Примеры использования Sub-standard shipping на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Action Plan to Combat Sub-standard Shipping 1998.
Good, as well as bad,publicity can be an important tool in combating sub-standard shipping.
Policy Statement on Sub-standard Shipping by the Maritime Transport Committee of OECD 2002.
Incentive and reward programmes can be effective tools to help combat sub-standard shipping.
Acknowledgement that sub-standard shipping cannot be dealt with simply through an all-encompassing review of legal liability.
The remainder of the paper addresses the potential roles of parties other than the shipowner in combating sub-standard shipping.
Discussion Paper on Possible Actions to Combat Sub-standard Shipping by Involving Players Other than the Shipowner in the Shipping Market73.
The Maritime Transport Committee(MTC) of OECD has over the past several years produced several substantive reports relating to the problem of sub-standard shipping.
Continue with the implementation of those aspects of the 1998 Action Plan to Combat Sub-standard Shipping that are of interest to the various industry players, and which provide an incentive to sustain high-quality participation in shipping. .
MTC members will examine whether this information lends itself to further consolidation andrelease on the Committee's sub-standard shipping web site.
Therefore, by definition any incentives must be clearly andclosely linked to sub-standard shipping and must have the effect of directly increasing the burdens and costs of sub-standard ship operators and users vis-à-vis those that are behaving responsibly.
With this background firmly in mind, the Maritime Transport Committee andits member States endorse the following actions as reflecting their policy stance with respect to sub-standard shipping.
In the interim, the Maritime Transport Committee establishing an Internet page on its web site, dedicated to sub-standard shipping, which will include links to bodies(such as IACS and port State control authorities) that provide relevant, publicly available information on sub-standard shipping.
Caribbean countries have agreed to collaborate in the implementation of a system of port State control to ensure that sub-standard shipping is eradicated from the region.
The MTC also considers that its 1998 Action Plan to Combat Sub-standard Shipping, adopted as a result of a round-table meeting with industry, can still make a considerable contribution, as it aims to strengthen industry involvement and attempts to promote effective exchanges of information between various industry players.
This has resulted in increasing regulation on merchant vessels in respect of at-sea safety,security, sub-standard shipping, environmental issues, and ownership and control.
Investigate how to enhance access to relevant, easily accessible and up-to-date information,especially from port State control inspections, to assist shipbrokers in action to combat sub-standard shipping.
To further this objective, the Maritime Transport Committee andits member States have endorsed this Policy Statement to demonstrate the importance attached to the campaign to eliminate sub-standard shipping, and to highlight the actions that will be taken by the Committee and its member States in pursuance of that objective.
Therefore, the Action Plan will continue to be implemented in support of this Policy Statement, but will now be treated as a longer-term activity,aimed at gradually strengthening action against sub-standard shipping.
Examine whether existing information on sub-standard shipping from various sources lends itself to further consolidation andrelease on the Committee's sub-standard shipping web site, in order to expose operators and users of sub-standard shipping or promote responsible shipowners and other industry parties.
Also, the MTC urges all of its members to ensure that their maritime administrations freely and frequently make information on sub-standard shipping publicly available, inter alia, through Equasis.
The Maritime Transport Committee therefore urges all flag and port States, shipowners, ship operators, shipping companies, shippers and other parties involved in the maritime sector to act effectively andconscientiously in their approach to sub-standard shipping, so that the ability of unscrupulous operators to offer sub-standard ships, and the opportunity for unscrupulous or gullible charterers and shippers to accept them, is severely limited or removed completely.
Port States can be effective in identifying sub-standard ships, and they are encouraged to communicate with the flag States concerned and freely exchange all available information among themselves.
It builds on previous work undertaken by MTC on the costsavings unscrupulous shipowners and operators could realize by operating sub-standard ships.
Discuss with Governments and industry representatives the issue of legal liability, which may be created by the reasonable dissemination anduse of information regarding sub-standard ships.
Unless the root causes of the problem are addressed, sub-standard ships will continue to sink, threatening lives, the marine and coastal environment, and the economies of affected communities.
Even if a flag State eliminates a sub-standard ship from its register, the owner can easily find another accommodating flag State.
Flag States have the principal responsibility for identifying and dealing with sub-standard ships, and must take effective action to ensure that such ships cannot operate as long as they fail to meet international maritime conventions.
At the same time(and probably as an unintended consequence)it also provides very effective coverage for sub-standard ships by allowing their risk to be spread over many players in the transportation chain, and ultimately to consumers.
It makes a number of suggestions on initiatives for further examination as to how these players might make a greater contribution to reinforce theimportance of quality shipping, and thus drive sub-standard ships further towards the margins of the industry.