Примеры использования Proposal by belgium на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Proposal by Belgium.
GRSG welcomed the proposal by Belgium.
The proposal by Belgium was not adopted.
If not, it would not be possible to secure France's agreement to the proposal by Belgium and the Netherlands.
The proposal by Belgium thus became redundant.
CD/NTB/WP.301, dated 12 February 1996, submitted by the delegation of Belgium, entitled"Article 12: Proposal by Belgium.
The proposal by Belgium was used as a basis for discussion.
Following the discussion, GRSG preferred to resume consideration at its next session in October 2013, on the basis of a concrete proposal by Belgium.
The proposal by Belgium was adopted with some drafting corrections.
The majority of delegations considered that it was preferable for ADN users to have all the applicable provisions to hand and the proposal by Belgium was not adopted.
The proposal by Belgium and the Netherlands was adopted but the wording of the paragraph was amended.
The Joint Meeting adopted a text on the basis of a proposal by Belgium(INF.3) as revised by a drafting group(INF.3/Rev.1) see para. 119 and Addendum 3.
The proposal by Belgium to replace the word"steersman" by"master" in the English text was adopted.
The Joint Meeting considered, however, that work should continue on the order of precedence of the codes and the assignment of codes in thetable in chapter 3.2, and asked the Working Group on the Restructuring of RID to continue while taking into account the proposal by Belgium if it deemed it appropriate at this stage.
GRSG noted a proposal by Belgium on the need to develop a new UN Regulation on odometer equipment.
GRSG noted the submission of a proposal by Belgium on the need to develop a UN Regulation on odometer equipment.
The proposal by Belgium that the wording of special provision 584 should be amended was adopted with some modifications see annex 1 to the report.
Other delegations on the contrary considered that the proposal by Belgium was in keeping with the principle of user-friendliness in the restructuring and supported it.
The proposal by Belgium in document TRANS/WP.15/AC.1/2003/49 to delete paragraphs 1.X.2.3 and 1.X.2.4 as redundant in view of paragraphs 1.3.1 and 1.3.3 was adopted.
The Working Group will,in particular, consider the proposal by Belgium, Denmark and Italy, as contained in annex II to the report of its sixth session(CEP/AC.3/12), for inclusion in the convention.
The proposal by Belgium that the identification of the transport unit and of the vehicle crew should be required was not adopted.
The Joint Meeting accepted the proposal by Belgium(INF.5) to add a definition e1 to the footnote on page 4(minimum thickness of the shell in mm for the metal selected) to 6.8.2.1.18.
The proposal by Belgium to bring transitional measure 1.6.2.5 into line with new transitional measures 1.6.3.38 and 1.6.4.39 was adopted see annex I.
The Joint Meeting adopted the proposal by Belgium to amend the first paragraph of special provision VV15, but lowered the maximum concentration of the materials to 1%(i.e., 10,000 mg/kg) from 5% see annex II.
The proposal by Belgium to eliminate such differences as far as possible was recalled at this point Würzburg report,-/document 1998/25, para. 53.
The Working Party did not adopt the proposal by Belgium to revoke the decision of the Joint Meeting to delete from P203 the provisions specific to RID/ADR/ADN relating to the periodic inspection of closed cryogenic receptacles.
The proposal by Belgium to include in Part 8 a reference to Chapters 5.3(Marking of vehicles) and to section 8.5(special provision S07 respiratory protection) was adopted see annex 1.
The General Assembly decided, on the proposal by Belgium, that the initial debate on item 166 would be held in the plenary as early as possible, on the understanding that the consideration of the technical aspects of the item would remain in the Sixth Committee.
The proposal by Belgium to inform the other Contracting Parties of the official language or languages applicable throughout the territory or in each region under marginal 10 385 was adopted.
Contrary to the proposal by Belgium, the working group recommended the inclusion of article 3(exemptions), since the possibilities of exemption in force in the European Union States should also be valid for States which were not members of the European Union.