Примеры использования Other watercourse на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Other watercourses.
Future agreements that may harm other watercourse States.
Other watercourses within the county include Aliso Creek, San Juan Creek, and Horsethief Creek.
At the same time, States must not deprive other watercourse States of their right to equitable utilization.
The effects of the use oruses of the watercourses in one watercourse State on other watercourse States;
Люди также переводят
Furthermore, the State which implemented the measures should provide other watercourse States with compensation for any harm which might have been caused.
Article 7 provided that the watercourse States should exercise due diligence so as not to cause harm to other watercourse States.
Furthermore, the State which implemented the measures should provide other watercourse States with compensation for any harm which might have been caused.
The effects of the use or uses of the watercourse oraquifer in one watercourse State on other watercourse States;
The other watercourses will be included in the updated version to be submitted to the sixth Ministerial Conference"Environment for Europe" Belgrade, October 2007.
Such claimant States might also seek to exercise the rights accorded to the other watercourse States under article 4.
The other watercourses will be included in the updated version to be submitted to the sixth Ministerial Conference“Environment for Europe”(Belgrade, October 2007) as explained in document ECE/MP. WAT/2006/16.
In its current form, the obligation of watercourse States not to cause significant harm to other watercourse States was absolute.
The other watercourses will be included in the updated version to be submitted to the sixth Ministerial Conference"Environment for Europe"(Belgrade, October 2007) as explained in document ECE/MP. WAT/2006/16.
The 1997 Watercourses Convention has nine articles on planned measures which may have a significant adverse effect upon other watercourse States.
The other watercourses will be included in the updated version to be submitted to the sixth Ministerial Conference"Environment for Europe"(to be held in Belgrade in October 2007) as explained in document ECE/MP. WAT/2006/16.
Most of the water withdrawn by industries andmunicipalities is used then returned, often degraded in quality, to lakes and rivers or other watercourses.
The 1997 Watercourses Convention contains nine articles on planned measures which may have a significant adverse effect upon other watercourse States, setting out detailed procedures to be followed by States concerned.
Referring to draft article 12, she said that the State which implemented the planned measures should not have sole discretion in determining whether they might have a significant adverse effect upon other watercourse States.
As there were circumstances in which unforeseen damage to installations, such as damage caused by terrorist acts,did not necessarily affect other watercourse States, it was sufficient to oblige States to employ their best efforts rather than impose a stricter standard.
A flood, for instance, could be considered an emergency or simply a harmful condition; it was dealt with in article 27 as a condition that might ormight not have an effect on other watercourse States.
Omission of the adverb"readily" would carry a double risk:States might believe they were entitled to inundate other watercourse States with requests for information or, conversely, they might hide behind the word"available" and refuse to transmit the information requested.
That addition, which did not affect the obligations set out under article 12, simply signified the importance attached to the environmental impact assessment andits utility in evaluating whether a particular planned measure would have adverse effects on other watercourse States.
It was thus made clear that the participation of a third State in consultations with regard to an agreement to be concluded by other watercourse States would not lead in all cases to its participation in the actual negotiation of the text or affect its accession to the agreement in question.
It was also recognized that a State's new utilization of a watercourse could not be decided by that State alone, but required notification, consultation andnegotiation if the new utilization might have significant adverse effects on the other watercourse States.
The corresponding article 5 of the 1997 Watercourses Convention defines such rights of watercourse States as the right of"equitable utilization" vis-à-vis other watercourse States, on the one hand, and the right of"reasonable utilization" vis-à-vis watercourse resources, on the other hand.
However, it would perhaps be better to address the issue under part III(Planned measures), and to accept, if necessary,that watercourse States which had concluded an agreement among themselves were responsible for any adverse effects of that agreement on other watercourse States.
Another representative pointed out that, under article 6, paragraph 1(c) and(d), the effects of the use oruses of the watercourse in one watercourse State on other watercourse States, as well as the existing and potential uses of the watercourse, were among the factors that had to be taken into account in determining equitable and reasonable utilization, thus excluding activities causing significant pollution.
Part III of the draft articles("Planned measures") sets out the procedure to be followed when a watercourse State or persons under its jurisdiction plan to undertake a new activity orto expand an existing activity"which may have a significant adverse effect upon other watercourse States.
He therefore proposed, first, that article 6, paragraph 1(d),should be amended to read"The harm caused by the use of the watercourse in one watercourse State to other watercourse States;"; and secondly, that a new paragraph 1 bis should be inserted in article 6 or article 5, worded thus:"A use which causes significant harm to the ecosystem of an international watercourse is not reasonable utilization." Lastly, article 7 should be deleted.