Примеры использования Strategic weapons на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
New strategic weapons are being produced, but only very slowly.
By the year 2003, the START treaties would have considerably reduced the strategic weapons arsenal.
Continued reliance on strategic weapons for security has rendered those weapons redundant.
It also expressed confidence in the operational readiness of Pakistan's strategic weapons.
However, import and export of strategic weapons and dual-use goods have to be declared to Customs prior to their import or export.
Люди также переводят
Chemical warheads for ballistic missiles developed at the very end of the programme were considered to be strategic weapons.
The beginning of bilateral negotiations with the Russian Federation on a strategic weapons treaty is a decisive step in the pursuit of our goal.
Why send dozens of B-1 and B-2 bombers, hundreds of modern combat planes,thousands of missiles and other strategic weapons?
It is important to emphasize that the danger of nuclear and conventional strategic weapons is ominous, and that the challenges to their disarmament are enormous.
Israel welcomes the agreements signed in recent years between the Russian Federation andthe United States regarding their strategic weapons.
I urge the United States andRussia to apply these measures without delay to all strategic weapons covered by START II, and subsequently by START III.
The application of international humanitarian law requires proportionality of response in armed conflicts,as regards both conventional and strategic weapons.
Sixthly, in regard to transparency, controlling conventional and strategic weapons plays a critical role in consolidating international peace and security.
Apart from its resort to repression and terror against the Kashmiri freedom movement,India's reckless buildup of conventional and strategic weapons betrays hegemonic aims.
The reckless build-up of conventional and strategic weapons to underpin the provenly flawed policy of aggrandisement negates the aspirations of the people of South Asia, including the billion citizens of India itself.
In that regard, the proposal by the President of the United States of America in 2013 to reduce the amount of strategic weapons by one third was a positive step.
As far as strategic weapons are concerned, the START Treaty reduced United States and Russian deployed strategic warheads from well over 10,000 to 6,000 each by the end of 2001.
But this will still leave the two countries holding approximately 7,000 strategic weapons, each 10 to 50 times the size of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima.
In Makarov's own words,“The treaty on strategic offensive weapons we are currently working on must take into account the link between defensive and offensive strategic weapons.
A Strategic Command Force, established in each of the three armed services,ensures that our strategic weapons are never used unintentionally, accidentally or without due authorization.
He stressed this intention during his recent visit to London, where he stated that Iran, Iraq and Libya constituted a threat to the security of his country andthat Israel would therefore never think of re-evaluating its strategic weapons.
We are extremely concerned about strategic plans that provide for the advance deployment of new strategic weapons, which are bound to fan tensions and revive the reflexes of the Cold War.
The parties to the NPT should therefore encourage all the States that possess tactical nuclear weapons to ensure that the same transparency prevails andthe same confidence-building measures are accepted as in the case of strategic weapons.
The three fully ratified Soviet-American and Russo-American strategic weapons treaties(the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, the Start I Treaty and the Moscow Treaty) all emphasize limits on deployment and modernization.
It is also important that the treaty include a pledge by all parties not to arm themselves with new kinds of strategic weapons which at this time are not in their arsenals.
While unilateral andbilateral efforts to reduce strategic weapons arsenals were welcome, the NPT remained a valid alternative to deterrence and military measures and an adequate response to the many current challenges to international peace and security.
It is also important that the treaty should contain a commitment on the part of all its parties not to put into service new kinds of strategic weapons that do not exist in their current arsenals.
Also, the reckless build-up of conventional and strategic weapons by the one State in South Asia that seeks political, military and economic hegemony over the entire subcontinent is escalating tensions and poses a threat to peace and development in other regions.
In this connection, we must accelerate the process to achieve effective implementation of the START II Treaty andearly completion of new agreements on further reductions of the strategic weapons arsenals of the two major nuclear Powers.
These efforts could involve the disposal of strategic weapons which are to be eliminated under existing treaties, assurances regarding the targeting policies of nuclear-weapon States, control over nuclear materials and technology that may lead to horizontal or vertical proliferation, and restraining the destabilizing effects of emerging technologies.