Примеры использования The complainants submit на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
On 8 July 2013, the complainants submitted further comments.
The complainants submitted a new report on their psychological state.
In a letter dated 1 July 2002, the complainants submitted their observations on the merits.
The complainants submitted comments on the State party's observations on 17 June 2007.
As to the general human rights situation in Azerbaijan, the complainants submit that the situation has deteriorated, in particular for journalists.
The complainants submitted their comments on the State party's observations on 5 January 2009.
By reference to annual reports of Amnesty International, the U.S. Department of State anda report of the Commission on Human Rights, the complainants submit that torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment are common occurrences in Sri Lanka.
On 7 March 2007, the complainants submitted their comments on the State party's observations.
As to the fact that neither the first named complainant norher brother were cited as detainees on any of the Amnesty lists, the complainants submit that these lists were incomplete and that, according to the Danish document referred to,"some of the detainees on the Amnesty list had in reality no connection with RDRUbuyanja.
The complainants submit that during their detention Iranian police ill-treated and tortured them.
On 16 October 2006, the complainants submitted their comments on the State party's observations.
The complainants submit that the State party left out relevant information in its account of the Embassy report of 16 June 2005.
On the general human rights situation in Azerbaijan, the complainants submit that the situation has deteriorated and refers to two reports from the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment of the Human Rights Council, in the basis of which the complainants' consider that there is a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant and/or mass violations of human rights within the meaning of article 3 of the Convention, in Azerbaijan.
The complainants submit that their accounts provided in the framework of the asylum proceedings were detailed, substantiated and credible.
The complainants submit that the Swiss asylum authorities did not find their accounts credible for the following reasons.
The complainants submit that they have exhausted all available domestic remedies to obtain redress before the State party's asylum authorities.
The complainants submit that, in 1999, when they were adolescents, they had to flee from the Islamic Republic of Iran with their family.
The complainants submit that the risk of their persecution in Yemen is aggravated by the first complainant's political activities in Switzerland.
The complainants submit that they continued to be involved in political activities during their stay in Switzerland and that the Indian authorities are well aware of that.
The complainants submit that the available domestic remedies are not effective, as gross breaches of the complainant's rights to a fair trial have been committed.
The complainants submit that it is hard to contest the credentials of the lawyer engaged by the Swedish Embassy in Ankara, since no specific information is given about him.
The complainants submit that a criminal case against the first-named complainant(No. 1999/190) in Van is still open in relation to his membership of a terrorist organization.
The complainants submit that their deportation from Switzerland to India would constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention against Torture because they would face serious threats to their health and lives.
The complainants submit that K.N. was able to cite 19 members of the central committee of Komala during asylum proceedings, and that his testimony regarding his activities for Komala was not contradictory.
The complainants submit that, contrary to the State party's contention, they would face real and imminent risk of being subjected to torture or other inhuman and degrading treatment in Tunisia.
The complainants submit that, despite the strong aftereffects of the first complainant's torture, he never consulted a medical doctor, but rather tried to suppress his traumatic experience.
The complainants submit that the State party has violated articles 2, paragraph 1, read in conjunction with articles 1, 16, paragraph 1, and 12, 13, 14, taken alone or together with article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
The complainants submit that the same matter has not been and is not being examined under another procedure of international investigation or settlement, and that they have exhausted all available domestic remedies.
The complainants submit that they have discharged the burden of presenting an"arguable case", sufficient to require a response based on concrete evidence from the State party, rather than general assumptions or bare assertions.
In conclusion, the complainants submit that"they were indeed subjected to acts of community violence inflicting on them great physical and mental suffering amounting to torture and/or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment.