Примеры использования The view that the geostationary orbit на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit, which had sui generis characteristics, was an integral part of outer space.
Some delegations were of the view that the geostationary orbit was part of outer space, was not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation or by any other means, including by means of use or repeated use, and that its utilization was governed by the Outer Space Treaty and ITU treaties.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource and that it was at risk of becoming saturated.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource with a number of sui generis characteristics, which risked saturation, and that, therefore, assurances should be given that the benefits of its exploitation would be extended to all nations, regardless of their present technical capabilities.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource at risk of becoming saturated, which threatened the sustainability of outer space activities.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was an integral part of outer space and that its use was governed by the provisions of the Outer Space Treaty and the treaties of ITU.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was an integral part of outer space and that its use was governed by the provisions of the United Nations treaties on outer space.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource and that saturation should be avoided in order to ensure that all countries had non-discriminatory access to the orbit. .
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit-- a limited natural resource clearly in danger of saturation-- must be used rationally and should be made available to all States, irrespective of their current technical capacities.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit, because of its particular characteristics, required a special, sui generis legal regime to regulate access and utilization by all States, taking into account the needs of developing countries.
Some delegations were of the view that the geostationary orbit was an integral part of outer space and that, therefore, its use should be governed by the provisions of the United Nations treaties on outer space and the ITU regulations.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit provided unique potential for access to communications and information, in particular for assisting developing countries in implementing social programmes and educational projects and for providing medical assistance.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit, because of its particular characteristics, required a special, sui generis, legal regime to regulate access and utilization by all States, taking into account the needs of developing countries.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource with sui generis characteristics and that equitable access to it should be guaranteed for all States, taking particular account of the needs of developing countries.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource with sui generis characteristics that risked saturation and that equitable access to it should therefore be guaranteed for all States, taking into account in particular the needs of developing countries and the geographical position of certain countries.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource with sui generis characteristics that risked saturation and that, therefore, equitable access to it should be guaranteed for all States, taking particular account of the needs and interests of developing countries and the geographical position of certain countries.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource with a number of sui generis characteristics, which risked saturation, and that, therefore, it was necessary to ensure that its use was rationalized and extended to all countries, especially those which did not currently have the technical and scientific capacity within their reach.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource with sui generis characteristics that risked saturation and that its utilization should be based on the principle of rational and equitable access for all countries, taking into account the special needs of developing countries and the geographical situation of particular countries.
Some delegations reiterated the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource with sui generis characteristics that risked saturation and that its utilization should be based on the principle of rational and equitable access for all countries, taking into account the special needs of developing countries, the geographical position of certain countries and the process of ITU.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was part of outer space,that it was not subject to national appropriation by a claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation or by any other means, including by means of use or repeated use, and that its utilization was governed by the Outer Space Treaty, and the ITU Constitution, Convention and Radio Regulations.
Some delegations were of the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource that risked becoming saturated,that its exploitation should be rationalized and that it should be made available to all States, irrespective of their current technical capabilities, thus giving them the opportunity to have access to the geostationary orbit under equitable conditions, taking into account, in particular, the needs of developing countries.
Some delegations were of the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource that risked becoming saturated, thereby threatening the sustainability of space activities in that environment; that its exploitation should be rationalized; and that it should be made available to all States, under equitable conditions, irrespective of their current technical capabilities, taking into account in particular the needs of developing countries and the geographical position of certain countries.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was a limited natural resource that was at risk of becoming saturated, thereby threatening the sustainability of space activities in that environment; that its exploitation should be rationalized; and that it should be made available to all States, under equitable conditions, irrespective of their current technical capabilities, taking into particular account the needs of developing countries and the geographical position of certain countries.
Some delegations expressed the view that the geostationary orbit was part of outer space,that it was not subject to national appropriation by a claim of sovereignty, by occupation or by any other means, including by means of use or repeated use, and that its utilization was governed by the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, and the ITU Constitution, Convention and Radio Regulations.
The view was expressed that the geostationary orbit constituted an integral part of outer space.