Примеры использования The commission considered it на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Commission considered it useful to continue to monitor developments in the area of science and technology.
In view of the problems identified during this phase, the Commission considered it necessary to expand the study and explore alternative methods.
The Commission considered it reasonable to establish the schedule of the end-of-service severance pay at a level of five to six months of base salary.
If, however, the Commission considered it useful, then the Secretariat could include in the paragraph a reference to international accounting standards.
Having reviewed the attributes andgoals endorsed at the previous session(see paras. 31 and 32 above), the Commission considered it appropriate to summarize and complement them in the following mission statement.
As for draft article 13, if the Commission considered it necessary to have a separate article on the right to private and family life, paragraph 1 would be sufficient.
The Commission considered it appropriate that the Assembly's concerns be given prominence in the review, while taking due account also of the views of the users of the scheme.
As a precise interpretation of dominance had led to some queries, the Commission considered it advisable to include a more specific reference in the methodology in that regard.
Accordingly, the Commission considered it prudent simply to take note in the Guide to Practice of this procedural parallelism between the formulation of reservations and the formulation of objections.
In view of the Assembly's intention to consider the 2005 and2006 annual reports simultaneously at its sixty-first session, the Commission considered it advisable to combine its recommendations for those years in order to save the Assembly's time and avoid confusion.
The Commission considered it preferable, in the present draft articles, to use this term rather than the term“granting” to refer to the act of the conferral by a State of its nationality to an individual.
Having established the criteria for reviewing the elements of the system, the Commission considered it appropriate to elaborate broad objectives for the exercise, setting these out in the following mission statement.
The Commission considered it important for national institutions which conform with the Principles relating to the status of national institutions to participate in an appropriate manner in their own right in meetings of the Commission on Human Rights and its subsidiary bodies.
In two cases concerning the use of the Slovene andthe Flemish languages respectively in civil court procedures, the Commission considered it relevant that the legal provisions on court language were complied with and that the applicants had bilingual lawyers.
In addition, the Commission considered it advisable that an absolute minimum number of employers from the private and public(including the national civil service) sectors be required before resorting to the salary movement data.
While noting that the design of the proposed network was based on existing scientific work, the Commission considered it premature to propose to the Council that it use its powers under the Convention to institute a permanent closure of the areas concerned.
In the past the Commission considered it its duty to consult the Meeting on such important issues, inter alia, as submissions in case of a dispute between States with opposite or adjacent coasts or in other cases of unresolved land or maritime disputes.
In the light of these considerations andnotwithstanding the absence of an obligation in the Vienna regime to give the reasons for objections, the Commission considered it useful to include in the Guide to Practice guideline 2.6.9, which encourages States and international organizations to expand and develop the practice of stating reasons.
The Commission considered it essential to improve dialogue and cooperation between trade, environment and other relevant policy makers at the national level, as well as among relevant international organizations, including secretariats of multilateral environmental agreements.
In view of the principle set forth in article 20, paragraph 3, of the Vienna Conventions andof the practice normally followed by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the Commission considered it useful to set forth in a draft guideline the obligation to communicate reservations to the constituent instrument of an international organization to the organization in question.
The Commission considered it essential to keep a regular dialogue with the Rule of Law Group through the Rule of Law Unit and to keep abreast of progress made in the integration of the work of UNCITRAL into the United Nations joint rule of law activities.
Rather than reproducing guidelines 2.1.3(Representation for the purpose of formulating a reservation at the international level), 2.1.4(Absence of consequences at the international level of the violation of internal rules regarding the formulation of reservations), 2.1.5(Communication of reservations), 2.1.6(Procedure for communication of reservations) and 2.1.7(Functions of depositaries)by simply replacing"reservation" with"objection" in the text of the guidelines, the Commission considered it prudent to make a general reference in the texts of these guidelines.
Given this very small number of claims, the Commission considered it impractical to continue maintaining it as a separate education grant area.
The Commission considered it important to analyze the attacks on UNIFIL and Observer Group Lebanon(OGL) positions which were either directly hit by IDF fire or were the object of firing close to their positions, including the deaths of four unarmed United Nations observers at the Khiyam base.
Given the very small number of staff claims in the Oslo area, the Commission considered it impractical to continue to maintain Norway as a separate zone for purposes of administration of the education grant.
In these circumstances, the Commission considered it necessary to draw a distinction between the rules applying to the legal effects of a valid reservation, which are set out-- at least partially-- in the two Vienna Conventions, and those concerning the legal effects of an invalid reservation.
To make the exclusion in principle of the late formulation of reservations even stricter, the Commission considered it useful to adopt guideline 2.3.3,the purpose of which is to indicate that a party to a treaty may not get round this prohibition by means that have the same purpose as reservations but do not meet the definition of reservations. Otherwise, the chapeau of article 19 of the 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions would be deprived of any specific scope.
The Commission considered it necessary for the analytical capacity of the secretariat to be strengthened for carrying out in-depth analysis of the core issues of international trade and competition law and policy, particularly of their development dimensions, as well as for the related quantitative work.