Примеры использования States have expressed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Fourteen States have expressed the intention to implement the WCO SAFE Framework of Standards.
It will enter into force six months after the date on which 10 States have expressed their consent to be bound by it.
Some States have expressed concern over what kind of impact these developments might have on the process.
This Convention shall enter into force.following the date on which… States have expressed their consent to be bound by it.
Certain States have expressed support for the terrorists and advocated arming them in order to attack Syria.
It will enter into force six months following the date on which 10 States have expressed their consent to be bound by it.
However, some States have expressed an interest in developing guidelines similar to those set out in INFCIRC/549.
Protocol V entered into force on 12 November 2006 andso far only 32 States have expressed their consent to be bound by it.
To date, only 10 States have expressed their willingness to enforce the prison sentences of the International Tribunal.
This Convention shall enter into force six months following the date on which 10 States have expressed their consent to be bound by it.
Since all States have expressed their positions through extended debates, the actions required have become clearer and more specific.
It is significant that many of the disputes that have come before the Court during the reporting period involve contentious issues of international law over which States have expressed divergent or sometimes diametrically opposed views.
Some States have expressed the view that several of the existing mechanisms might not be perfect and that new ones might be elaborated if required.
The Federal Government andother arms of government including the States have expressed their readiness to work at equality of men and women in fulfilment of the Constitutional provisions.
Most States have expressed their intention to implement the WCO SAFE Framework of Standards, and most have moved to implement its standards.
This Convention shall enter into force on the first day of the month following the expiration of a period of three months after the date on which fourteenth States have expressed their consent to be bound by the Convention in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1.
In the interim, small island developing States have expressed their interest in a facility for the deployment of short-term experts to bridge skills gaps.
In making this assumption, the Committee is forgetting that these instruments, even though they are designed to protect individuals, are still treaties: it is true that they benefit individuals directly,but only because- and after- States have expressed their willingness to be bound by them.
States have expressed growing interest in establishing formal statelessness determination procedures, with ten States having formally pledged to do so.
While it may not be a common practice, Al-Qaida terrorists will use whatever means they can to establish themselves,including by claiming asylum, and many States have expressed concern to the Team that other States are allowing terrorists to claim(and obtain) asylum to avoid extradition and prosecution for their crimes.
Some States have expressed concern that if the estate of a dead person is no longer subject to the assets freeze, it may be used to fund terrorism.
For example, the seventh preambular paragraph claims that the nuclear-weapon States have expressed a commitment- not a determination, as is clearly specified in the NPT document on principles and objectives- to pursue systematic and progressive efforts to reduce nuclear weapons globally.
Some States have expressed concern about possible duplication and indigenous organizations have signalled their unanimous support for the continuation of all existing mechanisms.
Those States have expressed reservations on the Convention related to the protection of national security, especially that of countries that have no other means to protect their vast lands.
The fact that several States have expressed an intention to join the organization proves that the SCO is making a constructive contribution to regional and global security and stability.
Several States have expressed general concern about States granting political asylum to individuals sought by other States in connection with terrorist crimes.
Several other States have expressed the view that an impermissible reservation should be considered null and void, while emphasizing that the specific consequences of this nullity must be spelled out.
Many States have expressed concern that the responsibility to protect will be used as a guise for military interventions that violate sovereignty and territorial integrity and whose intentions are quite other than preventing mass crimes.
For their part,coastal States have expressed concerns about security and the necessity to maintain effective border and immigration controls and to prevent and combat transnational organized crimes such as smuggling and trafficking.
However, many States have expressed concerns about significant parts of the draft declaration as drafted by the working group, and in the absence of real consensus Australia considers that it would be premature for States to consider the adoption of the draft declaration.