Примеры использования Right to personal freedom на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Right to personal freedom.
Everyone has the right to personal freedom.
Right to personal freedom and security and State protection.
Everyone shall have the right to personal freedom.
The right to personal freedom.
According to article 16 of the Constitution, everyone has the right to personal freedom.
Everyone has the right to personal freedom and safety.
Right to personal freedom(refers to deprivation of liberty, detention) Article 29- 30.
Everyone shall have the right to personal freedom and security.
The resident may appoint a close relative, a lawyer, ora notary public to represent him or her in the safeguarding of his or her right to personal freedom.
The Constitution of the Republic of Armenia ensures the right to personal freedom and personal inviolability.
The right to personal freedom is being approached from a completely different aspect by the State Liability Act[12] that is currently under discussion in Riigikogu- it also deals with compensation for unjust deprivation of liberty.
Article 16, paragraph 1, of the Constitution reads:"Everyone has the right to personal freedom and safety.
Furthermore, article 16 grants the right to personal freedom, sets the legal time limit for police custody at 72 hours, and contains provisions for legal aid and the right to appeal.
The Constitution acknowledges in article 16, paragraph 1,that everyone has the right to personal freedom and safety.
Article 19, paragraph 7, of the Chilean Constitution guarantees the right to personal freedom and individual security for all, without any distinction of race or ethnic origin.
In this connection it must be said that in Peru the Constitution lays down the cases in which a person may be arrested;'Everyone has the right to personal freedom and security'. Consequently.
The Court also ruled that Turkey has violated the right to life and the right to personal freedom of the persons missing since the Turkish invasion and has persistently denied an adequate investigation into their fate, in respect of whom there is an arguable claim that they were in Turkish custody at the time of their disappearance.
The provisions regarding arrest on suspicion(detención por sospecha) should be amended in order to ensure that such arrest only takes place in strictly controlled circumstances and in accordance with national andinternational standards guaranteeing the right to personal freedom.
For example, the amparo remedy ensured efficient exercise of all constitutional rights, including the right to personal freedom, health, access to medicine for persons with HIV, and the right of pregnant women to continue working.
In the case cited above, the Court of Appeal of Tanzania relied on the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights to interpret the obligations of Tanzania under Article 15 of the Constitution which provides for the right to personal freedom.
The States of Emergency(Organization)Act adopted in 2001 clearly stipulated that no derogation was possible from the right to life, the right to personal freedom, protection against enforced disappearance, the right to physical, mental and moral integrity, and the right not to be enslaved.
It should be noted that these provisions do not reflect any value judgements regarding the functioning of the judiciary or undermine in any way whatsoever their authority to conduct the administration of justice, butare designed only to strengthen the right to personal freedom.
Although the draft code does not address the issue of medical examination,which does not concern criminal procedure proper but rather the right to personal freedom, suspects have the right, as hitherto, to be examined by an independent doctor on their arrest and each time thereafter that they so request.
The remedy of amparo is also based on article 48 of the Constitution, which establishes the right of any person to use the remedy to maintain or re-establish their enjoyment of thefundamental rights embodied in the Constitution, other than the right to personal freedom and integrity, which is protected by habeas corpus.
Similarly, closely linked to the right to personal freedom guaranteed under domestic legislation, and in response to an observation by the Committee against Torture made in connection with the submission of previous reports, it should be noted that habeas corpus and amparo have been strengthened in the new Constitution, article 93 of which reads.
In order to guarantee this important right to personal freedom and individual security and given that it has a bearing on"incommunicado detention of an individual in criminal matters", the new Code of Criminal Procedure lists among the rights of defendants deprived of liberty that they are always entitled to"receive visitors and communicate in writing or in any other way, except as provided in article 151" of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Some clarification is nevertheless needed in respect of paragraph 3 of the initial report. Article 10, paragraph 2,of the Federal Constitution guarantees personal freedom in the following terms:"Every human being has the right to personal freedom, and in particular to physical and mental integrity, and to freedom of movement.
The Working Group, conscious of the fact that the existence of such courts may seriously affect,inter alia, the right to personal freedom which is the object of its mandate, but at the same time understanding the need to ensure the life and physical integrity of judges and their families, hopes that this issue can be discussed with the Special Rapporteur on the Independence of the Judiciary at the next meeting of special rapporteurs and chairmen of working groups.