Примеры использования Reported that they had taken на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Israel and Lithuania reported that they had taken no measures in this regard.
Most States that sent replies to the questionnaire reported that they had taken such measures.
Fifteen States reported that they had taken action in compliance with paragraph 3(a) and b.
As regards action taken pursuant to those agreements,only three Member States reported that they had taken action with a number of countries ranging from six to eight.
Two States reported that they had taken action in compliance with paragraph 3(a) and(b) of the resolution.
Several respondents(Bahrain, Cambodia, Canada, EC, Kuwait, Morocco, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Spain, United States, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,Yemen) reported that they had taken measures individually and/or within RFMO/As of which they were members to reduce by-catch of non-target species and juvenile fish.
The Governments reported that they had taken steps to give effect to the various recommendations of the Congress on the four substantive topics.
With regard to international cooperation in kidnapping cases, the majority of States reported that they had taken initiatives to improve international cooperation with respect to issues of police and judicial cooperation.
Several States reported that they had taken measures to implement their commitments to reducing the capacity of the world's fishing fleets to levels commensurate with the sustainability of fish stocks.
More than half of the responding States(55 per cent) reported that they had taken measures to enhance cooperation with the chemical industry to prevent the diversion of precursors for ATS.
Two States reported that they had taken action in compliance with subparagraph 3(b) of the resolution and indicated that they did not have diplomatic representation in the Sudan nor did the Sudan have diplomatic representation in their country.
The remaining two States reported that they had taken action in compliance with paragraph 3(a) and(b) of the resolution.
In addition, some States reported that they had taken measures to contribute to the development of regional guidelines for adequate sanctions for non-compliance with fishery regulations by vessels flying their flags.
Canada, EC, Ecuador, Fiji, Latvia, Morocco, Norway, Peru, Spain andthe United States reported that they had taken measures to close their ports to illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing vessels in order to deny fish or fish products originating from illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing activities access to their markets.
Two States reported that they had taken appropriate measures in compliance with paragraph 3(b) and further indicated that, as they did not have diplomatic representation in the Sudan nor did the Sudan have diplomatic representation in their country, no action was required by them under paragraph 3(a) of the resolution.
The majority of States reported that they had taken a series of initiatives to improve international cooperation in respect of issues of police and judicial cooperation.
Many States reported that they had taken a series of initiatives to increase cooperation with their neighbouring countries, as well as with the main countries of origin, transit or destination connected to their territories by trafficking routes, addressing the whole range of issues involved, including prevention, police and legal cooperation, victim support and reintegration.
Also, very few countries reported that they had taken into account, in the process of target setting, emerging issues relevant to water and health e.g., climate change.
Sixteen others reported that they had taken appropriate measures in compliance with paragraph 3(b), eight of which added that, as they did not have diplomatic representation in the Sudan nor did the Sudan have diplomatic representation in their country, no action was required by them under paragraph 3(a) of the resolution.
Croatia, Slovakia and Slovenia reported that they had taken relevant measures in line with the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 1988.
Five other States reported that they had taken appropriate measures in compliance with paragraph 3(b); two of these added that as they did not have diplomatic representation in the Sudan nor did the Sudan have diplomatic representation in their country, no action was required by them under paragraph 3(a) of the resolution; two of the remaining three States indicated that they did not have diplomatic representation in the Sudan nor did the Sudan have diplomatic representation in their country.
The authorities of the United Arab Emirates reported that they had taken measures to foster law enforcement cooperation particularly through strengthening communication channels with counterparts in other States parties.
Many Member States reported that they had taken the necessary steps to ensure the widest possible dissemination of the relevant counter-piracy guidance and IMO recommendations to the shipping industry and others.
On the basis of this status,particularly given that 56 States Parties had not yet reported that they had taken any legislative measures in accordance with Article 9, it was noted that a challenge for the period 2005 to 2009 is for all States Parties that have not yet done so to ensure that they have in place the legislative measures required by Article 9 and to report on such measures in accordance with Article 7.
The majority of States reported that they had taken a series of initiatives to increase cooperation with their neighbouring countries, as well as with the main countries of origin of the victims found in their territories, addressing the whole range of issues involved, including prevention, police and legal cooperation, victim support and reintegration.
Morocco, New Zealand, Pakistan, Portugal andthe United States reported that they had taken measures to minimize catch of non-target species, such as the use of turtle excluding devices, mesh size limitations, confiscation of catches, the prohibition of landings of juveniles and/or discards, levies on by-catch, and season/area closures of fishing grounds to limit by-catch and discards.
United Nations agencies, funds and programmes with country orregional offices report that they have taken measures to increase their local institutional capacity.
Belize, the European Community, Myanmar,* Morocco,* New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan,* the Philippines,* Portugal, Qatar,* Saudi Arabia,* Serbia and Montenegro,* the United Kingdom andthe United States report that they have taken technical measures to minimize the catch of non-target species.
Fifty-seven(57) States Parties have not yet reported that they have taken any legislative measures in accordance with Article 9.
Five States Parties have reported that they have taken action to promote universalization of the Convention in 2012: Canada, Germany, Portugal, United Kingdom, United States.