Примеры использования Panel required на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Panel required evidence of the underlying contracts between the parties.
In respect of other losses suffered by victims, the Panel required evidence of the loss, damage or injury suffered by each victim.
The Panel required the same evidence in relation to contracts with Iraqi parties.
In the absence of such specific evidence, the Panel required at least two credible, independent sources to substantiate a finding.
The Panel required these claimants to provide documentary evidence to establish their compliance with each aspect of the eligibility criteria.
Люди также переводят
In all of these claims, the Panel required evidence of the financing arrangements.
The Panel required the same evidence as that described in relation to the claims for export credit losses in the first instalment claims see paragraph 126 of the First E/F Report.
In keeping with the principles set forth by the Governing Council in decision 9, the Panel required the amount of profits lost during the compensation period to be ascertainable with reasonable certainty.
In each case the Panel required evidence to establish that the Claimants performed the work called for under the contract, and evidence that established the value of that work.
All the circumstances mentioned above were taken into account in assessing the evidence submitted in each case, but the Panel required in all cases a minimum level of evidence to recommend an award of compensation.
Accordingly, the Panel required evidence of each dependant's loss and the cause of that loss.
As the Panel recommends that compensation only be awarded where the claimant paid victims in accordance with its own rules(see paragraph 75 below), the Panel required evidence of compliance with these rules.
In such cases, the Panel required evidence that the victims were, in fact, held in strategic sites.
In order to calculate the period of a victim's detention or forced hiding(and, therefore, the amount of compensation that the victim would have received if the victim had claimed before the Commission,see paragraphs 74 and 75 below), the Panel required evidence of the date on which the detention or forced hiding began and the date on which it ended.
For example, the Panel required evidence of the nationality of the victims or the dependants see paragraphs 63 and 65 above.
As it did in respect of similar first and second instalment claims(see paragraphs 160 and 170 of the First E/F Report and paragraphs 76, 83, 92 and96 of the Second E/F Report respectively), the Panel required evidence of the policyholder's ownership of the lost or destroyed property and evidence that the property was in Iraq or Kuwait at the time of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
In all cases, the Panel required evidence that the asset existed prior to 2 August 1990 and that it was owned by the Claimant as of 2 August 1990.
In respect of additional costs incurred to divert, store or re-sell goods destined for Kuwait or Iraq(storage, demurrage, warehousing, additional insurance orresale expenses), the Panel required specific evidence of those costs in the form of, for example, invoices detailing the amount of these expenses and the dates on which they were incurred, as well as evidence that such costs were reasonabley and necessarily incurred.
The Panel required the same types of evidence as that described in relation to claims for contractual losses see paragraphs 57 to 59 and 126 of the First E/F Report and paragraph 58 of the Second E/F Report.
As it did in respect of similar first instalment claims(see paragraph 170 of the First E/F Report), the Panel required evidence of the policyholder's ownership of aircraft and evidence that aircraft were in Kuwait at the time of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.
The Panel required evidence in English in accordance with article 6(5) of the Rules and, accordingly,required translations of all unique documents and sample translations of generic documents.
Where that was not possible, the Panel required at least two credible and verifiably independent sources of information to substantiate a finding.
The Panel required each claimant to submit a"reasons statement" with the claim form describing his or her circumstances during the regular filing period and explaining why he or she alleges the lack of a full and effective opportunity to file claims during that period.
As discussed in para. 141, supra, the Panel required an extensive production of evidence from the claimant, including all of the material identified above.
Where this was not possible, the Panel required at least two credible and verifiably independent sources to substantiate a finding.
Where this was not possible, the Panel required at least two credible and verifiably independent sources of information to substantiate a finding.
Moreover, as with all claims of this type, the Panel required and in this case specifically requested evidence of payment to the underlying exporters and contractors.
In claims where goods were resold, the Panel required the claimant to provide satisfactory evidence of the amount of the resale proceeds, to establish the existence of a loss.
In relation to the spares, the Panel required evidence of KAC's ownership of the spares as well as evidence that they were located in Kuwait at the time of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.
Under these circumstances, the Panel required the claimant to provide sufficient evidence to enable the Panel to determine which portion of the claim has been compensated in the other forum.