Примеры использования Possession of weapons of mass destruction на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Power no longer can, nor should, be derived from possession of weapons of mass destruction, in particular nuclear weapons. .
Mongolia endeavours to establish a system of strict controls over the import,export and internal possession of weapons of mass destruction.
We continue to wonder why the possession of weapons of mass destruction remains the prerogative of certain States.
In short, eradication of this scourge in the region has joined rejection by the region of the possession of weapons of mass destruction.
Bangladesh is against the possession of weapons of mass destruction and acquisition of the methods of their use by terrorists.
It was Iraq, and Bush and Blair were the liars andaggressors as they made unfounded allegations of possession of weapons of mass destruction.
Discrimination and asymmetric possession of weapons of mass destruction will not ensure non-proliferation or regional or global stability.
The fabric of multilateral disarmament and arms control treaties was primarily directed at preventing the possession of weapons of mass destruction by States.
Fifthly, the production and possession of weapons of mass destruction should be totally banned before anti-personnel landmines are prohibited.
Its action was prompted by the US military intervention in Iraq,which was brought about by Iraq's alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction.
It is our strong belief that the possession of weapons of mass destruction in this age cannot provide any additional security to any country or region.
That situation stems from the adherence to a narrow andselfish logic that makes the possession of weapons of mass destruction a political and diplomatic advantage.
Possession of weapons of mass destruction is a kind of terrorism and muscle-flexing by States to subjugate neighbouring or competitor States.
Determines to prevent the threat posed by the possession of weapons of mass destruction by terrorist groups;
I cannot fail to underscore the importance of confidence-building measures in assuaging the fears of States that feel threatened by other States' possession of weapons of mass destruction.
Another terrible risk which was currently recognized was the possession of weapons of mass destruction by non-State terrorist groups.
We are struck by the fact that the condemnations come chiefly from the very same intelligence services that baselessly alleged that Iraq was in possession of weapons of mass destruction.
Discrimination and the asymmetrical possession of weapons of mass destruction are not a recipe for non-proliferation or for regional or global stability.
Journalists investigate the assertions by the Bush Administration concerning Saddam Hussein's alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction as an excuse for the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
The previous regime believed that possession of weapons of mass destruction would enable it to dominate the region, but the result was exactly the opposite: history tells us what happened next.
Considering its resolution 1373(2001) on combating terrorism,which calls upon all States to counter the threat posed by the possession of weapons of mass destruction by terrorist groups.
The possession of weapons of mass destruction is a form of terrorism with which countries flex their muscles and intimidate neighbouring or competing countries, threatening them with destruction. .
They have never honoured that obligation buthave instead encouraged their own possession of weapons of mass destruction and have openly pursued a programme of modernization.
It is also common knowledge that the possession of weapons of mass destruction and the excessive accumulation of conventional weapons, as well as the series of failed political and diplomatic attempts to achieve substantial progress in these two areas, continue to pose a grave threat.
Mr. Al-Samhan(Kuwait)(spoke in Arabic): My delegation firmly believes that the possession of weapons of mass destruction does not achieve security for any country in any region.
The Government of the United States has announced that it has called for a meeting of the Security Council on 5 February 2003 at which United States Secretary of State Colin Powell will present what has been dubbed"evidence of Iraq's possession of weapons of mass destruction.
The proliferation of nuclear weapons is unquestionably a threat to international peace and security, and the possession of weapons of mass destruction is a real and constant threat to humanity's very existence.
It is Israel's possession of weapons of mass destruction- and the most lethal of them, as various international sources have noted when confirming Israel's possession of more than 200 nuclear missiles- that poses a threat to peace and security in the Middle East, the Mediterranean region and Europe.
Since peace and security could be achieved through cooperation and dialogue and not through possession of weapons of mass destruction, the international community must pursue development and avoid the race to possess such weapons. .
That is due to the complexity of the situation in the Middle East, which is characterized by the particular political relations among States in the region, the conflict that the region has witnessed, external interference, instability and a lack of peaceful, just and comprehensive solutions guaranteeing respect for the rights of the peoples of the region,as well as by Israeli policies aimed at the possession of weapons of mass destruction, in clear defiance of the relevant international resolutions.