Примеры использования Response to a suggestion на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In response to a suggestion by the CHAIRMAN, Mr. SOUFAN(Lebanon) said that his delegation would respond to the Committee's questions the following morning.
Mrs. CHANET(Rapporteur) said that following amendments at the final stage of drafting,and notably in response to a suggestion by Mr. Buergenthal, the original text should be replaced by.
In response to a suggestion, it was agreed that paragraph 49 would be revised to refer to dispute settlement in general, rather than specifically to arbitral proceedings.
The first version of the United Nations System of Environmental-Economic Accounting(SEEA)was produced in 1993 in response to a suggestion in Agenda 21, the plan of action set at the first United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, which was held in 1992.
In response to a suggestion that paragraph(3) should be prescriptive, the point was made that not all listed items would necessarily be required to be included in the description of the subject matter of the procurement.
Люди также переводят
Furthermore, WIPO facilitated the participation of professors andresearchers in intellectual property law from developing countries in meetings organized by WIPO or, in response to a suggestion of WIPO, by the International Association for the Advancement of Teaching and Research in Intellectual Property.
In response to a suggestion that the recommendation might usefully refer to suspect periods in respect of related persons, it was pointed out that that issue was addressed in recommendation 72.
The United States Geological Survey has been invited by the Government of Liberia to undertake a geological survey in response to a suggestion from the Kimberley Process that a production estimate should be developed as soon as possible; however, funding for such a project has not yet been identified.
In response to a suggestion to establish in the UNCITRAL secretariat a focal point for contacts with delegates, it was explained that the centralized mail box of UNCITRAL uncitral@uncitral. org was already treated as such.
With regard to"financial institutions",it was agreed that any definition should envisage a wider application than banks and, in response to a suggestion that"financial intermediary" might be preferable, it was pointed out that the term to be used should include parties to a financial contract which"financial intermediary" would not.
In response to a suggestion that the Guide note the need to address the issue and cite possible approaches, it was observed that the issue was of particular importance and required the provision of specific guidance.
The representative noted that the European Community was presenting the proposed decision in response to a suggestion by the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel in its report that there be a review in 2005 of 2006 essential-use exemptions for(CFCs) because of possible changing regulatory circumstances for CFC-containing salbutamol in 2005.
In response to a suggestion by a delegation, the Steering Body requested the secretariat to make the presentations made during the session that it received electronically available on the Internet. It will use www. unece. org/env/emep.
In response to a suggestion to include in draft article 27 a provision regarding the possibility of cross-examining witnesses, it was clarified that there were no restrictions under draft article 27 as to the manner in which witnesses might be examined.
In response to a suggestion that the arbitral tribunal could obtain guidance by consulting the parties, it was stated that the parties, having their own personal interests in the matter, might not be best placed to advise the arbitral tribunal on that matter.
In response to a suggestion he had made at the last session of the General Conference that the next session of the Conference might be held in a developing region,a number of countries had expressed interest in hosting the session.
In response to a suggestion by one delegation, the secretariat informed the Committee that, as part of its programme of work, it would support closer collaboration with other divisions within the secretariat to enhance the use of statistics compiled by the secretariat.
In response to a suggestion that UNICEF should consider developing a communication manual to help guide country office staff in their work, the Director, DOC, said that a UNICEF Information Manual had been issued four years ago.
In response to a suggestion that the data could be checked by comparing reported consumption with reported exports from other Parties, the representative of the Secretariat observed that no Party had ever reported exports to Somalia.
In response to a suggestion from the Board that the Committee's visibility be increased on the Fund's website to reflect the critical role played by the Committee in the Fund's governance structure, the Chair of the Committee noted that the proposal should be considered by the Fund secretariat.
In response to a suggestion that the requirement for an"urgent" public interest might not encompass the full scope of the exception in paragraph 4(b) it was considered that the term"urgent" was sufficiently broad to encompass not only urgency in terms of time but also the extent of the public interest.
In response to a suggestion that the words"ODR provider" throughout the article be placed in square brackets, it was clarified that, further to the outcome of the deliberations of the Working Group in relation to this matter in paragraphs 48-57, the appropriate phrase would be incorporated throughout the draft Rules.
In response to a suggestion that specific mention needed to be made of acts of omission, the Commission took the view that the existing wording,"an act or decision of, or procedure followed by, the procuring entity", was sufficient to cover acts of commission and acts of omission.
In response to a suggestion that reference to higher-value procurement should be included in paragraph 4, it was agreed that there was no need for such a reference and, indeed, the reference to complex procurement should be eliminated, since both were outside the scope of article 28 2.
In response to a suggestion that legislative recommendations 1(a) and 1(b) should be combined, the view was expressed that, in the revision of the legislative recommendations, it was advisable to avoid confusion as to the different situations that might give rise to interruptions in the execution of the project.
In response to a suggestion that the recommendation should perhaps make a distinction between sales in liquidation and reorganization, it was noted that the purpose of the provision was to address the issue of sales outside the ordinary course of business, whether in liquidation or reorganization.
In response to a suggestion that overreaching by the secured creditor should be discussed in paragraph 7 in more detail, it was noted that the matter should be discussed together with the issue of over-collateralization in the context of chapter III, dealing with the creation of the security right see A/CN.9/WG. VI/WP.6/Add.3, para. 26.
In response to a suggestion that footnotes 22 and 23 conveyed new explanations or repeated information set forth in other recommendations or in the commentary, and might not be required, it was noted that such explanations and reminders were found elsewhere in the footnotes included in the Guide and served to emphasize several key points.
In response to a suggestion that the existence of public interest issues should guide the arbitral tribunal in its decision, it was said that treaty-based investor-State arbitration involved, by nature, public interest because such arbitration implicated a State's exercise of discretionary powers.