Примеры использования Prior distribution на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Selection of maximum entropic law of prior distribution of detection signatures probabilities.
Empirical estimates for model parameter values can be interpreted in Bayesian terms as prior distributions.
Now assume that a prior distribution g{\displaystyle g} over θ{\displaystyle\theta} exists.
Suppose an unknown parameter θ{\displaystyle\theta} is known to have a prior distribution π{\displaystyle\pi.
For an arbitrary prior distribution, there may be no analytical solution for the posterior distribution. .
From a Bayesian point of view, many regularization techniques correspond to imposing certain prior distributions on model parameters.
Evaluation of detection signatures prior distribution ob the basis of infrared imageries of reference structures of the three classes.
We want to compare a model M1 where the probability of success is q½,and another model M2 where q is unknown and we take a prior distribution for q that is uniform on.
Looking at it another way,we can see that the prior distribution is essentially flat with a delta function at θ 0.5{\displaystyle\textstyle\theta =0.5.
The result of this integration is the posterior distribution, also known as the updated probability estimate,as additional evidence on the prior distribution is acquired.
Gott specifically proposes the functional form for the prior distribution of the number of people who will ever be born N.
Indeed, parameters of prior distributions may themselves have prior distributions, leading to Bayesian hierarchical modeling, or may be interrelated, leading to Bayesian networks.
For decision-making, Bayesian statisticians might use a Bayes factor combined with a prior distribution and a loss function associated with making the wrong choice.
Instead of solving only using the prior distribution and the likelihood function, the use of hyperpriors gives more information to make more accurate beliefs in the behavior of a parameter.
Lindley's paradox is a counterintuitive situation in statistics in which the Bayesian andfrequentist approaches to a hypothesis testing problem give different results for certain choices of the prior distribution.
The inhomogeneous case attempts to correct this by creating a more complicated prior distribution of objects by taking into account structures seen in the observed distribution. .
Gott's DA used the vague prior distribution: P( N) k N{\displaystyle P(N)={\frac{k}{N}}}. where P(N) is the probability prior to discovering n, the total number of humans who have yet been born.
These results can occur at the same time when H 0{\displaystyle\textstyle H_{0}} is very specific, H 1{\displaystyle\textstyle H_{1}} more diffuse,and the prior distribution does not strongly favor one or the other, as seen below.
The prior distribution p{\displaystyle p} has thus far been assumed to be a true probability distribution, in that∫ p( θ) d θ 1.{\displaystyle\int p(\theta)d\theta =1.} However, occasionally this can be a restrictive requirement.
In either the homogeneous or inhomogeneous case,the bias is defined in terms of a prior distribution of distances, the distance estimator, and the likelihood function of these two being the same distribution. .
The prior distribution from stage I can be broken down into: P( θ j, ϕ) P( θ j∣ ϕ) P( ϕ){\displaystyle P(\theta_{j},\phi)=P(\theta_{j}\mid\phi)P(\phi)} With ϕ{\displaystyle\phi} as its hyperparameter with hyperprior distribution, P( ϕ){\displaystyle P\phi.
When the regression model has errors that have a normal distribution, andif a particular form of prior distribution is assumed, explicit results are available for the posterior probability distributions of the model's parameters.
The present methodology for prior distribution of resources is based on objective data, including GNP per capita and population, indicators that have proven very useful for achieving progressivity in the resources allocated to low-income countries.
Yet, in some sense, such a"distribution" seems like a natural choice for a non-informative prior, i.e., a prior distribution which does not imply a preference for any particular value of the unknown parameter.
Superficially, the methods appear mostly equivalent, but there are some significant differences, especially in interpretation: MML is a fully subjective Bayesian approach:it starts from the idea that one represents one's beliefs about the data-generating process in the form of a prior distribution.
Consider the result x{\displaystyle\textstyle x} of some experiment, with two possible explanations, hypotheses H 0{\displaystyle\textstyle H_{0}}and H 1{\displaystyle\textstyle H_{1}}, and some prior distribution π{\displaystyle\textstyle\pi} representing uncertainty as to which hypothesis is more accurate before taking into account x{\displaystyle\textstyle x.
In modern terms, given a probability distribution p(x|θ) for an observable quantity x conditional on an unobserved variable θ, the"inverse probability" is the posterior distribution p(θ|x),which depends both on the likelihood function(the inversion of the probability distribution) and a prior distribution.
The mission is conducted jointly with the Organization for Cooperation and Security in Europe(OSCE), the United Nations Office for Development(UNDP), the United Nations Office on Disarmament Affairs(UNODA), and the German Federal Office of Economics andExport Control and it is based on a prior distribution of functions and tasks, in line with the respective mandate and expertise of the partners.
Advocates for the use of probability theory point to: the work of Richard Threlkeld Cox for justification of the probability axioms, the Dutch book paradoxes of Bruno de Finetti as illustrative of the theoretical difficulties that can arise from departures from the probability axioms, and the complete class theorems,which show that all admissible decision rules are equivalent to the Bayesian decision rule for some utility function and some prior distribution or for the limit of a sequence of prior distributions. .
For example, if one is using a beta distribution to model the distribution of the parameter p of a Bernoulli distribution, then: p is a parameter of the underlying system(Bernoulli distribution), and α and β are parameters of the prior distribution(beta distribution), hence hyperparameters.