view that this Treaty is an integral part of a process which will lead to the full implementation of the nuclear-disarmament obligations set out in article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
China hoped that the United States of America andthe Russian Federation would implement existing nuclear-disarmament treaties as scheduled and carry out further drastic cuts in their respective nuclear arsenals, thereby creating the necessary conditions for the commencement of multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations with the participation of all nuclear-weapon States in order to conclude a convention on the complete prohibition and total destruction of nuclear weapons.
The unilateral actions taken by Ukraine, which affect the interests of all States, may call for measures on the part of the international community, including action by the United Nations Security Council,to prevent any act that undermines the nuclear-disarmament process, strategic stability and the regime of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.
As a member of the New Agenda Coalition(Brazil, Egypt, Ireland,Mexico, New Zealand, South Africa and Sweden), Mexico is pressing for urgent implementation of the nuclear-disarmament measures agreed at the 2000 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and urging progress on the unequivocal undertaking by the nuclear-weapon States to destroy their nuclear arsenals.